They Seek Deep to Hide Their Counsels from the Lord

 Previously: Is Zion a "Sustainable Society"?

Moroni, son of Mormon, was a solitary man for what we can assume was a long time. After his father died, he remained alone to write the sad tale of the destruction of his people. He must've had a lot of time to ponder and reflect, especially since he had received the Second Comforter and been in the presence of Christ. 

Before he sealed up the plates he left us with some powerful sermons, and since he had no one to preach to we know that they were written for us. Like his father, he also saw our day, and he knew what kind of deception we would be facing. I do not think it coincidence that one of the last chapters of the Book of Mormon is Moroni 7; the key for discerning the difference between good and evil. 

Jesus told his followers that in the last days that "false Christs, and false prophets... shall show great signs and great wonders, insomuch, that, if possible, they shall deceive the very elect..." I'm convinced that Moroni wrote his sermon on discernment with this very thing in mind. There is only one way to avoid deception, and that is to take the Holy Spirit as your guide. The alternative is relying on the words and works of men, which is a recipe for spiritual disaster and ultimately, deception. The false priests, prophets, and anti-Christs who will come will be so convincing that it will be almost impossible not to believe them. Their words will sound so pleasing, will make you feel so good, will be so flattering and logical, that only the meek, humble, and lowly in heart will be able to withstand them. But as Nephi said, even the humble followers of Christ do err in many instances, because of the precepts of men. 

The deceivers will come from all levels of society, they won't just be the obvious ones: the leaders of world religions with ties to globalists and secret combinations (although those are the ones I'll be writing about in this post). Many of them will come from the margins of society, where all true prophets come from. They won't be trying to make money and they will seem sincere. In fact, some of them may actually be sincere, but are deceived by false spirits who flatter them into believing they are someone important. Remember, God is no respecter of persons and all men are on equal grounds. The point is, there will NEVER be a man that you can put your trust in; you have to learn to put your trust in Christ, your complete and total trust, like a child who trusts his parents. Be skeptical of any man who preaches anything, especially those who point to themselves. 

Moroni begins his sermon will the following adage:

For I remember the word of God which saith by their works ye shall know them; for if their works be good, then they are good also. 

 And then he tells you how to determine what "good" works are and "who" they are done by:

Wherefore, a man being evil cannot do that which is good; neither will he give a good gift. For behold, a bitter fountain cannot bring forth good water; neither can a good fountain bring forth bitter water; wherefore, a man being a servant of the devil cannot follow Christ; and if he follow Christ he cannot be a servant of the devil. 

Wherefore, all things which are good cometh of God; and that which is evil cometh of the devil; for the devil is an enemy unto God, and fighteth against him continually, and inviteth and enticeth to sin, and to do that which is evil continually. But behold, that which is of God inviteth and enticeth to do good continually; wherefore, every thing which inviteth and enticeth to do good, and to love God, and to serv him, is inspired of God. (Moroni 7:10-13, Emphasis added) 

Much of what the devil "invites and entices" us to do, or to believe in, seems really good. In my last post I wrote about the occult origins of the United Nations, which on the outside seems like a "good" organization with noble goals for the betterment of mankind. Without studying the history, the symbols, and the Marxist leanings of those who created it, it's difficult to discover that the UN is front organization for totalitarianism. The point is, figuring out the difference between the good and bad guys takes study and effort, and the Book of Mormon is the handbook that shows you the way. 

No matter what a person says, what church he belongs to, what charities he donates to, or what lofty ideals he articulates for mankind, he is either a servant of Christ or the devil. There is no in between. You have to figure out if he belongs to the church of the Lamb or the church of the devil, and remember, these are spiritual entities. Physical entities subscribe to and become part of them, but they exist primarily in the spiritual world. Nephi tells us that those who belong to the church of the Lamb are very few in number, while those who belong to the devil's kingdom are numerous and build up churches to get gain and power over the flesh. The first clue he gives us is that any church that says, "Behold I, I am the Lord's," is a trademark of churches who are not built up unto the Lord. 

When I was a young missionary, I would read these chapters and snarkily think of the people I was teaching and how it was their churches that Nephi was talking about. I went to Wisconsin, where the few that were religious were extremely set in their ways. It never crossed my mind until about 8 years ago that Nephi was also talking about my church. Well, now I believe that he was speaking directly to the LDS Church, because, despite the obvious fact its members make up of the majority of people reading the Book of Mormon, it's now the wealthiest church in the world.  

The chapters in Nephi I’m referring to are 2 Nephi 26-30, and they are loaded with prophecy and condemnation. Nephi taught in a specific pattern, after he presents the words of Isaiah from the Brass Plates, with commentary from him and his brother Jacob, he unleashes a string of his own prophecies about the church and "churches" that those who will be reading his words will belong to. And then he finishes strong with the Doctrine of Christ in chapters 31 and 32. One thing to keep in mind here is that the phrase "many churches” doesn't necessarily mean different sects, and to "build up" churches doesn't necessarily imply different religions. Remember in the New Testament Paul addressed the "churches" of Macedonia and Galatia, yet we know they all originated from the Church of Christ set up by the apostles. Nephi could simply be addressing different wards and stakes as "churches," and to "build-up" churches could simply mean constructing physical buildings and adding physical membership to the mother church. 

I'm not saying that Nephi's prophecies do not apply to other religious sects whose "fine sanctuaries" and priestcraft laden leadership "grind upon the face of the poor." There is plenty of that going on in other religions, but for the most part those people and their pastors are NOT reading the Book of Mormon. So why would Nephi tell the Mormons what the "other guys" are doing without addressing the one church that could help the poor the most but doesn't? Besides the one-percent they donate to say they give something. The other ninety-nine percent (of $100 billion) could go far to help the struggling poor all throughout the Church membership and the world in general. See Rebekah Griffin's well-done video below to see just where all this money is going:

Let me get back to Nephi's pattern. After he lays out all the things we are doing wrong he offers us the chance to repent. And we know he is addressing the Latter-Day Saints because he uses the term Gentiles. As I pointed out in this piece I wrote a few weeks ago, when the Book of Mormon uses the word Gentile it is mostly addressing the LDS Church and other restoration branches, remember the book would come forth by way of the Gentiles. And here is Nephi's invitation to repent:

Wo be unto the Gentiles, saith the Lord of Hosts! For notwithstanding I shall lengthen out mine arm unto them from day to day, they will deny me; nevertheless, I will be merciful unto them, saith the Lord God, if they will repent and come unto me; for mine arm is lengthened out all the day long, saith the Lord God of Hosts. (2 Nephi 28:32)

Take note there is only one "wo" pronounced upon the Gentiles here (more on this later). After he extends this invitation he rolls right into more prophecy about the Gentiles saying thy have a Bible and don't need any more Bible. Well again, when I was a young missionary I assumed Nephi was talking about all those "other guys" I was trying to introduce the Book of Mormon to. It made sense, they were saying literally those same words to me, "we already have a Bible." It was uncanny to me, I figured Nephi had those people nailed. Again, I'm sure Nephi was partly addressing those people, but I missed the fact that he also addressing the Latter-Day Saints. How do I know? These verses right here:

But thus saith the Lord God: O fools, they shall have a Bible; and it shall proceed forth from the Jews, mine ancient covenant people. And what thank they the Jews for the Bible which they receive from them? Yea, what do the Gentiles mean? Do they remember the travails, and the labors, and the pains of the Jews, and their diligence unto me, in bringing forth salvation unto the Gentiles?

O ye Gentiles, have ye remembered the Jews, mine ancient covenant people? Nay; but ye have cursed them, and have hated them, and have not sought to recover them. But behold, I will return all these things upon your own heads; for I the Lord have not forgotten my people. (2 Nephi 29:4-5)

The Lord is calling us out in our treatment and cursing of the Jews. Think of all the slang and Jewish slurs some Americans use in their daily language? At least those of us who grew up in the more "red-neck" parts of Mormonville. If someone was tight with money we used to call them "Jewish." If someone was rich and took advantage of others we called them a "Jew." And how many conspiracy theorists think that the global cabal is made up of mostly Jews?  How about this one? When I was a kid people used to say that the Holocaust was a punishment for the Jews for killing Jesus. I mean that makes sense right? That God would punish their innocent ancestors two-thousand years later. The Lord is calling us a bunch of ignoramuses. Not only do we curse them, we don't realize all the trouble they went through in bringing forth the scriptures to us. Think of all the prophets that were killed, stoned, or driven out from among the Jewish people; many of them gave their lives so we could have their words of scripture. 

And now consider this line from verse 5, "ye... have not sought to recover them." Despite many branches of Mormonism having and distributing the Book of Mormon, little effort has been made to "recover" the Jews, God's "ancient covenant people." The LDS Church has an official presence in Israel at the BYU Jerusalem Center, but they made an agreement with the Israeli government decades ago not to proselyte. They are not even allowed to pass out Books of Mormon in Jerusalem, at book that ironically, was written to both "Jew and Gentile." 

But recently a project spearheaded by Adrian Larsen is attempting to change all that. There is now a version of the Book of Mormon that is catered specifically to the Jewish people. Because the Book of Mormon came by way of the Gentile, it is encumbered with Gentile language that is foreign to Jews, but ironically, the text is a record written by Jews for Jews. God speaks to people in their own language and understanding, and since the days of the Gentiles are coming to an end, he is now speaking directly to the Jews. The name of this version of the Nephite record is The Stick of Joseph in the Hand of Ephraim, and you can find a free pdf of it here. Also read this post on Adrian's blog for more information and to learn how this book fulfills prophecy both in the Old Testament and the Book of Mormon. According to Adrian, this effort of reaching the Jews marks the beginning of the Lord's promise that he would set his hand again the second time to recover his people, and to bring them to the knowledge of the true Messiah. 

Three Woes for the Elite

There are two places in the Book of Mormon where three "woes" are pronounced upon the wicked, once by Nephi and once by Jesus Christ. Nephi is speaking of those who are puffed up with pride:

O the wise, and the learned, and the rich, that are puffed up in the pride of their hearts, and all those who preach false doctrines, and all those who commit whoredoms, and pervert the right way of the Lord, wo, wo, wo be unto them, saith the Lord God Almighty, for they shall be thrust down to hell! (2 Nephi 28:15, Emphasis added)

A few paragraphs ago I quoted Nephi at the end of chapter 28 extending an invitation of repentance to the Gentiles. There was only one "wo" pronounced upon them. I think this is significant. I think he may be addressing two different groups of people here. Throughout the entire chapter Nephi is condemning certain actions and words that could only be committed and uttered by those in some position of power or authority. For example, hearken unto us, hear ye our precept, God has done his work, dig a pit for thy neighbor, false teachers who preach false doctrine, they rob the poor because of their fine sanctuaries, they rob the poor with their fine clothing, they engage in wickedness, abominations, and whoredoms, etc. Who do you think owns the "fine sanctuaries" like the temples and the Conference Center? It is certainly not the average member of the Church; technically, it is the Corporation Sole or the President of the Church. Who do you think Nephi is talking about?

Now for the clincher. Nephi repeats a phrase that Isaiah said in the previous chapter, and when something is repeated in scripture we might want to pay attention. He said there shall be many who "shall seek deep to hide their counsels from the Lord; and their works shall be in the dark." Who is he talking about? Isaiah offers another clue:

And wo unto them that seek deep to hide their counsel from the Lord! And their works are in the dark; and they say: Who seeth us, and who knoweth us? And they also say: Surely, your turning of things upside down shall be esteemed as the potter's clay. But behold, I will show unto them, saith the Lord of Hosts, that I know all their works. For shall the work say of him that made it, he made me not? Or shall the thing framed say of him that framed it, he had no understanding? (2 Nephi 27:27)

Whoever these people are, they operate in the dark. They think no one knows what they are doing. The "potter's clay" analogy is an interesting one; it is a metaphor for God's creative power. He, the Great Potter, formed us out of clay, and Isaiah is saying that the clay thinks it has transcended its own Creator (this could be alluding to Luciferianism: ascension without a Savior). In other words, these men who "seek deep to hide their counsel from the Lord," think they are able to keep secrets from and deceive God himself. Not only that, but they think they can deceive God's children as well. This line is very interesting: "surely, your turning of things upside down shall be esteemed as the potter's clay." They turn things upside down by preaching a false gospel, and "esteeming" themselves as the chosen "clay" or vessels placed in authority over others. But God knows all their works, and will someday expose all their secrets upon the housetops. Now let's read what Nephi said in its full context:

Yea, and there shall be many which shall teach after this manner, false and vain and foolish doctrines, and shall be puffed up in their hearts, and shall seek deep to hide their counsels from the Lord; and their works shall be in the dark. And the blood of the saints shall cry from the ground against them. (2 Nephi 28:9-10, Emphasis added)

Nephi just gave us another big clue: whoever these people are, they are murderers, otherwise the blood of the saints would not cry from the ground against them.  Now we know he is not just addressing ordinary folks who attend a corporate church and are deceived by its leadership. He is talking about people in power who are using that power to murder for gain and are getting away with it. How do we know they are getting away with it? Whenever the scriptures use language that suggests the saints have been killed and their blood is crying from the ground, it is usually followed by vengeance. Their blood is crying for vengeance against their murderers. This is a cry for justice, suggesting that the murderers are not being punished for their crimes, and won't be until they die and face the judgment of God. 

Interestingly, this same language is used by Moroni and Christ in reference to secret combinations. This is another big clue as to who these people are who "seek deep to hide their counsels from the Lord." They are actively taking part in and building up secret combinations. This is different than common people merely believing in the socialistic works of secret combinations because they are deceived. No, these people are using resources and financial means to build them up, and are propagandizing their followers to believe in their works. Here are the words of Moroni, remember he is addressing those who have "polluted the holy church of God":

Why do ye adorn yourself with that which hath no life, and yet suffer the hungry, and the needy, and the naked, and the sick and the afflicted to pass by you, and notice them not? Yea, why do ye build up your secret combinations to get gain, and cause that widows should mourn before the Lord, and also orphans to mourn before the Lord, and also the blood of their fathers and their husbands to cry unto the Lord from the ground, for vengeance upon your heads? Behold, the sword of vengeance hangeth over you; and the time soon cometh that he avengeth the blood of the saints upon you, for he will not suffer their cries any longer. (Mormon 8:39-41, Emphasis added)

Now it's getting serious. Moroni, like Nephi, is also accusing those who have polluted the "holy church of God" of murder. He is declaring that they have blood on their hands. Why? Because they support the secret combinations who create war. War causes widows and orphans to mourn for the loss of their husbands and fathers. You can read this classic post from Pure Mormonism to find out how the Church supports the military and justifies killing for those members who serve in it. But I don't think this is what Moroni is talking about. I'm afraid this is more than just financial and rhetorical support for these secret combinations, I think what Moroni is saying is that the corporate Church has become part of them. Why? Because he says that they build up the secret combinations to get gain. If they were not part of these organizations, they would not be on the payroll. 

The Melbourne Man

I'm going to take a detour here and take you back to the year 1947, the setting is Melbourne, Australia. Get comfortable, relax, and get ready for a mind-bending trip into the upside down. This story is recorded in the D. Christian Markham's There are Save Two Churches Only, that I've referenced several times throughout this blog. This is the story of the "Melbourne Man," told by Marion Law who served a mission there and had this experience at the tender age of 21. Marion met a full-fledged member of the Great and Abominable Church of the Devil, and he told Marion everything, I mean he really spilled the beans, and the poor missionary barely escaped with his life. 

One day as Marion and his companion were doing their work, they decided to walk on opposite sides of the lane to talk to more people. Marion knocked on a door and a man answered, but before he could find his companion the man insisted that he come into the house. As he began to share the message of the plan of salvation the man interrupted with, "we have a better plan," so Marion asked what it was. 

He got both barrels. The man envisioned a utopia as Plato had, (Plato was a mystery school initiate and communist), which consisted of a society with "three classes of people: the leaders, the workers, and the teachers." The teachers would teach the workers how to be "sinless," free of hate, greed, envy, etc. The hapless workers would never be jealous of the leaders, who promised not to oppress them, and society would be "perfect." Breeders would be selected, defective babies eliminated, and a plan of eugenics implemented for population control. The goal was to create a "master race of geniuses."

Science would devote its energy to developing a bioengineered body that could live forever (transhumanism), and a space program to seek out other planets suitable for humans. The masses would be controlled through "diet, drugs, music, movies, education, etc." The diet would consist of bioengineered food that would leave people "submissive and easily controlled." This food would contain "additives and special formulas," as well as structurally changed plants and animals ( I can only assume he was predicting GMO food). He explained to Marion the science of drug addiction, and how it would be used to manipulate society. He also explained how music would be used to do same. This music was called "melodic dissonance," based upon a rhythm of 60-120 beats per minute, and was proven to work on dogs through experimentation. Some of the dogs died when the metronome would swing wildly between 60 and 120 bpm. Similar experiments with similar results were done on humans by the Russians. 

The Beatles, who were trained in Europe, spear-headed this movement in America and became an instant hit. Marion recalls that when he first heard "rock & roll," he instantly knew what it was and who created it. The man told him that they would use "behavior modification conditioning in government schools, using audio-visual programs," with permanent results. The people will be fooled into thinking that they can still choose, but the man insisted that, "they will always choose exactly what they are conditioned to choose." 

At this point some spiritual power seized Marion and he could not move, and he used his strength to ask who the man the was. He answered that he was "one of three members of the central planning committee of the communist party for Australia." He told him that the coming communism was more than just economic, political and military... it was "spiritual communism, that would evolve into a worldwide government." When the New World Order would finally take over, they would simply kill anyone who "cannot be conditioned to be either a worker or a teacher." When Marion asked how many they would kill the man said, "hundreds of millions, maybe even you and me." 

He went on about reducing the population to a "manageable size," and how only the "inner corps of the elite know about the plan." A plan that has never been recorded or written down, a "secret plan." When Marion asked him why he told him all of that, the man said that they were looking for zealous young men to join them in the effort... to "bring about this heaven on earth. Think about it, not one soul will be lost." Marion lashed out, "you'll never take over the world." The man responded that they already control 2/3 of the world's governments, and the United States was the "last major hurdle to world domination." Marion rebuffed, "you'll never take over the United States!"

The man retorted that they already controlled American "entertainment, industry, the news media, the education system, the courts, the financial system, political parties. Where they don't have full control, they have infiltrated and have embedded their agents into all important decision-making bodies." Marion blurted out, "you don't control the education system." The reply was curt, "examine any text book in any school, at any level, from preschool to university graduate school. You will find no mention of Jesus Christ or God or His plan. But you will find our plan being taught at every level. It’s written into every textbook."

When the Melbourne man asked Marion to join their forces the courageous young missionary boldly declared he would follow the plan of the Father and His Son, Jesus Christ. The man became angry, and began shouting that "there no are no such beings!" Marion testified again, and the man attacked him with his fists, which freed him from the spiritual hold and allowed him to escape. He found his companion, who had been frantically searching for him, and they took the tram home. Marion slept for two days recovering from the spiritual attack. Twenty-five years later he told the whole story to President Benson in his office, who believed him, and told him that he had heard Satan's plan first hand. 

Now there is a more detailed account, and I want to share a little of it with you. And then you will know how it relates to this blog post. Marion said that the Melbourne man told him that there were three phases to the nature of man. His is first, "an economic animal," second, "a political animal," and third, "a spiritual animal." Hence, the conspirators must control the economy, the State, and the churches. The man told Marion the following chilling reality:

We control all the churches except The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. He said, we have them in our control and he said that when we have political and economic control of the world, we will then be able to establish our total spiritual program. (Two Churches Only, pp. 289-297)

This was in... 1947. Do you think the LDS Church is in their control today? Moroni certainly thinks so. Not only are they in their control, but they have joined with them, and become partners of all their substance, and are using that substance to push UN Agenda 2030, global vaccination programs, and Ecumenism. Have any of you, dear readers, ever wondered where the term New World Order came from? Yes it comes from a Latin phrase that is on the Great Seal of the United States... Novus Ordo Seclorum. But again I ask, where does it really come from? I've stated on this blog several times that there is nothing new under the sun. Well, have you ever heard of the Old World Order? The old one-world government under Rome and the Vatican, that tortured and murdered the saints of God? That controlled education, the flow of information, literature, religion, government, etc. That executed people for believing in so-called heresy? 

Well my friends, the New World Order is the same program, run by the same mystery schools, centered in the same philosophy of Luciferianism. Only the places, names, and dates change. America is definitely the new Rome, but is the LDS Church the new Vatican? Only time will tell. And I can assure you, whatever the new world religion is, it will definitely not be Christianity. In the coming years, many Christians may face the same dilemma the ancient Nephites did: the prospect of being put to death for not denying the Christ. Even if you are awake it may be too late to stop this. The best we can do is take the Holy Spirit as our guide to avoid being deceived. 

Three "Woes" declared by Jesus 

Just after the Lord was resurrected he destroyed much of the Nephite civilization. When the dust cleared the survivors heard a voice in the midst of a "vapor of darkness," so thick that the people could "feel" it. The first thing Jesus said was "wo, wo, wo unto this people." Three woes, but for who? The second thing he said was, "wo unto the inhabitants of the whole earth except they repent..." Again, like Nephi, it seems as though Jesus is addressing two groups of people: those whom he just destroyed (three woes), and those who were spared (one wo). Then he tells the remaining few why he destroyed all of their cities. The main reasons are summed up in what happened to the city of Jacobugath: 

Jacobugath... have I caused to be burned with fire because of their sins and their wickedness, which was above all the wickedness of the whole earth, because of their secret murders and combinations; for it was they that did destroy the peace of my people and the government of the land... (3 Nephi 9:9)

After describing the fate and mode of destruction he used for five major cities, he ended each summary with variations of the following phrase:

That the blood of the prophets and the saints should not come up any more unto me against them. (3 Nephi 9:5)

Five times the Lord gives the same reason that justified him in destroying the people. They were murderers. And it sounds like they committed it collectively. Were the three woes for the shadow leaders of the secret combinations and the dupes who believed in their works and unwittingly assisted them in their murders? It certainly seems so. Mormon gives us another clue in the next chapter when he explains why the "more righteous" part of the people were spared:

And it was the more righteous part of the people who were saved, and it was they who received the prophets and stoned them not; and it was they who had not shed the blood of the saints, who were spared... (3 Nephi 10:12)

I strongly believe that the Lord is trying to teach us a pattern here, a pattern with a warning. The people who received the prophets and were spared were not yet spiritually saved. They were more righteous than those who were slain, but they still had not fully come unto Christ. Here is what Jesus said to them:

O all ye that are spared because ye were more righteous than they, will ye not now return unto me, and repent of your sins, and be converted, that I may heal you? Yea, verily I say unto you, if ye will come unto me ye shall have eternal life. Behold, mine arm of mercy is extended towards you, and whosoever will come, him will I receive; and blessed are those who come unto me. (3 Nephi 9:13-14)

Besides the fact that these people were not murderers, why else were they spared? Well, because they were among those who did not kill the prophets perhaps they were more awake cognitively. Maybe they realized their "awful situation" that was caused by the secret combinations who were destroying their laws and government. Maybe they understood that their liberties were being destroyed. Maybe they were the "conspiracy theorists" that everyone else made fun of and thought were crazy. Maybe they still had enough of the Holy Spirit to realize that things were not right and they needed to wait upon the Lord for deliverance. 

Luckily, these questions are not left up to total speculation; another Book of Mormon prophet has commented on this very subject: Nephi's brother Jacob. And I only stumbled onto this because my good friend pointed me to this blog post written a decade ago. Here is what Jacob said about a future time when the Lord shall set his hand again the second time to recover the house of Israel:

And behold, according to the words of the prophet, the Messiah will set himself again the second time to recover them; wherefore, he will manifest himself unto them in power and great glory, unto the destruction of their enemies, when that day cometh when they shall believe in him; and none will he destroy that believe in him. 

And they that believe not in him shall be destroyed, both by fire, and by tempest, and by earthquakes, and by bloodsheds, and by pestilence, and by famine. And they shall know that the Lord is God, the Holy One of Israel. (2 Nephi 6:14-15, Emphasis added) 

Can you see how merciful the Lord is? All we have to do is believe in Him to avoid the coming destruction. But I think it is more than just saying you believe. It is acting on that belief by not subscribing to all the anti-Christian nonsense that is happening out there, much of it by those who feign Christianity. By being awake to your "awful situation" caused by the secret combination that is among us, which is now being built up by many powerful religions. By not trusting in the arm of flesh, and not believing the idle words of wolves in sheep's clothing, but believing the words of Christ, from prophets the world rejects. Do you notice how the destruction Jacob speaks of is almost exactly what happened to the Nephite civilization just before Christ came to visit them? This is a pattern and a type of things to come. The Lord always warns his people before they are destroyed; this is another truth taught in the Book of Mormon:

... and never hath any of them been destroyed save it were foretold them by the prophets of the Lord. (2 Nephi 25:9-10)

So as you can see, it's not all doom and gloom. There are many reasons to have hope. God is about to unearth his marvelous work and wonder and make kings shut their mouths. 

Counsels and Abominations

Now let's put this all together. What is the correlation between those whom Nephi gives three woes and those to whom Christ does? One word, abominations. Have you ever read a list of sins in scripture and wondered why God spells them all out like that? It's often things like, wickedness, iniquities, abominations, envyings, strifes, lasciviousness, whoredoms, etc. There are two common themes the word abomination or abominable is always associated with? Secret combinations and sexual sin. As bad as sexual sin is, we are told by Moroni that secret combinations are the "most abominable and wicked above all, in the sight of God." Nephi uses this word (abominations) a few verses after in describing those who "seek deep to hide their counsels from the Lord," and Jesus uses the words "wickedness and abominations" in describing those Nephite cities that were destroyed. I think we are onto something here. 

Now, what do counsels have to do with abominations? If you look up the etymology of the word counsel, you find that it derives from the Latin word consiliari or consilium, which means "plan, opinion," and "from the assimilated form of com," we get "with, together." So a counsel is made of people planning together with other people. A counselor, a person who counsels, is also a confidante, or someone who is entrusted with and keeps a secret. Do you see where this is going yet? Nephi and Isaiah are describing people who are planning secrets with others in the dark. They are talking about secret combinations. Nephi is telling us that churches will be involved in secret combinations, not just building them up, but actually being part of them. Otherwise, why would he say that there is blood crying from the ground against them?

But there is more. In Hebrew, the phrase seek deep is a metaphor to dig deep, or another way of describing people digging into the earth to hide things. In this case, to hide their counsels deep in the earth might mean that they are having their secret meetings underground. And it just so happens that Salt Lake City is littered with underground tunnels. It's no secret now that the there are tunnels under Temple Square that connect Church owned buildings and facilities, including the temple itself and the Church office building. You can read about that here. It makes sense right? Church leaders can freely move from building to building without fighting the hustle and bustle of traffic and facing the "shame" of walking among homeless people, but do the tunnels serve a more sinister purpose? Some tunnels are open to the public and temple patrons, and others are reserved only for Church leadership. And what about the Church vaults at Granite Mountain? What could they possibly be hiding down there? 

As you can see they hollowed out the inside of a granite mountain, I'm sure at quite a cost to tithe payers. This certainly fits the metaphor of digging deep in the earth to hide things. It's supposed to contain millions of genealogical records, but is that just a front? Could it hold historical artifacts about Joseph Smith that have never seen the light of day? Like definitive proof that Joseph wasn't a polygamist or Brigham’s complicity in his death? Or maybe it's filled with gold, silver and other treasure? The point is nobody knows, it's a secret, and the counsels that discuss what is inside must be held in the dark. The public is now offered a "virtual tour," but only the fifty-some employees are allowed inside, where they work storing, copying, and digitizing records. There could really be nothing but genealogical records in there, but can we trust a Church that is now lending its full support to the communist United Nations? 

Vaults and underground tunnels seem to be the pattern for powerful and wealthy churches. The Vatican holds some fifty miles of "shelving and documents dating back to the eighth century." This artifactual collection is known in Latin as the Archivum Secretum, and I bet it contains some juicy historical documents. Secretum in Latin doesn't really mean secret, it is more aptly translated private or personal. In addition to historical records, it holds the private letters and correspondence of Popes from the last four hundred years. Only accredited historians are given access to documents; no journalists or students are allowed inside. Historians may only request three documents per day for viewing, no photos are allowed, and everything is written in Latin or Italian. Finding anything good could take years, but some things have come to light during the last century. Like, for example, Pope Pius XII's (1922-39) deal with Mussolini to "protect the Church's interest in exchange for silence on state-sponsored anti-Semitism," or his predecessor, also Pope Pius XII's (1939-58) diplomacy with Germany and turning a blind-eye on the Holocaust. Other historical records the archive contains include the 1307 trial of the Knight's Templar (on a 197 foot-long scroll), the 1521 papal bull issued by Pope Leo X excommunicating Martin Luther, and letters to Pope Pius IX from both Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis during the Civil War. (Source)

One can't help but wonder what else lurks in the 50 miles of the Vatican's archives? Perhaps lost books of the Bible, records of ties to secret societies, links to the Italian Mafia, or financial records of deals with powerful corporations and international bankers? Or maybe this juicier stuff is held in some underground vault unbeknownst to the public? Just like Salt Lake, there are secret underground tunnels running all through the Vatican. There is one tunnel that stretches 2600 feet called the Passetto di Borgo, "small passage," linking the Vatican Palace to the Castel Sant'Angelo. And there are rumors of a massive 1500 mile tunnel under land and water that runs straight to Jerusalem, apparently filled with insane amounts of  gold. 

What else are they seeking deep to hide in the Vatican? The bottom line here is that if an organization needs to hide its history or conceal things in the earth we know it is not of God. Nephi told us how God operates:

For behold, my beloved brethren, I say unto you that the Lord God worketh not in darkness. (2 Nephi 26:23)

If a church has secret meetings or councils, or locked vaults closed to the public, or secret underground tunnels reserved for only its leaders, or access to unlimited amounts of tithing money with no accountability and no obligation to report to its members where the finances are going, it is NOT of God. God does not operate in the dark; God is transparent. In the verse before Nephi tells us exactly who does operate in the dark:

And there are also secret combinations, even as in times of old, according to the combinations of the devil, for he is the founder of all these things; yea, the founder of murder and works of darkness; yea, and he leadeth them by the neck with a flaxen cord, until he bindeth them with his strong cords forever. (2 Nephi 26:22, Emphasis added)

Notice that murder is frequently equated with secret combinations and works of darkness. It is their modus operandi, it's part of the gig. Nephi says the devil "is the founder of all these things." Here is another clue for our modern day. Look at the symbols that organizations use in their garb, their architecture, and their art. That is how these organizations reveal themselves. It is part of Satan's pride, he can't help but throw his logos on his works. In the video below, Christian lecturer Walter Veith guides you through two hours of symbolism found in the Vatican, in Hollywood, the UN, American government and corporations, and even the Statue of Liberty, nothing is as it seems. 

Most of the symbols Walter talks about come from the Vatican, it is oozing with the occult. But we shouldn't be surprised that the devil would infiltrate churches along with governments. Remember he said that in addition to tyrants, he would buy up "false priests who oppress." The best trick the devil ever played was convincing you that he doesn't exist at all, "I am no devil, for there is none." But, as the saying goes, the devil is in the details, and this is where you should look to find the truth. The LDS Church is no exception, since Russell Nelson has taken the reigns of the Corporation Sole, it has been steadily aligning itself with the Vatican. Even the new Church logo is a Masonic symbol, despite the fact that it portrays an image of Christ. I wrote about that here. Multiple Church leaders have referred to Pope Francis as "his holiness," and I don't think it coincidence that Nelson met with the Pope (in a meeting that was 33 minutes long by the way; where have we seen that number before?) in March of 2019, a year prior to Covid-19 and the rollout of draconian protocols, of which the LDS Church has been one of the biggest supporters. It makes one wonder what was really discussed in that 33 minute meeting.

I am going to share a document that a friend sent to me. It lays out exactly how the LDS Church has been building up and supporting the UN and its Agenda 2030. It is 34 pages long. Don't be intimidated by its length, study it carefully, these are important things to know. We have got to stop believing these imposters who pretend to be representatives of Christ. In reality they have nothing to do with Him.

The document reveals nothing that you can't find online, but it will save you months of searching things out on your own. And it’s great resource to show all the ways the Church has been "seeking deep to hide their counsels from the Lord." The Church has completely abandoned the U.S. Constitution, and only gives lip service to religious freedom. There is one quote from Elder Oaks in the document that should be bone-chilling for any who understand the real difference between the Bill of Rights and the UN's Universal Declaration of Rights. Many members of the Church believe that Oaks is a champion of religious freedom because of his lip service to it. In reality, nothing is further from the truth. Here is what this retired judge said:

As advocates of religious freedom, we must yield to the fact that in a nation with citizens of many different religions or disbeliefs, the government must sometimes limit the right of some to act upon their beliefs when it is necessary to protect the health, safety and welfare of all. (Source, Emphasis added)

Now compare this statement to the stipulations on religious freedom that are found in the United Nations International Covenant on Human Rights that was ratified by President Bush Sr. in 1992:

Freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health , or morals… (Source, Emphasis added) 

It's as if Oaks was reading from the same document. As you can see, the only religious freedom he supports is whatever the State approves. The Bill of Rights states, “Congress shall make no law”… period, meaning it’s unconditional. Why isn’t Oaks deferring to it? Surely as a lawyer he must be familiar with America’s founding documents and their original intent. Surely as a Mormon that has lived through the days of David O. McKay and Ezra Taft Benson he understands the difference between inalienable rights and those granted by the State.

Of course he knows the difference. He is manipulating words to deceive you. A tell-tale sign of a conspirator is someone who has no loyalty to his home country or the freedom of its people; someone willing to sell out their own countrymen for the “greater good” of whatever group they’ve sworn oaths to. Whatever new direction the Russellites are taking the corporate Church, it is away from liberty and toward globalism. 

Here is the document. Remember what Moroni said, "by their works ye shall know them."

The Church and the Gadiantons

Before I end I'm going to share some anecdotal evidence that the LDS Church has been infiltrated by Luciferians, just as the Melbourne man said they would be. This account comes from D. Christian Markham's second volume of There Are Save Two Churches Only, and it involves Thomas S. Monson, whom Markham identifies as a "Luciferian Infiltrator." Markham personally interviewed a woman named Gail Smith, who was in the same ward with Monson when he was a bishop. Before you dismiss her allegations out of hand, keep in mind that this is a first-hand eye-witness account, which holds up in court much better than second or third hand testimony. (Remember, the Church has built an entire pseudo history of Joseph Smith's polygamy on noncontemporaneous second-hand testimony; the only contemporary testimony we have are of Joseph and Hyrum condemning the practice.) This is Gail's testimony, there is no other proof to substantiate this; the only way to know the truth is by the power of the Holy Ghost, please pray for it as you read. Remember, sometimes to understand the things of God our minds must "contemplate the lowest considerations of the darkest abyss" to reveal "the hidden things of darkness":

In regards to Monson, I believe the testimony of Gail Smith. Her account has been circulated on the Internet somewhat, but I have spoken with her extensively, several times. When she was a young woman, Monson served as her bishop. She testified that at one time she rode in his car, and in a secluded area he pulled over and tried to sexually force himself on her. When she refused and fought back, he stated "Don't you know I'm going to be the prophet some day?" (I can safely assume this kind of 'prophecy' was not given to him by the Lord.) Gail got out of the vehicle and started walking away. Moments later, Monson pulled up along side her, apologized and begged her to get back into the car, promising not to do anything except drive her home. She eventually conceded, and he drove her home.

Gail told me this from her own mouth. I believe her. She is not the least bit vindictive; she is forgiving. However, the truth is the truth, and she knows that Monson needs to be exposed for who he is: a wolf/Luciferian infiltrator. (Two Churches Only, Volume II, p. 413) 

Postscript: Links

Any case anyone missed the link the document. Here it is again:

The Church and the Gadiantons 

Is Zion a "Sustainable Society"?

 Previously: Throw Down Their Tower and Scatter Their Watchmen

In the Saturday morning session of the October 2020 General conference, D. Todd Christofferson gave a talk entitled, Sustainable Societies, in which he compared Zion societies in scripture with the goals of UN Agenda 2030. Specifically, he referenced the city of Enoch and the Nephite society at Bountiful in 4th Nephi as examples of "sustainable" cities that we can compare the 17 goals of agenda 2030 with. 

This post will be a rebuttal to Christofferson’s talk, but first I'll explain the communist origins of the UN and the esoteric and satanic symbolism of its logo. Right off the bat we have to know that the talk was designed as propaganda to subtly indoctrinate the LDS people into being more accepting of globalism and international law. After all, it was stated by Sharon Eubanks, first counselor of the General Relief Society presidency, at the G20 Interfaith Forum that "Agenda 2030 won't happen without religion," and that it is the job of "trusted faith leaders" to push Covid vaccines onto the members. This entire campaign may be an attempt to “inoculate” Latter-day Saints against conservative ideas that dominated the general membership of the Church for so long. Church leaders may be attempting to purge out the last vestiges of the Bensonites, who are radically and justifiably opposed to global government and socialism. There just may be no more room in the Church for these good people. 

The United Nations is a communist organization, and the principles of communism are diametrically opposed to the principles of Christ and his gospel. President David O. McKay uttered the following words long ago when Church leaders were more concerned about personal liberty:

The entire concept and philosophy of Communism is diametrically opposed to everything for which the Church stands... (Official Statement of the First Presidency, April 9, 1966)

My how the times have changed. What Christofferson is suggesting here is that we attempt to serve two masters, but you cannot serve God and mammon, or Christ and Babylon. Zion will not be brought about through guidelines from a global organization of how to create "sustainable societies." It will brought about by the power of God, the sealing power that can "break mountains... divide the seas... dry up waters..." and "put at defiance the armies of nations" (See JST Genesis 14:30-31). It will likely be UN troops who God will have to "put at defiance" by his servant who will hold this power. Do not be deceived by Christofferson's talk, trusting in the UN will only bring destruction and bondage. With that said, let's dive into the communistic and occult origins of the United Nations.

Genocidal War to Bring About "Peace"

It's no secret now that President Woodrow Wilson deliberately embroiled the U.S. into WWI so he could

justify world government to establish "peace" forever. The "Great War" was to be the war to end all wars because the plan to was to establish the League of Nations, the precursor of the UN. Wilson got the American people to support U.S. entry into the war by purposely provoking the Germans to sink the Lusitania, the Anglo-American passenger ship that was carrying war munitions from New York to London in the cargo area below the deck. Of course, this was unbeknownst to the hapless passengers who would shortly meet their watery demise. For more details, see chapter 10: Amalickiah and False Flag Operations of my book, War: A Book of Mormon Perspective, where I cover U.S. entry into both WWI and WWII.  (I have provided an option to click for a free PDF of the book on the right side of this blog.) 

In January of 1918, Wilson proposed his 14 points of peace that would heavily influence the Treaty of  Versailles in June of 1919. They were written by Wilson's alter-ego and most trusted advisor, "Colonel" Edward Mandell House, who wasn't a colonel at all. He was a 33rd degree freemason, deeply involved in the occult, and a lackey of JP Morgan bank. Morgan was the owner of the Lusitania, as well as the financier of Wilson's presidential campaign. House wrote a short novel entitled, Philip Dru: Administrator, about a presidential advisor who saves the world through war and administrative policy. The book is a dystopian road map to world government and universal slavery. Along with the 14 points, the League of Nations was also the brainchild of House. Most of the points cover methods of subtly undermining the sovereignty of individual nations, but the 14th point calls for the establishment of the League of Nations itself, the real goal of U.S. involvement in the war. 

The number 14 has deep occult underpinnings. In the first post of my Mystery Babylon series, the fable of Osiris is explained in depth. After Osiris is murdered by his brother Set, his body is cut up into 14 pieces and scattered all over Egypt, or the world. His wife, Isis, searches Egypt over and finds them all except the phallus, or the penis. This is represented by the mystery schools as the obelisk, and you can find them everywhere in modern architecture. Because the phallus was not recovered, Isis fashioned one herself and used it to raise Osiris back to life temporarily for one more union, the result of which was the child Horus, the sun god. Hence, the phallus represents the generative force, which is what the G in freemasonry stands for. The League of Nations was intended to be the generative force that Mystery Babylon would use to enslave the profane: you and I. But it was voted down, and Wilson's pipe dream would have to await fulfillment until the advent of WWII.

Like Wilson and House, FDR was a fellow Masonic brother, and not above the reproach of sacrificing U.S. citizens for the higher purpose of world government. FDR and secretary of state Henry Stimson were vexed with the task of how to maneuver the Japanese into the "position of firing the first shot without allowing too much danger to ourselves." An eight-point plan was conjured and implemented in 1940, deliberately designed to provoke the Japanese into attacking first. The wing-man for this mission was Lieutenant Commander Arthur H. McCollum, who was born in Japan and spoke the language fluently. The plan included embargoes on oil, freezing Japanese assets in American banks, sending naval submarines and heavy cruisers close to Japanese patrolled waters, and moving the pacific fleet to Hawaii. FDR charged the navy with conducting what he called "pop-up" cruises, where submarines and cruisers would encroach in Japanese waters just enough to intimidate them. 

Japan refused the bait for months but finally capitulated when they were running low on resources. They were cornered and saw no other way than to attack. As luck would have it, a distant solar storm bounced seven encoded Japanese messages right into American Naval intercept stations days before the bombardment. FDR had full knowledge of the impending attack on Pearl Harbor, but chose to withhold the information from the Pacific Fleet. You know the rest of the story: three-thousand innocent servicemen were killed and the U.S. entered the war as the good guys, defeated the Germans and eventually Japan, and emerged as a world superpower. What you probably don't know is that FDR and Churchill made a secret agreement with Stalin at the Yalta Conference in 1945, in which he was allowed to enslave one-third of the world under the Eastern Bloc countries. For anyone needing proof of what I am saying please read, I saw Poland Betrayed, by Arthur Bliss Lane, former U.S. ambassador to Poland, for a first hand account of the events. 

It was that same year, 1945, that delegates from all over the world attended a meeting in San Francisco to discuss a plan for an international governing body. According to G. Edward Griffin, in his book, The Fearful Master: A Second Look at the United Nations, the foundation of the UN was laid by scheming communists. 

Griffin quotes Earl Browder, the Communist Party leader at the time who admitted the following in his book, Victory and After:

The American Communists worked energetically and tirelessly to the foundations for the United Nations, which we were sure would come into existence. (The Fearful Master, p. 70)

Furthermore, the Communist Party produced periodicals and pamphlets stressing the importance of capitalist countries joining the international body, and proclaiming that it would "outlaw war." What the Communists really wanted was a world-government with the Soviet Union at the helm, as is obvious from this quote from a lecture delivered by General Bondarenko at the Frunze Military Academy in Moscow:

From the rostrum of the United Nations, we shall convince the colonial and semi-colonial people to liberate themselves and spread the Communist theory all over the world. We recognize the UN has no authority over the Soviet Union, but the United Nations serves to deflect the capitalists and warmongers in the Western World. (Ibid, p. 71)

The goals of the United Nations were nothing but the tenets of the old Comintern, the Communist International established by Lenin himself, summarized by Griffin as follows:

1. Socialize the economies of all nations.

2. Bring about the regional unions of various groupings of these socialized nations.

3. Amalgamate all of these regional groupings into a final worldwide union of socialist states. (p. 69) 

Also consider that the UN Charter, which you can view and read here, sets up an international governing structure while declaring that it has no authority to intervene in the affairs of nations. If it has no authority to intervene why set up these governing bodies?:

There are established as the principle organs of the United Nations: a General Assembly, a Security Council, an Economic and Social Council, a Trusteeship Council, an International Court of Justice, and a Secretariat. (Article 7, Section 1)

If this organization has no authority to adjudicate then why would it need to set up an "International Court of Justice"? Can you see the Orwellian doublespeak that is going on here? This was political bait to ensnare the weaker nations of the world to give up their sovereignty inch by inch. Remember the term Fabianism? It is the slow and deliberate infiltration of socialist ideas and programs into every nation in the world. Like the frog slowly coming to a boil in a pot of water, Fabianism was designed to gradually enslave the world without it realizing until it was too late. 

In the deliberations that preceded the UN, the Soviet Union wanted a vote for every satellite country it was given in 1945. The "compromise" agreed upon was that it would be allowed three votes, full veto power in the Security Council, and a seat among the five permanent member countries. As Griffin points out in his book, all during the 1950s every UN Secretary-General was a Marxist. It was the Soviet Union who insisted that UN headquarters be established in New York City, as it allowed communist spies and saboteurs to easily enter the borders of America. And behind the scenes the international banking institutions were financing the entire thing. It was American corporations who were building up the Soviet empire and giving it a massive influence in the UN (Check out these books by Antony C. Sutton for the full story). This was all part of the plan. Remember the motto of the mystery schools, ordo ab chao, "order out of chaos." And since the UN was completely dominated by communists, could we expect anything other than the tenets outlined in the Communist Manifesto to be implemented by it?:

• Abolition of private property
• A heavy progressive income tax
• State control of all land and agriculture
• Control of all money and credit by the State, a national bank and with an exclusive monopoly over all money and credit.
• State control of all industry, corporations, and labor 
• Free and compulsory education

Most of these communist planks have already been instituted in the United States; the frog has begun to simmer, only hearing the soothing voices of babbling priestcraft sirens who are desperately trying to keep it from jumping out of the pot. The UN is doubling down on religion and Ecumenism, and as Sister Eubanks asserted, cannot be successful in its 2030 agenda without world religion and its leaders. But for those who have eyes to see and ears to hear, this nonsense has already been settled. God is not in the UN, neither indeed can be; it is just another "church" whose works are built upon men and the devil and "by and by the end cometh."

Signs, Symbols, and Logos Oh My

Now for the key in understanding the occult origins of the UN. We look at its symbols, because symbolism cannot lie; it always tells a story. This is a clue that God has given us to help us avoid deception. When God gives us commandments it is not just to give us something "not to do." It is also to teach us higher knowledge. The following commandment is one such example:

Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of anything in heaven above, or things which are in the earth beneath. (Mosiah 12:36, Emphasis added)

What is a graven image? If you look up the etymology of the word graven you get the following: to engrave, to carve, to chisel, to dig up, to inquire into, and to delve. In other words, it requires work, effort, and studious thought. The word image means reflection, and we all know that a reflection is not real. Thus, a graven image is an intense amount of work and effort put into something that is a fiction. But then God tells you not make them in the likeness of the heavens or the earth, and this is where the clues come in. The sun is in heaven above, and there are sun-worship symbols literally everywhere and in every society. The same goes for the moon and the stars (constellations/zodiac). And what's in the earth beneath? Things which we have made with our own hands: gold, silver, cities, civilizations, religious leaders, Hollywood, politicians, etc. The Lord commands that we make no graven image period, but the symbols of the United Nations are full of them. Here is a breakdown of the logo:

Right away we can see that this is an image of the sun: an orb surrounded by rays. Most of the time the rays are represented by the wings of a phoenix or eagle, but in this case it is the olive wreath. If you look to the right you can see that the orb is divided up into 33 parts, a well-known Masonic number. The sun enters each house of the zodiac at 30 degrees and leaves at the 33rd degree, and since no man can rise higher than the sun, the 33rd degree is the highest in Freemasonry. Now take another look. The bullseye in the middle of the circle represents the all-seeing eye of Horus, which really is the all-seeing eye of Lucifer. Now look again, a dot in the middle of a circle also looks like the head of a penis if you're looking straight on at it, this represents the phallus of Osiris, the lost key of freemasonry or the generative force. The mystery schools flaunt this by erecting (no pun intended) Egyptian obelisks everywhere (there is even one in Dealey Plaza where JFK was assassinated; yes that was a ritualized killing). Finally, the eye/phallus/generative force is in the middle of the globe surrounded by all the continents, symbolizing one-world government. 

The olive wreath is also a significant symbol and has a dual meaning. To the uninitiated, or the profane, the exoteric meaning is peace, victory and purity. But to the mystery adepts and the global elites the esoteric meaning goes much deeper. It symbolizes the victory of Zeus over Typhon at Mount Etna. But who cares about stupid Greek mythology anyway right? Well it turns out the UN does. 

This is a statue of our friend Zeus at the UN headquarters in New York, as you can see he's throwing an imaginary thunderbolt. So what's the big deal it's just a statue; wasn't Greek mythology everyone's favorite subject in high school? It's all for fun right?

Wrong. You have to realize that the pantheon of gods have only changed names, not meanings. Pagan gods and deities began with the Egyptians (at least after the flood), with Osiris and Isis and their parents, Ra and Rhea. The fable of Osiris has cycled through many cultures with only subtle changes in meaning. The original epic battle between good and evil was between Osiris and his brother Set. Osiris representing the sun, and Set representing darkness, or sun-set. The age-old skirmish between darkness and light.

Now I have covered this fable extensively in my post entitled Mystery Babylon: Into the Abyss, so I won't go into it here. But if you want to understand all of this read that as well. What I will tell you (spoiler alert) is that the mystery schools, Mystery Babylon, the great and abominable church of the devil, the whore of all the earth, and all the other names the scriptures give her, use Set as a code-name for Jesus Christ. And to them Set is the Prince of Darkness. This same story is told in the Disney movie The Lion King; Mufasa is Osiris, Simba is Horus, and Scar is Set. Scar is Jesus. So what does this have to do with Zeus and Typhon? Same gods different names. Set and Typhon are the same god. The olive wreath was given to Zeus for defeating Typhon, the ugly Titan monster who destroyed everything in his path. The mystery schools believe Christ to be the great destroyer, because he literally destroys wicked civilizations when they become ripened. Tell me friends, what god do you think the UN is adoring here? Because it is certainly not Jesus Christ. Osiris (sun) and Zeus (lightning) represent light, or Lucifer. Remember Lucifer's name means "light bearer." This statue represents Lucifer's victory over Christ, which never actually happened. Wrap your head around that. 

But there's even more to the olive wreath. This one will blow your mind. In Greek mythology the olive wreath was awarded as a crown to the winner of the ancient Olympic Games. It was plucked from the branch of the Kallistefanos Elea, or wild olive tree. The Plates of Brass prophet Zenos talked about two types of olive trees in his parable: wild and tame. In the beginning of the parable, the Lord likens the house of Israel to a tame olive tree, and when it begins to die he grafts in some of the branches of the wild olive tree to give it nutrients and spreads it all over the world/vineyard, but the wild olive trees eventually take over. After repeating this a few times he finally finds a "good spot of ground," choice above all others, but even that spot eventually became encumbered with bad fruit. Well, that spot is America, and the grafting in of the natural branches represents the restoration through Joseph Smith. And what happened? Zenos elaborates:

And now, behold, notwithstanding all the care which we have taken of my vineyard, the trees thereof have become corrupted, that they bring forth no good fruit; and these I had hoped to preserve, to have laid up fruit thereof against the season, unto mine own self. But, behold, they have become like unto the wild olive tree, and they are of no worth but to be hewn down and cast into the fire; and it grieveth me that I should lose them. (Jacob 5:46, Emphasis added) 

What is the meaning? God attempted to graft in the natural branches among the Gentiles through Joseph Smith and they rejected the fulness and corrupted the church. Now "they have become like unto the wild olive tree," partly because they have joined themselves to an organization that displays a wild olive tree in its logo. Can it be any more blatant? But if this doesn't convince you of the evilness of the United Nations, there is plenty more. Below is a picture of the UN's Meditation Room, also located at its headquarters.

This room was revamped in the 1950s under the direction of Dag Hammarskjold, one of the Marxist Secretary-Generals of the UN. It was changed from a prayer room to a mediation room at the behest of the World Council of Churches, under the auspices of religious tolerance. However, when you study the symbolism found in the room there is only one religion that fits: Luciferianism. 

First off, the shape of the room is trapezoidal. A trapezoid is an unfinished shape, kind of like a diminished cord in musical theory. More specifically it is an unfinished pyramid, and as such is symbolic of never reaching heaven or God. It has been used in occult and black magic rituals for centuries. Anton LeVay, the founder of the Church of Satan, based his church off of the "Order of the Trapezoid," established in the 1950s. In fact, there is an entire magical science based on geometric shapes, which is very much on display there in the Meditation Room, especially in the mural. By the way, Pope John Paul II requested to be buried in a trapezoidal coffin prior to his death. Check it out:

Interesting right? What god did this Pope worship? Definitely not Jesus. In fact, Dag Hammarskjold explained in the visitation center leaflet that there is a god that the stone altar is dedicated to:

But the stone in the middle of the room has more to tell us. We may see it as an altar, empty not because there is no God, not because it is an altar to an unknown god, but because it is dedicated to the God whom man worships under many names and in many forms. (The Cult of the All-Seeing Eye, by Robert Keith Spenser)

The god Mr. Hammarskjold is referring to cannot be Jesus Christ, who only has one name and one form.  I'll let you, dear reader, decide what god the UN pays homage to after you finish reading this post. 

When a person walks into the Meditation Room they will experience an "abrupt withdrawal from the outside world," and a "peculiar spatial disorientation." The stone altar is 4 ft. high and made of million-year-old crystalline iron ore. It was donated by the Swedish government and weights 6.5 tons, resting "on a concrete pillar that goes straight down to bedrock." This rock is known as a lodestone, or magnetite, and possesses strong polarity and magnetism. Hammarskjold also referred to the altar as the "cornerstone." This is a reference to the chief corner stone the builders rejected, a Masonic term for the light of Christ. But when you actually get into the lore it is not the light of Christ at all, but the light of Lucifer they are referring to. The cornerstone the builder's rejected is really just another name for illuminism, and this is where the term Illuminati came from. I have expounded on this in-depth in Mystery Babylon II: Superstition. Again, if you're new to this stuff it can be a lot to take in.

The stone altar has other implications. It could have reference to the ancient Stone of Foundation, which the Freemasons believe was placed in the Temple of Solomon. It was a "perfect cube, and had inscribed upon its upper face, within a delta or triangle, the sacred Tetagrammaton, or ineffable name of God." Tetra means four, and grammaton means letters, and the four letters representing the Hebrew name for God are YHWH, short for Yahweh or Jehovah. But make no mistake, the black stone cube does not represent Christ, it represents Lucifer. Remember Satan is jealous of Christ's glory and wants all the honor and adoration for himself, so he twists everything around to show that he is the good guy and Christ is the villain. 

Two attributes about the stone verify the fact that it's a tribute to Satan: the color black and its cubed nature. Black has long been associated with witchcraft, "black" magic, sorcery, and devil worship. It is also associated with the planet Saturn, which is where we get our word Saturday from. Saturn was the Roman name for Osiris, whom the Greeks called Kronos. He was the god of rigidity, conformity and punishment. The Romans celebrated the festival of Saturnalia in late December with feasts and gift giving, in the hopes of receiving an abundant agricultural yield. Judges wear black robes today in observance of Saturn, symbolizing their punitive authority. The cube was also symbolic of Saturn, and this is why college graduates wear the square hat and tassel, it represents the cube and the fact that they are now an alumni, or illuminated. Of course they are not really illuminated, they have been educated in a system that was meant to deceive them because they are among the profane, and can only understand the exoteric meaning of the square hat, which most people merely associate with graduation without ever thinking twice about it. 

The stone and the cube have also long been associated with pagan worship, and "the 'stone,' the metal altar, in its stark setting in that Room is in itself a symbol of idolatry." Stone worship dates back to ancient civilizations, many of whom worshipped the sun. The Druids built Stone Hedge in a circle representing the sun, and the Egyptians tracked the sun god Horus’ 12 steps across the sky as hours. The cubed stone was symbolic of the strength of the pagan gods who were worshipped. According to Spenser:

To use the language of Dudley, the pillar or stone was adapted as a symbol of strength and firmness--a symbol, also, of divine power, and, by a read inference, a symbol or idol of the Deity himself... the god Hermes [Mercury] was represented without hands or feet, being a cubical stone, because the cubical figure betokened his solidity and stability. (The Cult of the All-Seeing Eye, p. 14., all quotations in the last few paragraphs have been from this book and I highly recommend reading it, click here for a PDF)

The god Hermes is where we get the symbol of the Caduceus, or the medical staff. His was also known as Mercury, which comes from the Latin word merx, which means merchants. For it is merchants who control the medical and pharmaceutical industries (see this post to find out where the word pharma comes from). The medical staff is a rod with a small circle at the top and two snakes wrapped around it. The snakes represent polarity, the ying and the yang, and sexual copulation. The rod represents the priests of Pharaoh who had "black" magical powers, and the circle at the top represents the sun. Here is the logo of the World Health Organization:

I am not sure why they only have one snake on this logo, but it's clear that it represents Hermes, the god who is symbolized by the stone cube. They obviously want to use medicine to control the masses of the world, as we have seen them aggressively attempt in the last few years with Covid-19. 

Now let's have a closer look at the mural:

This fresco was painted by Bo Beskow, "an old friend of Dag Hammarskjold." It took him a month to finish it. It was designed to give the room depth and to provoke meditation. He claimed that it "contained no intentional symbols," and was simply a place for the eye to wander. This, as we shall see, was a lie. The painting is full of geometry and mathematics, with calculated and precise meaning.  Here is what a mystic said about "real art":

The mystic, P.D. Ouspensky, has written that in "real art nothing is accidental. It is mathematics. Everything in it can be calculated, everything can be known beforehand. The artist knows and understands what he wants to convey and his work cannot produce one impression on one man and another impression on another, presuming, of course, [they are] people on one level... At the same time the same work of art will produce different impressions on people of different levels. And people from lower levels will never receive from it what people of higher levels receive. This is real, objective art... An objective work of art... affects the emotional and not only the intellectual side of man."(As quoted by Spenser, p. 9)

The mural was painted with a purposeful duality: the exoteric meaning meant for the profane, and the esoteric meaning meant for the initiated.  For the profane, it is meant to induce a feeling of confusion and bewilderment, because the confused are more likely to submit to and obey authority. For the initiated, it is a reminder of the god they worship. Consider this quote from an expert on cubed art:

Cubist art is an effort to produce certain psychic effects obtainable by optical illusion. Beauty has nothing to do with it. The cubist school is not the realm of art at all. it belongs to that of medicine and psychic science. (Spenser, p. 17)

The mural is a form of mind control to the uninitiated. Let's dive into the symbolism, I recommend looking at the picture of the mural with each bullet point:

•  The entire mural is asymmetrically arranged into a "Magic Square." This square contains 9 cells arranged like a game of tick-tack-toe. The numbers that fill the cells equal the sum of 15 whether they are added vertically, horizontally, or diagonally. The number 15 is another form of the name of God in Hebrew, JAH. But again, this is not Christ they are alluding to here, it is Lucifer.
• The dark blue rectangle in the center of the mural represents the altar. The tilted yellow rectangle also represents the altar. Both altars represent duality, the yellow (the sun), and the blue (the earth).
• The white half-crescent in the upper right quadrant represents one side of the sun. If it is continued full circle it wraps around the half-grey, half black all-seeing eye in the middle. Together this signifies the phallus, or the generative force. The crescent is also a symbol of the moon, the female principle, and fertility. The all-seeing eye represents Lucifer. 
• From Spenser: "There are 72 geometrical figures (and shadings) in the mural... The number 72 denoted from the earliest days the Divine Name of 72 words. This number is derived from a permutation of the values assigned to the four letters of the Tetragrammaton (JHVH: Jehovah)... Seventy-two is also the number of the Quinaries or sets of five degrees in the 360 degrees of the Zodiac." Again, their god is NOT Jehovah. (p. 18)
• There are 22 of each of the following triangles in the mural: isosceles, equilateral, scalene, and right-angled. There are 22 letters in the ancient Hebrew alphabet. Triangles symbolize Deity, as well as both the male and female element depending on whether it is pointing up or down. A black and inverted triangle represents Lucifer. 
• From Spenser: "The spiral figure intertwined with the mural-length diagonal line symbolizes the Caduceus of Hermes (Mercury), which mythologically is represented as two serpents twined around the winged band of Mercury. Nine arcs are formed by the intersections of the spiral line with the diagonal; the ninth Hebrew letter, Teth, with the value of nine, has the signification of 'serpent.' The number of the beast is 666, which cabalistically is nine, the number of generation. The twin serpents of the caduceus are negative and positive (representing polarity) and twine around the spinal column... The caduceus is also the symbol of peace, the propaganda term associated with the U.N." (p. 18)

The Meditation Room is positioned in such a way that when a person walks into it they are coming from the north and heading northeast. This signifies walking from darkness into light. The sun rises in the east and is the source of all light. Thus, this symbolizes the advancement of an initiate from ignorance to knowledge. Nothing about the Meditation Room has anything to do with Jesus Christ. It is steeped in the occult, the esoteric, and the Satanic. Every member of the LDS Church, a church who feigns the worship of Christ, should ask themselves what in the world the Brethren and Sistren of the Church are doing supporting this evil organization.

Finally, the UN has its own publishing company that prints and disseminates propaganda materials; it's called The Lucis Trust. Lucis is Latin for light. It has an interesting history to say the least. It was established in 1922 as The Lucifer Trust company by Alice Bailey and Helena Blavatsky. You read that right, The Lucifer Trust, and they published their books under the Lucifer Publishing Company. Realizing they were over-zealous, they changed the name to Lucis Trust in 1925 to make their existence more palatable to the public. Blavatsky had founded the Theosophical Society in 1875, an occult think-tank dedicated to the tenets of Luciferianism. She authored several books on the occult, including an entire series in the Lucifer Collection, the most blatant title being The Secret Doctrine of Lucifer. Alice Bailey was no less prolific in occult writings. One of her most well-known books is Education for a New Age, in which she raves about how man is merely an animal that needs to be controlled, and that world citizenship in a world government is the highest goal we can strive for. The Lucis Trust is still publishing materials for the UN today, here is a link to their website. If you visit the site you see that the logo is an occult triangle that is steeped in New Age symbolism. You will also see a major theme called "World Goodwill," this is associated with the UN and is code for New World Order. 

To get an idea of who these people are we need to take a look at the Theosophical Society. The major tenets of this group parrot the mystery school philosophies that I wrote about here. Some of the main teachings are as follows:

• Denouncement of the divine authority and mission of Christ and the claim that man needs no Savior.
• Claiming that man can progress to become a god through knowledge and intellect instead of through being "saved."
• Claiming that man's soul goes through multiple reincarnations in his journey of ascension.
• Claiming that human evolution is the process and path to enlightenment. 
• Asserting that the highest goal of reincarnation is reaching the spiritual status of a Theosophist, or "the fullness of God." 
• Claiming that all the great world teachers, including Christ, have reached this status and are there to help us ascend. 

The Lucis Trust is an anti-Christian organization, any teaching that diminishes the divinity of Christ is Satanic. These are the types of organizations the LDS Church is now supporting. This should be a sobering thought and give all Latter-Day Saints great pause. The Lucis Trust was established in New York City, and at one time its office held the address of 666 United Nations Plaza. It is also a member of the Economic and Social Council of the UN, the brainchild of the UN's program for "sustainable development." If all this is not enough proof for you of the occult nature of the UN, consider this quote from Alice Bailey in a 1955 magazine published by Lucis Trust:

Evidence of the growth of human intellect along the needed receptive lines [for the preparation of the New Age] can be seen in the "planning" of various nations and in the efforts of the United Nations to formulate a world plan... From the very start of this unfoldment, three occult factors have governed the development of all these plans. (Alice B. Bailey, Discipleship in the New Age (Lucis Press, 1955), Vol. II, p. 35)

She never spells out exactly what the "three occult factors" are, but she really doesn't need to. There is plenty of other evidence pointing to the Satanic origins and influence of the UN. The main thing to realize is that the UN has been planned by the mystery schools for a long time. World government has been the goal of Satan ever since he made his first oath with Cain. Even as far back as the Knight's Templar, plans were being made to establish international banking institutions and global organizations. Remember, there is nothing new under the sun, Satan is doing "that which has been done in other worlds," and he knows his craft well. Don't be deceived by these organizations that speak flattering words to us. Remember the words of Moroni:

Wherefore, take heed, my beloved brethren, that ye do not judge that which is evil to be of God, or that which is good and of God to be of the devil. For behold, my brethren, it is given unto to judge, that ye may know good from evil; and the way to judge is as plain, that ye may know with a perfect knowledge, as the daylight is from the dark night. (Moroni 7:14-15)

For some extra study, here is a video from Bill Cooper's the Hour of the Time radio show where he repeats much of this information and adds his own commentary:

The Bill of Rights has been Replaced

In the video below, G. Edward Griffin is speaking to a group of patriots about the dangers of the United Nations in 1972. If you start at the 30-minute mark, you will hear him talk about a document called the United Nations Draft of the International Covenant on Human Rights. You can read it here. This was presented to the United States as a treaty in the 1960s. And if you are familiar with international law you know that when a treaty is ratified by a 2/3 vote in the Senate it becomes the supreme law of the land. Griffin asserts that the supreme court decided this policy a long time ago. He said that if ever ratified, this treaty would replace the Bill of Rights. Well, the Senate finally passed the treaty in 1992, and Bush Sr. ratified it. You can read about that here. And here is the video:

The language of the document is pleasant and carnally appealing. It outlines all of our rights and privileges, even including clean water, healthy food, healthcare, education, etc. But the problem is that the UN conception of rights is based upon the false idea that rights are granted by the State. The American Bill of Rights was based upon the premise that our rights come from the Creator, and are inalienable, which literally means unsellable. Our rights have now been sold, and have become alienable, to be determined by a bunch of foreigners. And certain items claimed as rights in the document cannot logically be rights at all... like water, food, healthcare, education, etc. These things can only be rights to one group at the expense of another. Thus, they create financial duties involving the confiscation of property from the productive class. Another name for that is legal plunder. And remember what my favorite Libertarian philosopher said? Government is nothing but "a secret band of robbers and murderers." The only difference on the global stage is that their ability to murder and plunder is multiplied exponentially.

Each human right that is outlined in the International Covenant on Human Rights comes with a caveat, stipulation, or condition. I'll give you an example. Article 18 reads as follows:

Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right shall include freedom to have or adopt a religion or belief of his choice, and freedom, either individually or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching... Freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health, or morals or the fundamental rights and freedom of others. (p. 10, Emphasis added)

Notice the wording: freedom to practice your religions may be subject to limitations as prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health, or morals. Every right is followed by a similar sentence. This means that if the United Nations ever becomes the world-one government, they can simply say that Christianity is unsafe for public consumption and pass a law against it. This document does not guarantee a single right. And furthermore, if a religious belief gets in the way of their conception of public safety and health, like say a religious vaccination exemption, they can simply deny it. 

There was another document written by the UN which they call the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This is the one that everyone refers to when they talk about how great the UN is. It repeats all the rights and privileges that are printed in the International Covenant on Human Rights, but leaves out the caveats and stipulations. This one is for the lay people, the other one is for politicians and is the one now binding on us because of its ratification in 1992. However, if you read all the way to the end of the Universal Declaration, you find that it is also conditional. Here is what Article 29 says:

Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible. In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedom of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society. These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations. (P. 108, Emphases added)

The two sentences that I bolded and italicized above make every single right conditional and null and void if the Security Council decides so. These are the crafty words of an organization that is attempting to establish a one-world socialistic totalitarian dictatorship. If you listen to Mr. Griffin's 1972 speech that I posted in the YouTube video above, you will hear parts of the Soviet Union's constitution, which eerily contains much of the same language of the International Covenant on Human Rights. Every right and privilege is followed by the stipulation that such can be restricted or limited as prescribed by law. This wording allows a loophole for the government to do whatever they want. And furthermore, in either of the UN documents I've cited here, there are no articles guaranteeing property rights or the right to bear arms or to replace the government if it becomes tyrannical. 

Now, let's jump ahead to Agenda 2030, the plan for "sustainable development" that Elder Christofferson finds so noble and worthy of emulation. Here is the PDF of it if you're hard up for some dry reading. I'll just summarize the 17 bullet points:

• End poverty. 
• End hunger. 
• Ensure health for all. 
• Ensure inclusive and equitable education.
• Achieve gender equality.
• Ensure clean water and sanitation for all.
• Ensure access to affordable and sustainable energy.
• Promote sustained and inclusive economic growth.
• Build resilient infrastructure and sustainable industrialization.
• Reduce inequality among countries. 
• Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, and sustainable.
• Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns.
• Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts.
• Conserve and sustainably use the oceans.
• Conserve the environment and ecosystems.
• Promote peace and inclusive societies and institutions.
• Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the Global Partnership for Sustainable Development.

Agenda 2030 is the same program as Agenda 21 that was being pushed back in the 1990s. The difference is that Agenda 21 was a general goal for the 21st Century, while Agenda 2030 is a goal for a specific year, this is what makes it scary. That means we only have 8 years to stop it, and trust me, there are a lot of good folks trying to do just that. Instead of trying to explain exactly what the world under Agenda 2030 would look like, I'm going to suggest the video below. This woman is an activist who is working hard to expose what the UN is actually up to with this agenda:

Basically they want to confiscate all the rural land of the entire earth and force everyone into big cities where they can be monitored under constant surveillance. There would be no property rights, no privacy, no private transportation, no health freedom, no economic freedom, and eventually no religious freedom. It would be a dystopian hell on earth; Orwell's 1984 on stilts. There would be no representative government, no local government, and no elective process. Big Brother would operate in a far away land without a name and without a face, yet all would be forced to bow to him and "worship the beast," while those who refused would lose their heads. 

Furthermore, the lofty goals of Agenda 2030 could never be accomplished by fiat. You cannot legislate poverty, hunger, and inequality out of existence. The Soviets tried to do it and ended up murdering around 40 million of their own citizens, the Chinese murdered 70 million. Just consider that every time the U.S. government has declared a war on an idea or a thing like drugs, poverty, terror, etc., it has only made things worse. Society has to be changed from the inside, through the actions and endeavors of individuals exercising their free agency. Zion can only be brought about through voluntary means, and only through the doctrine of Christ. It is only through Christ that Zion will be possible at all. Governments, leaders, global institutions, and religions will have nothing to do with it. In fact, the scriptures tell us that they will be actively fighting against it. 

No, D. Todd, Zion will not be a "Sustainable Society"

There will be nothing "sustainable" about the coming Zion in any worldly sense. It will be devoid of governing bodies, world leaders, religious organizations, or other strong men or institutions. It will lack centralization and authoritarianism. There will only be one ruler, the King of Heaven, Jesus Christ, who will reign with equity and justice. Although Elder Christofferson makes lip service to the Savior and the doctrine of Christ in the talk, it is clear that he is advocating Agenda 2030 as the standard that Zion societies should be based upon. He begins the first paragraph with what he thinks that standard is:

... no poverty, zero hunger, quality education, gender equality, clean water and sanitation, and decent work. (Sustainable Societies)

In the next paragraph he asserts that "we have scriptural record of at least two such thriving societies." Can you see what he did here? He introduces the standard, Agenda 2030, and then introduces the two Zion societies as if they were patterned after it. This is brilliant and subtle propaganda to get the members of the Church to equate Zion with Agenda 2030. But the Lord's Zion and the United Nations are diametrically opposed, as David O. McKay stated all those years ago. You cannot serve two masters, Elder Christofferson; a Babylonian idea, program, concept, or law can NEVER bring about Zion. Communism is NOT the same thing as "having all things in common." The very simple and plain difference between Communism and the United Order is free agency. One allows it and one does not. Agenda 2030 is clearly Communism.

Throughout his talk Christofferson makes lip service to good principles that are hard to disagree with such as: personal accountability, not trusting in the arm of flesh, integrity, compassion, marriage and fidelity, respect for others and their property, and the necessity and dignity of work. There is nothing wrong with any of these noble concepts, but he omits one very important, and I might add the most important one of all: Free Agency. Never once throughout the entire talk does he suggest that the lofty goals of Agenda 2030 and Zion can be accomplished using our free agency. The talk is completely and strangely silent on personal liberty and freedom. In fact, in one part of the talk he actually advocates against personal liberty:

A society, for example, in which individual consent is the only restraint on sexual activity is a society in decay. (Emphasis added)

Now I won't argue that sexual promiscuity doesn't cause heartache and misery in a society. But what does he mean by individual consent being the only restraint?  What is he suggesting? That there be other restraints imposed by those who govern society? He doesn't clarify what those restraints might be, but if something is no longer left up to individual consent, then we're talking about legislation against personal choice. Sexual sin is condemned throughout scripture but there are never secular laws against it except in the case of adultery, which is actually a breach of covenant and contract. Fornication is never punished by law in the Book of Mormon, it only carries spiritual consequences, and of course the risk of disease and unplanned pregnancy. If Elder Christofferson is willing to allow the State to intervene in personal choices involving sexual activity, then what other socialistic programs is he willing to endorse? Obviously, he endorses all those outlined in Agenda 2030.

In another part of the talk Christofferson makes a glaring statement of hypocrisy. This one has to do with trusting in the arm of flesh:

I think it safe to say that when people turn from a sense of accountability to God and begin to trust in the "arm of flesh," disaster lurks. Trusting in the arm of flesh is to ignore the divine Author of human rights and human dignity and to give the highest priority to riches, power, and the praise of the world (while often mocking and persecuting those who follow a different standard). 

I totally agree with this statement, but this is a case of the pot calling the kettle black. First of all, comparing Agenda 2030 with Zion is trusting in the arm of flesh. It's mingling the philosophies of men with scripture and then saying the former created the scripture. Second, to ignore the divine Author of human rights is to promote an agenda that says that rights are granted by the State, and not God. And lastly, it's obvious from the news coming out as of late about the Church's hedge fund that it does not use to help the poor, its financial and rhetorical support of the UN, and its incessance on the follow the prophet doctrine, that it does "give the highest priority to riches, power, and the praise of the world."

And what about mocking and persecution? Every time the Church has someone excommunicated for "apostasy" they are engaging in this very thing. Most of the time it is because the person no longer sustains the Brethren and is speaking out to others about the things he or she sees happening in the church today that are antithetical to the gospel.

So how does the Lord actually describe His Zion? All one need do is read the entire chapter of 4th Nephi to see that Christofferson's talk is all smoke and mirrors. It is not the real thing. Zion is not and will never be a "sustainable society" because it is based upon individual freedom and God's law. Consider these words from the Book of Mormon, and decide for yourself whether Elder Christofferson's description of Zion is accurate or not:

And they had all things common among them; therefore there were not rich and poor, bond and free, but they were all made free, and partakers of the heavenly gift...

And it came to pass that there was no contention in the land, because of the love of God which did dwell in the hearts of all the people. 

And there were no envyings, nor strifes, nor tumults, nor whoredoms, nor lyings, nor murders, nor any manner of lasciviousness; and surely there could not be a happier people among all the people who had been created by the hand of God.

There were no robbers, nor murderers, neither were there Lamanites, nor any manner of -ites; but they were in one, the children of Christ, and heirs to the kingdom of God. (4 Nephi 3, 15-17, Emphasis added) 

As you read in verse 3, they were all made free, a major point that Christofferson omitted from the talk. They accomplished all the ideals of a Zion society, i.e., no contention, no strife, no lying, no whoredoms, no rich, no poor, and no lasciviousness -all without government edict. They did it all without compulsory means. Without a global institution vying for global power. There were no robbers and murderers, which means no government at all. All were the Children of Christ, meaning they had all entered into covenant individually with him and had been spiritually begotten, another thing Christofferson makes no mention of in his talk.

Before I end this post I have to point out the elephant in the room. The scriptural smoking gun against the United Nations that is painfully obvious to those with eyes to see. It's almost as if Moroni was calling out the United Nations itself when he uttered this prophecy:

For it cometh to pass that whoso buildeth it [this secret combination] up seeketh to overthrow the freedom of all lands, nations, and countries; and it bringeth to pass the destruction of all people, for it is built up by the devil, who is the father of all lies, even that same liar who beguiled our first parents, yea, even that same liar who hath caused man to commit murder from the beginning; who hath hardened the hearts of men that they have murdered the prophets, and stoned them, and cast them out from the beginning. (Ether 8:25, Emphasis added)

What other organization on earth besides the UN could overthrow the freedom of all lands, nations and countries? Think of Agenda 2030; they want to confiscate all rural lands and force all people into small living quarters in big cities. What other organization is made up of nations and countries that convene and hold councils and votes that influence other nations and countries? Yes it is true that the real conspirators are the secret societies that make up Mystery Babylon and their front organizations like the Freemasons, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderbergers, the Committee of 300, the Knights of Malta, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the International Monetary Fund, and the Federal Reserve Bank. But the end-game of all the Deep State Globalists is one-world government, and what better front institution to achieve their dream through than the United Nations? 

What else did Moroni say? It is built up by the devil. If you study nothing else but the symbolism in the logo and Meditation Room at the UN headquarters, you will find Luciferianism behind every statue, every stone altar, and every painting. Satan has been working toward this goal for millennia. "Now is the great day" of his power. He wants to enslave you and he knows he has little time left to do it. And he has conscripted the churches of the world to help him, and the LDS Church, the one we used to count on to lambast communism and world government, has put its corporate shoulder to the wheel in building up the most powerful secret combination of all time. 

Postscript

Update 11-20-22:

Rebekah Griffin has produced two excellent videos on the role the LDS Church is playing in building up the United Nations.

Here is part I, which has been removed from YouTube:

And here is part II, just released on YouTube:

 

And speaking of the year 2030, Adrian Larsen has put up a blog series on prophecy and destruction, and it is mind blowing. Start with part 1:

Destruction, Part 1: A Man Among the Gentiles

Destruction, Part 2: Most Sacred Privilege

Destruction, Part 3: Four Hundred Years Passeth Not Away

Destruction, Part 4: Keep Failing

Destruction, Part 5: Destroyed

Destruction, Part 6: Four Passovers

Destruction Part 7: Murder and Gain