Print Friendly and PDF

Sunday, March 20, 2022

Is Zion a "Sustainable Society"?

 Previously: Throw Down Their Tower and Scatter Their Watchmen

In the Saturday morning session of the October 2020 General conference, D. Todd Christofferson gave a talk entitled, Sustainable Societies, in which he compared Zion societies in scripture with the goals of UN Agenda 2030. Specifically, he referenced the city of Enoch and the Nephite society at Bountiful in 4th Nephi as examples of "sustainable" cities that we can compare the 17 goals of agenda 2030 with. 

This post will be a rebuttal to Christofferson’s talk, but first I'll explain the communist origins of the UN and the esoteric and satanic symbolism of its logo. Right off the bat we have to know that the talk was designed as propaganda to subtly indoctrinate the LDS people into being more accepting of globalism and international law. After all, it was stated by Sharon Eubanks, first counselor of the General Relief Society presidency, at the G20 Interfaith Forum that "Agenda 2030 won't happen without religion," and that it is the job of "trusted faith leaders" to push Covid vaccines onto the members. This entire campaign may be an attempt to “inoculate” Latter-day Saints against conservative ideas that dominated the general membership of the Church for so long. Church leaders may be attempting to purge out the last vestiges of the Bensonites, who are radically and justifiably opposed to global government and socialism. There just may be no more room in the Church for these good people. 

The United Nations is a communist organization, and the principles of communism are diametrically opposed to the principles of Christ and his gospel. President David O. McKay uttered the following words long ago when Church leaders were more concerned about personal liberty:
The entire concept and philosophy of Communism is diametrically opposed to everything for which the Church stands... (Official Statement of the First Presidency, April 9, 1966)
My how the times have changed. What Christofferson is suggesting here is that we attempt to serve two masters, but you cannot serve God and mammon, or Christ and Babylon. Zion will not be brought about through guidelines from a global organization of how to create "sustainable societies." It will brought about by the power of God, the sealing power that can "break mountains... divide the seas... dry up waters..." and "put at defiance the armies of nations" (See JST Genesis 14:30-31). It will likely be UN troops who God will have to "put at defiance" by his servant who will hold this power. Do not be deceived by Christofferson's talk, trusting in the UN will only bring destruction and bondage. With that said, let's dive into the communistic and occult origins of the United Nations.

Genocidal War to Bring About "Peace"

It's no secret now that President Woodrow Wilson deliberately embroiled the U.S. into WWI so he could
justify world government to establish "peace" forever. The "Great War" was to be the war to end all wars because the plan to was to establish the League of Nations, the precursor of the UN. Wilson got the American people to support U.S. entry into the war by purposely provoking the Germans to sink the Lusitania, the Anglo-American passenger ship that was carrying war munitions from New York to London in the cargo area below the deck. Of course, this was unbeknownst to the hapless passengers who would shortly meet their watery demise. For more details, see chapter 10: Amalickiah and False Flag Operations of my book, War: A Book of Mormon Perspective, where I cover U.S. entry into both WWI and WWII.  (I have provided an option to click for a free PDF of the book on the right side of this blog.) 

In January of 1918, Wilson proposed his 14 points of peace that would heavily influence the Treaty of  Versailles in June of 1919. They were written by Wilson's alter-ego and most trusted advisor, "Colonel" Edward Mandell House, who wasn't a colonel at all. He was a 33rd degree freemason, deeply involved in the occult, and a lackey of JP Morgan bank. Morgan was the owner of the Lusitania, as well as the financier of Wilson's presidential campaign. House wrote a short novel entitled, Philip Dru: Administrator, about a presidential advisor who saves the world through war and administrative policy. The book is a dystopian road map to world government and universal slavery. Along with the 14 points, the League of Nations was also the brainchild of House. Most of the points cover methods of subtly undermining the sovereignty of individual nations, but the 14th point calls for the establishment of the League of Nations itself, the real goal of U.S. involvement in the war. 

The number 14 has deep occult underpinnings. In the first post of my Mystery Babylon series, the fable of Osiris is explained in depth. After Osiris is murdered by his brother Set, his body is cut up into 14 pieces and scattered all over Egypt, or the world. His wife, Isis, searches Egypt over and finds them all except the phallus, or the penis. This is represented by the mystery schools as the obelisk, and you can find them everywhere in modern architecture. Because the phallus was not recovered, Isis fashioned one herself and used it to raise Osiris back to life temporarily for one more union, the result of which was the child Horus, the sun god. Hence, the phallus represents the generative force, which is what the G in freemasonry stands for. The League of Nations was intended to be the generative force that Mystery Babylon would use to enslave the profane: you and I. But it was voted down, and Wilson's pipe dream would have to await fulfillment until the advent of WWII.

Like Wilson and House, FDR was a fellow Masonic brother, and not above the reproach of sacrificing U.S. citizens for the higher purpose of world government. FDR and secretary of state Henry Stimson were vexed with the task of how to maneuver the Japanese into the "position of firing the first shot without allowing too much danger to ourselves." An eight-point plan was conjured and implemented in 1940, deliberately designed to provoke the Japanese into attacking first. The wing-man for this mission was Lieutenant Commander Arthur H. McCollum, who was born in Japan and spoke the language fluently. The plan included embargoes on oil, freezing Japanese assets in American banks, sending naval submarines and heavy cruisers close to Japanese patrolled waters, and moving the pacific fleet to Hawaii. FDR charged the navy with conducting what he called "pop-up" cruises, where submarines and cruisers would encroach in Japanese waters just enough to intimidate them. 

Japan refused the bait for months but finally capitulated when they were running low on resources. They were cornered and saw no other way than to attack. As luck would have it, a distant solar storm bounced seven encoded Japanese messages right into American Naval intercept stations days before the bombardment. FDR had full knowledge of the impending attack on Pearl Harbor, but chose to withhold the information from the Pacific Fleet. You know the rest of the story: three-thousand innocent servicemen were killed and the U.S. entered the war as the good guys, defeated the Germans and eventually Japan, and emerged as a world superpower. What you probably don't know is that FDR and Churchill made a secret agreement with Stalin at the Yalta Conference in 1945, in which he was allowed to enslave one-third of the world under the Eastern Bloc countries. For anyone needing proof of what I am saying please read, I saw Poland Betrayed, by Arthur Bliss Lane, former U.S. ambassador to Poland, for a first hand account of the events. 

It was that same year, 1945, that delegates from all over the world attended a meeting in San Francisco to discuss a plan for an international governing body. According to G. Edward Griffin, in his book, The Fearful Master: A Second Look at the United Nations, the foundation of the UN was laid by scheming communists. 

Griffin quotes Earl Browder, the Communist Party leader at the time who admitted the following in his book, Victory and After:

The American Communists worked energetically and tirelessly to the foundations for the United Nations, which we were sure would come into existence. (The Fearful Master, p. 70)

Furthermore, the Communist Party produced periodicals and pamphlets stressing the importance of capitalist countries joining the international body, and proclaiming that it would "outlaw war." What the Communists really wanted was a world-government with the Soviet Union at the helm, as is obvious from this quote from a lecture delivered by General Bondarenko at the Frunze Military Academy in Moscow:
From the rostrum of the United Nations, we shall convince the colonial and semi-colonial people to liberate themselves and spread the Communist theory all over the world. We recognize the UN has no authority over the Soviet Union, but the United Nations serves to deflect the capitalists and warmongers in the Western World. (Ibid, p. 71)

The goals of the United Nations were nothing but the tenets of the old Comintern, the Communist International established by Lenin himself, summarized by Griffin as follows:

1. Socialize the economies of all nations.

2. Bring about the regional unions of various groupings of these socialized nations.

3. Amalgamate all of these regional groupings into a final worldwide union of socialist states. (p. 69) 

Also consider that the UN Charter, which you can view and read here, sets up an international governing structure while declaring that it has no authority to intervene in the affairs of nations. If it has no authority to intervene why set up these governing bodies?:

There are established as the principle organs of the United Nations: a General Assembly, a Security Council, an Economic and Social Council, a Trusteeship Council, an International Court of Justice, and a Secretariat. (Article 7, Section 1)

If this organization has no authority to adjudicate then why would it need to set up an "International Court of Justice"? Can you see the Orwellian doublespeak that is going on here? This was political bait to ensnare the weaker nations of the world to give up their sovereignty inch by inch. Remember the term Fabianism? It is the slow and deliberate infiltration of socialist ideas and programs into every nation in the world. Like the frog slowly coming to a boil in a pot of water, Fabianism was designed to gradually enslave the world without it realizing until it was too late. 

In the deliberations that preceded the UN, the Soviet Union wanted a vote for every satellite country it was given in 1945. The "compromise" agreed upon was that it would be allowed three votes, full veto power in the Security Council, and a seat among the five permanent member countries. As Griffin points out in his book, all during the 1950s every UN Secretary-General was a Marxist. It was the Soviet Union who insisted that UN headquarters be established in New York City, as it allowed communist spies and saboteurs to easily enter the borders of America. And behind the scenes the international banking institutions were financing the entire thing. It was American corporations who were building up the Soviet empire and giving it a massive influence in the UN (Check out these books by Antony C. Sutton for the full story). This was all part of the plan. Remember the motto of the mystery schools, ordo ab chao, "order out of chaos." And since the UN was completely dominated by communists, could we expect anything other than the tenets outlined in the Communist Manifesto to be implemented by it?:

  • Abolition of private property
  • A heavy progressive income tax
  • State control of all land and agriculture
  • Control of all money and credit by the State, a national bank and with an exclusive monopoly over all money and credit.
  • State control of all industry, corporations, and labor 
  • Free and compulsory education

Most of these communist planks have already been instituted in the United States; the frog has begun to simmer, only hearing the soothing voices of babbling priestcraft sirens who are desperately trying to keep it from jumping out of the pot. The UN is doubling down on religion and Ecumenism, and as Sister Eubanks asserted, cannot be successful in its 2030 agenda without world religion and its leaders. But for those who have eyes to see and ears to hear, this nonsense has already been settled. God is not in the UN, neither indeed can be; it is just another "church" whose works are built upon men and the devil and "by and by the end cometh."

Signs, Symbols, and Logos Oh My

Now for the key in understanding the occult origins of the UN. We look at its symbols, because symbolism cannot lie; it always tells a story. This is a clue that God has given us to help us avoid deception. When God gives us commandments it is not just to give us something "not to do." It is also to teach us higher knowledge. The following commandment is one such example:
Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of anything in heaven above, or things which are in the earth beneath. (Mosiah 12:36, Emphasis added)

What is a graven image? If you look up the etymology of the word graven you get the following: to engrave, to carve, to chisel, to dig up, to inquire into, and to delve. In other words, it requires work, effort, and studious thought. The word image means reflection, and we all know that a reflection is not real. Thus, a graven image is an intense amount of work and effort put into something that is a fiction. But then God tells you not make them in the likeness of the heavens or the earth, and this is where the clues come in. The sun is in heaven above, and there are sun-worship symbols literally everywhere and in every society. The same goes for the moon and the stars (constellations/zodiac). And what's in the earth beneath? Things which we have made with our own hands: gold, silver, cities, civilizations, religious leaders, Hollywood, politicians, etc. The Lord commands that we make no graven image period, but the symbols of the United Nations are full of them. Here is a breakdown of the logo:

Right away we can see that this is an image of the sun: an orb surrounded by rays. Most of the time the rays are represented by the wings of a phoenix or eagle, but in this case it is the olive wreath. If you look to the right you can see that the orb is divided up into 33 parts, a well-known Masonic number. The sun enters each house of the zodiac at 30 degrees and leaves at the 33rd degree, and since no man can rise higher than the sun, the 33rd degree is the highest in Freemasonry. Now take another look. The bullseye in the middle of the circle represents the all-seeing eye of Horus, which really is the all-seeing eye of Lucifer. Now look again, a dot in the middle of a circle also looks like the head of a penis if you're looking straight on at it, this represents the phallus of Osiris, the lost key of freemasonry or the generative force. The mystery schools flaunt this by erecting (no pun intended) Egyptian obelisks everywhere (there is even one in Dealey Plaza where JFK was assassinated; yes that was a ritualized killing). Finally, the eye/phallus/generative force is in the middle of the globe surrounded by all the continents, symbolizing one-world government. 

The olive wreath is also a significant symbol and has a dual meaning. To the uninitiated, or the profane, the exoteric meaning is peace, victory and purity. But to the mystery adepts and the global elites the esoteric meaning goes much deeper. It symbolizes the victory of Zeus over Typhon at Mount Etna. But who cares about stupid Greek mythology anyway right? Well it turns out the UN does. 

This is a statue of our friend Zeus at the UN headquarters in New York, as you can see he's throwing an imaginary thunderbolt. So what's the big deal it's just a statue; wasn't Greek mythology everyone's favorite subject in high school? It's all for fun right?

Wrong. You have to realize that the pantheon of gods have only changed names, not meanings. Pagan gods and deities began with the Egyptians (at least after the flood), with Osiris and Isis and their parents, Ra and Rhea. The fable of Osiris has cycled through many cultures with only subtle changes in meaning. The original epic battle between good and evil was between Osiris and his brother Set. Osiris representing the sun, and Set representing darkness, or sun-set. The age-old skirmish between darkness and light.

Now I have covered this fable extensively in my post entitled Mystery Babylon: Into the Abyss, so I won't go into it here. But if you want to understand all of this read that as well. What I will tell you (spoiler alert) is that the mystery schools, Mystery Babylon, the great and abominable church of the devil, the whore of all the earth, and all the other names the scriptures give her, use Set as a code-name for Jesus Christ. And to them Set is the Prince of Darkness. This same story is told in the Disney movie The Lion King; Mufasa is Osiris, Simba is Horus, and Scar is Set. Scar is Jesus. So what does this have to do with Zeus and Typhon? Same gods different names. Set and Typhon are the same god. The olive wreath was given to Zeus for defeating Typhon, the ugly Titan monster who destroyed everything in his path. The mystery schools believe Christ to be the great destroyer, because he literally destroys wicked civilizations when they become ripened. Tell me friends, what god do you think the UN is adoring here? Because it is certainly not Jesus Christ. Osiris (sun) and Zeus (lightning) represent light, or Lucifer. Remember Lucifer's name means "light bearer." This statue represents Lucifer's victory over Christ, which never actually happened. Wrap your head around that. 

But there's even more to the olive wreath. This one will blow your mind. In Greek mythology the olive wreath was awarded as a crown to the winner of the ancient Olympic Games. It was plucked from the branch of the Kallistefanos Elea, or wild olive tree. The Plates of Brass prophet Zenos talked about two types of olive trees in his parable: wild and tame. In the beginning of the parable, the Lord likens the house of Israel to a tame olive tree, and when it begins to die he grafts in some of the branches of the wild olive tree to give it nutrients and spreads it all over the world/vineyard, but the wild olive trees eventually take over. After repeating this a few times he finally finds a "good spot of ground," choice above all others, but even that spot eventually became encumbered with bad fruit. Well, that spot is America, and the grafting in of the natural branches represents the restoration through Joseph Smith. And what happened? Zenos elaborates:

And now, behold, notwithstanding all the care which we have taken of my vineyard, the trees thereof have become corrupted, that they bring forth no good fruit; and these I had hoped to preserve, to have laid up fruit thereof against the season, unto mine own self. But, behold, they have become like unto the wild olive tree, and they are of no worth but to be hewn down and cast into the fire; and it grieveth me that I should lose them. (Jacob 5:46, Emphasis added) 

What is the meaning? God attempted to graft in the natural branches among the Gentiles through Joseph Smith and they rejected the fulness and corrupted the church. Now "they have become like unto the wild olive tree," partly because they have joined themselves to an organization that displays a wild olive tree in its logo. Can it be any more blatant? But if this doesn't convince you of the evilness of the United Nations, there is plenty more. Below is a picture of the UN's Meditation Room, also located at its headquarters.

This room was revamped in the 1950s under the direction of Dag Hammarskjold, one of the Marxist Secretary-Generals of the UN. It was changed from a prayer room to a mediation room at the behest of the World Council of Churches, under the auspices of religious tolerance. However, when you study the symbolism found in the room there is only one religion that fits: Luciferianism. 

First off, the shape of the room is trapezoidal. A trapezoid is an unfinished shape, kind of like a diminished cord in musical theory. More specifically it is an unfinished pyramid, and as such is symbolic of never reaching heaven or God. It has been used in occult and black magic rituals for centuries. Anton LeVay, the founder of the Church of Satan, based his church off of the "Order of the Trapezoid," established in the 1950s. In fact, there is an entire magical science based on geometric shapes, which is very much on display there in the Meditation Room, especially in the mural. By the way, Pope John Paul II requested to be buried in a trapezoidal coffin prior to his death. Check it out:

Interesting right? What god did this Pope worship? Definitely not Jesus. In fact, Dag Hammarskjold explained in the visitation center leaflet that there is a god that the stone altar is dedicated to:

But the stone in the middle of the room has more to tell us. We may see it as an altar, empty not because there is no God, not because it is an altar to an unknown god, but because it is dedicated to the God whom man worships under many names and in many forms. (The Cult of the All-Seeing Eye, by Robert Keith Spenser)

The god Mr. Hammarskjold is referring to cannot be Jesus Christ, who only has one name and one form.  I'll let you, dear reader, decide what god the UN pays homage to after you finish reading this post. 

When a person walks into the Meditation Room they will experience an "abrupt withdrawal from the outside world," and a "peculiar spatial disorientation." The stone altar is 4 ft. high and made of million-year-old crystalline iron ore. It was donated by the Swedish government and weights 6.5 tons, resting "on a concrete pillar that goes straight down to bedrock." This rock is known as a lodestone, or magnetite, and possesses strong polarity and magnetism. Hammarskjold also referred to the altar as the "cornerstone." This is a reference to the chief corner stone the builders rejected, a Masonic term for the light of Christ. But when you actually get into the lore it is not the light of Christ at all, but the light of Lucifer they are referring to. The cornerstone the builder's rejected is really just another name for illuminism, and this is where the term Illuminati came from. I have expounded on this in-depth in Mystery Babylon II: Superstition. Again, if you're new to this stuff it can be a lot to take in.

The stone altar has other implications. It could have reference to the ancient Stone of Foundation, which the Freemasons believe was placed in the Temple of Solomon. It was a "perfect cube, and had inscribed upon its upper face, within a delta or triangle, the sacred Tetagrammaton, or ineffable name of God." Tetra means four, and grammaton means letters, and the four letters representing the Hebrew name for God are YHWH, short for Yahweh or Jehovah. But make no mistake, the black stone cube does not represent Christ, it represents Lucifer. Remember Satan is jealous of Christ's glory and wants all the honor and adoration for himself, so he twists everything around to show that he is the good guy and Christ is the villain. 

Two attributes about the stone verify the fact that it's a tribute to Satan: the color black and its cubed nature. Black has long been associated with witchcraft, "black" magic, sorcery, and devil worship. It is also associated with the planet Saturn, which is where we get our word Saturday from. Saturn was the Roman name for Osiris, whom the Greeks called Kronos. He was the god of rigidity, conformity and punishment. The Romans celebrated the festival of Saturnalia in late December with feasts and gift giving, in the hopes of receiving an abundant agricultural yield. Judges wear black robes today in observance of Saturn, symbolizing their punitive authority. The cube was also symbolic of Saturn, and this is why college graduates wear the square hat and tassel, it represents the cube and the fact that they are now an alumni, or illuminated. Of course they are not really illuminated, they have been educated in a system that was meant to deceive them because they are among the profane, and can only understand the exoteric meaning of the square hat, which most people merely associate with graduation without ever thinking twice about it. 

The stone and the cube have also long been associated with pagan worship, and "the 'stone,' the metal altar, in its stark setting in that Room is in itself a symbol of idolatry." Stone worship dates back to ancient civilizations, many of whom worshipped the sun. The Druids built Stone Hedge in a circle representing the sun, and the Egyptians tracked the sun god Horus’ 12 steps across the sky as hours. The cubed stone was symbolic of the strength of the pagan gods who were worshipped. According to Spenser:

To use the language of Dudley, the pillar or stone was adapted as a symbol of strength and firmness--a symbol, also, of divine power, and, by a read inference, a symbol or idol of the Deity himself... the god Hermes [Mercury] was represented without hands or feet, being a cubical stone, because the cubical figure betokened his solidity and stability. (The Cult of the All-Seeing Eye, p. 14., all quotations in the last few paragraphs have been from this book and I highly recommend reading it, click here for a PDF)

The god Hermes is where we get the symbol of the Caduceus, or the medical staff. His was also known as Mercury, which comes from the Latin word merx, which means merchants. For it is merchants who control the medical and pharmaceutical industries (see this post to find out where the word pharma comes from). The medical staff is a rod with a small circle at the top and two snakes wrapped around it. The snakes represent polarity, the ying and the yang, and sexual copulation. The rod represents the priests of Pharaoh who had "black" magical powers, and the circle at the top represents the sun. Here is the logo of the World Health Organization:

I am not sure why they only have one snake on this logo, but it's clear that it represents Hermes, the god who is symbolized by the stone cube. They obviously want to use medicine to control the masses of the world, as we have seen them aggressively attempt in the last few years with Covid-19. 

Now let's have a closer look at the mural:

This fresco was painted by Bo Beskow, "an old friend of Dag Hammarskjold." It took him a month to finish it. It was designed to give the room depth and to provoke meditation. He claimed that it "contained no intentional symbols," and was simply a place for the eye to wander. This, as we shall see, was a lie. The painting is full of geometry and mathematics, with calculated and precise meaning.  Here is what a mystic said about "real art":
The mystic, P.D. Ouspensky, has written that in "real art nothing is accidental. It is mathematics. Everything in it can be calculated, everything can be known beforehand. The artist knows and understands what he wants to convey and his work cannot produce one impression on one man and another impression on another, presuming, of course, [they are] people on one level... At the same time the same work of art will produce different impressions on people of different levels. And people from lower levels will never receive from it what people of higher levels receive. This is real, objective art... An objective work of art... affects the emotional and not only the intellectual side of man."(As quoted by Spenser, p. 9)

The mural was painted with a purposeful duality: the exoteric meaning meant for the profane, and the esoteric meaning meant for the initiated.  For the profane, it is meant to induce a feeling of confusion and bewilderment, because the confused are more likely to submit to and obey authority. For the initiated, it is a reminder of the god they worship. Consider this quote from an expert on cubed art:

Cubist art is an effort to produce certain psychic effects obtainable by optical illusion. Beauty has nothing to do with it. The cubist school is not the realm of art at all. it belongs to that of medicine and psychic science. (Spenser, p. 17)

The mural is a form of mind control to the uninitiated. Let's dive into the symbolism, I recommend looking at the picture of the mural with each bullet point:

  •  The entire mural is asymmetrically arranged into a "Magic Square." This square contains 9 cells arranged like a game of tick-tack-toe. The numbers that fill the cells equal the sum of 15 whether they are added vertically, horizontally, or diagonally. The number 15 is another form of the name of God in Hebrew, JAH. But again, this is not Christ they are alluding to here, it is Lucifer.
  • The dark blue rectangle in the center of the mural represents the altar. The tilted yellow rectangle also represents the altar. Both altars represent duality, the yellow (the sun), and the blue (the earth).
  • The white half-crescent in the upper right quadrant represents one side of the sun. If it is continued full circle it wraps around the half-grey, half black all-seeing eye in the middle. Together this signifies the phallus, or the generative force. The crescent is also a symbol of the moon, the female principle, and fertility. The all-seeing eye represents Lucifer. 
  • From Spenser: "There are 72 geometrical figures (and shadings) in the mural... The number 72 denoted from the earliest days the Divine Name of 72 words. This number is derived from a permutation of the values assigned to the four letters of the Tetragrammaton (JHVH: Jehovah)... Seventy-two is also the number of the Quinaries or sets of five degrees in the 360 degrees of the Zodiac." Again, their god is NOT Jehovah. (p. 18)
  • There are 22 of each of the following triangles in the mural: isosceles, equilateral, scalene, and right-angled. There are 22 letters in the ancient Hebrew alphabet. Triangles symbolize Deity, as well as both the male and female element depending on whether it is pointing up or down. A black and inverted triangle represents Lucifer. 
  • From Spenser: "The spiral figure intertwined with the mural-length diagonal line symbolizes the Caduceus of Hermes (Mercury), which mythologically is represented as two serpents twined around the winged band of Mercury. Nine arcs are formed by the intersections of the spiral line with the diagonal; the ninth Hebrew letter, Teth, with the value of nine, has the signification of 'serpent.' The number of the beast is 666, which cabalistically is nine, the number of generation. The twin serpents of the caduceus are negative and positive (representing polarity) and twine around the spinal column... The caduceus is also the symbol of peace, the propaganda term associated with the U.N." (p. 18)
The Meditation Room is positioned in such a way that when a person walks into it they are coming from the north and heading northeast. This signifies walking from darkness into light. The sun rises in the east and is the source of all light. Thus, this symbolizes the advancement of an initiate from ignorance to knowledge. Nothing about the Meditation Room has anything to do with Jesus Christ. It is steeped in the occult, the esoteric, and the Satanic. Every member of the LDS Church, a church who feigns the worship of Christ, should ask themselves what in the world the Brethren and Sistren of the Church are doing supporting this evil organization.

Finally, the UN has its own publishing company that prints and disseminates propaganda materials; it's called The Lucis Trust. Lucis is Latin for light. It has an interesting history to say the least. It was established in 1922 as The Lucifer Trust company by Alice Bailey and Helena Blavatsky. You read that right, The Lucifer Trust, and they published their books under the Lucifer Publishing Company. Realizing they were over-zealous, they changed the name to Lucis Trust in 1925 to make their existence more palatable to the public. Blavatsky had founded the Theosophical Society in 1875, an occult think-tank dedicated to the tenets of Luciferianism. She authored several books on the occult, including an entire series in the Lucifer Collection, the most blatant title being The Secret Doctrine of Lucifer. Alice Bailey was no less prolific in occult writings. One of her most well-known books is Education for a New Age, in which she raves about how man is merely an animal that needs to be controlled, and that world citizenship in a world government is the highest goal we can strive for. The Lucis Trust is still publishing materials for the UN today, here is a link to their website. If you visit the site you see that the logo is an occult triangle that is steeped in New Age symbolism. You will also see a major theme called "World Goodwill," this is associated with the UN and is code for New World Order. 

To get an idea of who these people are we need to take a look at the Theosophical Society. The major tenets of this group parrot the mystery school philosophies that I wrote about here. Some of the main teachings are as follows:
  • Denouncement of the divine authority and mission of Christ and the claim that man needs no Savior.
  • Claiming that man can progress to become a god through knowledge and intellect instead of through being "saved."
  • Claiming that man's soul goes through multiple reincarnations in his journey of ascension.
  • Claiming that human evolution is the process and path to enlightenment. 
  • Asserting that the highest goal of reincarnation is reaching the spiritual status of a Theosophist, or "the fullness of God." 
  • Claiming that all the great world teachers, including Christ, have reached this status and are there to help us ascend. 
The Lucis Trust is an anti-Christian organization, any teaching that diminishes the divinity of Christ is Satanic. These are the types of organizations the LDS Church is now supporting. This should be a sobering thought and give all Latter-Day Saints great pause. The Lucis Trust was established in New York City, and at one time its office held the address of 666 United Nations Plaza. It is also a member of the Economic and Social Council of the UN, the brainchild of the UN's program for "sustainable development." If all this is not enough proof for you of the occult nature of the UN, consider this quote from Alice Bailey in a 1955 magazine published by Lucis Trust:
Evidence of the growth of human intellect along the needed receptive lines [for the preparation of the New Age] can be seen in the "planning" of various nations and in the efforts of the United Nations to formulate a world plan... From the very start of this unfoldment, three occult factors have governed the development of all these plans. (Alice B. Bailey, Discipleship in the New Age (Lucis Press, 1955), Vol. II, p. 35)

She never spells out exactly what the "three occult factors" are, but she really doesn't need to. There is plenty of other evidence pointing to the Satanic origins and influence of the UN. The main thing to realize is that the UN has been planned by the mystery schools for a long time. World government has been the goal of Satan ever since he made his first oath with Cain. Even as far back as the Knight's Templar, plans were being made to establish international banking institutions and global organizations. Remember, there is nothing new under the sun, Satan is doing "that which has been done in other worlds," and he knows his craft well. Don't be deceived by these organizations that speak flattering words to us. Remember the words of Moroni:

Wherefore, take heed, my beloved brethren, that ye do not judge that which is evil to be of God, or that which is good and of God to be of the devil. For behold, my brethren, it is given unto to judge, that ye may know good from evil; and the way to judge is as plain, that ye may know with a perfect knowledge, as the daylight is from the dark night. (Moroni 7:14-15)

For some extra study, here is a video from Bill Cooper's the Hour of the Time radio show where he repeats much of this information and adds his own commentary:

The Bill of Rights has been Replaced

In the video below, G. Edward Griffin is speaking to a group of patriots about the dangers of the United Nations in 1972. If you start at the 30-minute mark, you will hear him talk about a document called the United Nations Draft of the International Covenant on Human Rights. You can read it here. This was presented to the United States as a treaty in the 1960s. And if you are familiar with international law you know that when a treaty is ratified by a 2/3 vote in the Senate it becomes the supreme law of the land. Griffin asserts that the supreme court decided this policy a long time ago. He said that if ever ratified, this treaty would replace the Bill of Rights. Well, the Senate finally passed the treaty in 1992, and Bush Sr. ratified it. You can read about that here. And here is the video:

The language of the document is pleasant and carnally appealing. It outlines all of our rights and privileges, even including clean water, healthy food, healthcare, education, etc. But the problem is that the UN conception of rights is based upon the false idea that rights are granted by the State. The American Bill of Rights was based upon the premise that our rights come from the Creator, and are inalienable, which literally means unsellable. Our rights have now been sold, and have become alienable, to be determined by a bunch of foreigners. And certain items claimed as rights in the document cannot logically be rights at all... like water, food, healthcare, education, etc. These things can only be rights to one group at the expense of another. Thus, they create financial duties involving the confiscation of property from the productive class. Another name for that is legal plunder. And remember what my favorite Libertarian philosopher said? Government is nothing but "a secret band of robbers and murderers." The only difference on the global stage is that their ability to murder and plunder is multiplied exponentially.

Each human right that is outlined in the International Covenant on Human Rights comes with a caveat, stipulation, or condition. I'll give you an example. Article 18 reads as follows:
Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right shall include freedom to have or adopt a religion or belief of his choice, and freedom, either individually or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching... Freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health, or morals or the fundamental rights and freedom of others. (p. 10, Emphasis added)

Notice the wording: freedom to practice your religions may be subject to limitations as prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health, or morals. Every right is followed by a similar sentence. This means that if the United Nations ever becomes the world-one government, they can simply say that Christianity is unsafe for public consumption and pass a law against it. This document does not guarantee a single right. And furthermore, if a religious belief gets in the way of their conception of public safety and health, like say a religious vaccination exemption, they can simply deny it. 

There was another document written by the UN which they call the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This is the one that everyone refers to when they talk about how great the UN is. It repeats all the rights and privileges that are printed in the International Covenant on Human Rights, but leaves out the caveats and stipulations. This one is for the lay people, the other one is for politicians and is the one now binding on us because of its ratification in 1992. However, if you read all the way to the end of the Universal Declaration, you find that it is also conditional. Here is what Article 29 says:

Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible. In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedom of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society. These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations. (P. 108, Emphases added)

The two sentences that I bolded and italicized above make every single right conditional and null and void if the Security Council decides so. These are the crafty words of an organization that is attempting to establish a one-world socialistic totalitarian dictatorship. If you listen to Mr. Griffin's 1972 speech that I posted in the YouTube video above, you will hear parts of the Soviet Union's constitution, which eerily contains much of the same language of the International Covenant on Human Rights. Every right and privilege is followed by the stipulation that such can be restricted or limited as prescribed by law. This wording allows a loophole for the government to do whatever they want. And furthermore, in either of the UN documents I've cited here, there are no articles guaranteeing property rights or the right to bear arms or to replace the government if it becomes tyrannical. 

Now, let's jump ahead to Agenda 2030, the plan for "sustainable development" that Elder Christofferson finds so noble and worthy of emulation. Here is the PDF of it if you're hard up for some dry reading. I'll just summarize the 17 bullet points:

  • End poverty. 
  • End hunger. 
  • Ensure health for all. 
  • Ensure inclusive and equitable education.
  • Achieve gender equality.
  • Ensure clean water and sanitation for all.
  • Ensure access to affordable and sustainable energy.
  • Promote sustained and inclusive economic growth.
  • Build resilient infrastructure and sustainable industrialization.
  • Reduce inequality among countries. 
  • Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, and sustainable.
  • Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns.
  • Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts.
  • Conserve and sustainably use the oceans.
  • Conserve the environment and ecosystems.
  • Promote peace and inclusive societies and institutions.
  • Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the Global Partnership for Sustainable Development.
Agenda 2030 is the same program as Agenda 21 that was being pushed back in the 1990s. The difference is that Agenda 21 was a general goal for the 21st Century, while Agenda 2030 is a goal for a specific year, this is what makes it scary. That means we only have 8 years to stop it, and trust me, there are a lot of good folks trying to do just that. Instead of trying to explain exactly what the world under Agenda 2030 would look like, I'm going to suggest the video below. This woman is an activist who is working hard to expose what the UN is actually up to with this agenda:

Basically they want to confiscate all the rural land of the entire earth and force everyone into big cities where they can be monitored under constant surveillance. There would be no property rights, no privacy, no private transportation, no health freedom, no economic freedom, and eventually no religious freedom. It would be a dystopian hell on earth; Orwell's 1984 on stilts. There would be no representative government, no local government, and no elective process. Big Brother would operate in a far away land without a name and without a face, yet all would be forced to bow to him and "worship the beast," while those who refused would lose their heads

Furthermore, the lofty goals of Agenda 2030 could never be accomplished by fiat. You cannot legislate poverty, hunger, and inequality out of existence. The Soviets tried to do it and ended up murdering around 40 million of their own citizens, the Chinese murdered 70 million. Just consider that every time the U.S. government has declared a war on an idea or a thing like drugs, poverty, terror, etc., it has only made things worse. Society has to be changed from the inside, through the actions and endeavors of individuals exercising their free agency. Zion can only be brought about through voluntary means, and only through the doctrine of Christ. It is only through Christ that Zion will be possible at all. Governments, leaders, global institutions, and religions will have nothing to do with it. In fact, the scriptures tell us that they will be actively fighting against it. 

No, D. Todd, Zion will not be a "Sustainable Society"

There will be nothing "sustainable" about the coming Zion in any worldly sense. It will be devoid of governing bodies, world leaders, religious organizations, or other strong men or institutions. It will lack centralization and authoritarianism. There will only be one ruler, the King of Heaven, Jesus Christ, who will reign with equity and justice. Although Elder Christofferson makes lip service to the Savior and the doctrine of Christ in the talk, it is clear that he is advocating Agenda 2030 as the standard that Zion societies should be based upon. He begins the first paragraph with what he thinks that standard is:
... no poverty, zero hunger, quality education, gender equality, clean water and sanitation, and decent work. (Sustainable Societies)

In the next paragraph he asserts that "we have scriptural record of at least two such thriving societies." Can you see what he did here? He introduces the standard, Agenda 2030, and then introduces the two Zion societies as if they were patterned after it. This is brilliant and subtle propaganda to get the members of the Church to equate Zion with Agenda 2030. But the Lord's Zion and the United Nations are diametrically opposed, as David O. McKay stated all those years ago. You cannot serve two masters, Elder Christofferson; a Babylonian idea, program, concept, or law can NEVER bring about Zion. Communism is NOT the same thing as "having all things in common." The very simple and plain difference between Communism and the United Order is free agency. One allows it and one does not. Agenda 2030 is clearly Communism.

Throughout his talk Christofferson makes lip service to good principles that are hard to disagree with such as: personal accountability, not trusting in the arm of flesh, integrity, compassion, marriage and fidelity, respect for others and their property, and the necessity and dignity of work. There is nothing wrong with any of these noble concepts, but he omits one very important, and I might add the most important one of all: Free Agency. Never once throughout the entire talk does he suggest that the lofty goals of Agenda 2030 and Zion can be accomplished using our free agency. The talk is completely and strangely silent on personal liberty and freedom. In fact, in one part of the talk he actually advocates against personal liberty:

A society, for example, in which individual consent is the only restraint on sexual activity is a society in decay. (Emphasis added)

Now I won't argue that sexual promiscuity doesn't cause heartache and misery in a society. But what does he mean by individual consent being the only restraint?  What is he suggesting? That there be other restraints imposed by those who govern society? He doesn't clarify what those restraints might be, but if something is no longer left up to individual consent, then we're talking about legislation against personal choice. Sexual sin is condemned throughout scripture but there are never secular laws against it except in the case of adultery, which is actually a breach of covenant and contract. Fornication is never punished by law in the Book of Mormon, it only carries spiritual consequences, and of course the risk of disease and unplanned pregnancy. If Elder Christofferson is willing to allow the State to intervene in personal choices involving sexual activity, then what other socialistic programs is he willing to endorse? Obviously, he endorses all those outlined in Agenda 2030.

In another part of the talk Christofferson makes a glaring statement of hypocrisy. This one has to do with trusting in the arm of flesh:

I think it safe to say that when people turn from a sense of accountability to God and begin to trust in the "arm of flesh," disaster lurks. Trusting in the arm of flesh is to ignore the divine Author of human rights and human dignity and to give the highest priority to riches, power, and the praise of the world (while often mocking and persecuting those who follow a different standard). 

I totally agree with this statement, but this is a case of the pot calling the kettle black. First of all, comparing Agenda 2030 with Zion is trusting in the arm of flesh. It's mingling the philosophies of men with scripture and then saying the former created the scripture. Second, to ignore the divine Author of human rights is to promote an agenda that says that rights are granted by the State, and not God. And lastly, it's obvious from the news coming out as of late about the Church's hedge fund that it does not use to help the poor, its financial and rhetorical support of the UN, and its incessance on the follow the prophet doctrine, that it does "give the highest priority to riches, power, and the praise of the world."

And what about mocking and persecution? Every time the Church has someone excommunicated for "apostasy" they are engaging in this very thing. Most of the time it is because the person no longer sustains the Brethren and is speaking out to others about the things he or she sees happening in the church today that are antithetical to the gospel.

So how does the Lord actually describe His Zion? All one need do is read the entire chapter of 4th Nephi to see that Christofferson's talk is all smoke and mirrors. It is not the real thing. Zion is not and will never be a "sustainable society" because it is based upon individual freedom and God's law. Consider these words from the Book of Mormon, and decide for yourself whether Elder Christofferson's description of Zion is accurate or not:

And they had all things common among them; therefore there were not rich and poor, bond and free, but they were all made free, and partakers of the heavenly gift...

And it came to pass that there was no contention in the land, because of the love of God which did dwell in the hearts of all the people. 

And there were no envyings, nor strifes, nor tumults, nor whoredoms, nor lyings, nor murders, nor any manner of lasciviousness; and surely there could not be a happier people among all the people who had been created by the hand of God.

There were no robbers, nor murderers, neither were there Lamanites, nor any manner of -ites; but they were in one, the children of Christ, and heirs to the kingdom of God. (4 Nephi 3, 15-17, Emphasis added) 

As you read in verse 3, they were all made free, a major point that Christofferson omitted from the talk. They accomplished all the ideals of a Zion society, i.e., no contention, no strife, no lying, no whoredoms, no rich, no poor, and no lasciviousness -all without government edict. They did it all without compulsory means. Without a global institution vying for global power. There were no robbers and murderers, which means no government at all. All were the Children of Christ, meaning they had all entered into covenant individually with him and had been spiritually begotten, another thing Christofferson makes no mention of in his talk.

Before I end this post I have to point out the elephant in the room. The scriptural smoking gun against the United Nations that is painfully obvious to those with eyes to see. It's almost as if Moroni was calling out the United Nations itself when he uttered this prophecy:

For it cometh to pass that whoso buildeth it [this secret combination] up seeketh to overthrow the freedom of all lands, nations, and countries; and it bringeth to pass the destruction of all people, for it is built up by the devil, who is the father of all lies, even that same liar who beguiled our first parents, yea, even that same liar who hath caused man to commit murder from the beginning; who hath hardened the hearts of men that they have murdered the prophets, and stoned them, and cast them out from the beginning. (Ether 8:25, Emphasis added)

What other organization on earth besides the UN could overthrow the freedom of all lands, nations and countries? Think of Agenda 2030; they want to confiscate all rural lands and force all people into small living quarters in big cities. What other organization is made up of nations and countries that convene and hold councils and votes that influence other nations and countries? Yes it is true that the real conspirators are the secret societies that make up Mystery Babylon and their front organizations like the Freemasons, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderbergers, the Committee of 300, the Knights of Malta, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the International Monetary Fund, and the Federal Reserve Bank. But the end-game of all the Deep State Globalists is one-world government, and what better front institution to achieve their dream through than the United Nations? 

What else did Moroni say? It is built up by the devil. If you study nothing else but the symbolism in the logo and Meditation Room at the UN headquarters, you will find Luciferianism behind every statue, every stone altar, and every painting. Satan has been working toward this goal for millennia. "Now is the great day" of his power. He wants to enslave you and he knows he has little time left to do it. And he has conscripted the churches of the world to help him, and the LDS Church, the one we used to count on to lambast communism and world government, has put its corporate shoulder to the wheel in building up the most powerful secret combination of all time. 


Update 11-20-22:

Rebekah Griffin has produced two excellent videos on the role the LDS Church is playing in building up the United Nations.

Here is part I, which has been removed from YouTube:

And here is part II, just released on YouTube:



  1. I remember being disappointed years ago when I read about how Heber J Grant was preaching in favor of the League of Nations. This timeline mentions it (21 September 1919):

    1. Oh wow, that is one I wasn't aware of. I knew Grant was a Statist, he totally favored Prohibition. Thanks for pointing that out.

  2. "A society, for example, in which individual consent is the only restraint on sexual activity is a society in decay."

    I think you missed the point on the danger being described here. There is an agenda to promote "anything goes" in terms of sexuality, as long as there is "consent" between those involved. This is why there is such a push to groom children sexually, so that they believe they are consenting to their abuse. I believe that even adults are groomed toward more and more extreme forms of perversion and abuse of themselves and others which has nothing to do with the procreative power with the only restraint being "consent". There is also a simultaneous push for more and more extreme allowance of "abortion", even after birth. This is a society in decay. As of right now, there are still moral and religious restraints on sexual activity that are pushing back against this Satanic agenda, but you may be able to see how close to the edge we are when children are being mutilated and sterilized because of their consent to change genders.


This is the Place X: The Tabernacle Organ and the Freemasonic "Architects"

  Previously: A Tabernacle and an Assembly Hall Welcome readers to part ten of my series on Old World Utah.  Have you ever wondered how Utah...