The Beast is Coming to Utah VIII: The Corporation has no Clothes

 Previously: Bracing for Impact

Welcome readers to the last segment of The Beast is Coming to Utah series. If you've stuck it out with me for the previous seven parts then you'll have a pretty good idea just how connected the LDS Church is to globalism and the New World Order. 

There has been a lot of hub-bub about a recent whistleblower who revealed that the LDS Church has a $100 billion hedge fund that it does not use for charitable donations. This has led some to believe that it has become the "richest Church in the world." 

I too was under that delusion until I went down the Jesuit rabbit hole and discovered that the Rothschilds have been the personal bankers for the Vatican and the Pope for hundreds of years. They are playing with all the world's money ($100 billion is chump change to them). That means that the same people who own the majority of shares in Blackrock and Vanguard are working with the Vatican. The same people who run the Federal Reserve, the IMF, the World Bank, and Wall Street are working with the Jesuits and the Black Pope. 

When referring to the Church of the Devil, both Nephi and John used one common word: mother. John used the phrase Mother of Harlots and Nephi described her as the mother of abominations. 

We are all familiar with the concept of the "mother ship," and the "mother country." This signifies a headquarters, a stronghold, a base of operations, or a high command. The spiritual headquarters of Lucifer's Church is Isis, the mystery initiates who make up the body of believers. The physical headquarters, or the corporate vehicle from which they act, is the Vatican. This is the entity that the kings of the earth have committed fornication with. 

They have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, or in other words, have partnered with the mother. They have become one of her satellites. Their mind has become her mind, reduced to worker ants under the orders of the Queen. 

One of these kings is the President of the Corporation Sole of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. He is both a king and a subordinate. A king because when he assumes the presidency he has control of all the wealth and resources of the corporation. A subordinate because of the etymology of the word sole. It means "bottom, ground, foundation, lowest point of a thing."

His kingship is appointed to him by his superiors, those who run the Vatican from behind the scenes. He is fed their scraps from the global table, and in exchange must do their bidding. In the current LDS administration, that has manifested in endorsing Covid protocols, donating tithing funds to GAVI, participating in G20 conferences and climate repentance ceremonies, supporting the implementation of UN Agenda 2030 in Utah by donating to and being part of NGOs like Envision Utah, and renovating Temple Square to look like a mini-Vatican. 

How did we get here? How did an organization that began almost 200 years ago as a partial restoration of God's ancient religion morph into a satellite of the very Beast that John prophesied of? 

The Book of Mormon holds some keys to understanding this conundrum. 

King Noah is a typology of Brigham Young. He was a theocratic ruler with an abundance of plural wives who fared sumptuously off the taxes/tithes of his people. He enjoyed a secluded mini-empire where he answered to no one. 

As far as we know, king Noah was not a part of any secret combinations, and if he was, they were small, organic institutions involving himself and his priests. No Mystery School initiates like Giddianhi were pulling the strings in Noah's kingdom. He was a wild card. 

It also appears as if Brigham's kingdom was isolated from Gaddiantons. While it is true that Brigham, Heber, and other Church leaders were part of clandestine groups like the Secret Chamber, these were internal societies established by Young and Kimball who were parroting what they learned in Freemasonry. 

Is there any proof that the 19th century Utah Mormons were being controlled exogenously from elite families like the Rothschilds? 

I haven't been able to find any, and trust me I've looked. There is nothing out there but theories. (There is one interesting theory that Brigham Young met with a Jesuit priest, Father Pierre-Jean DeSmet, in Council Bluffs, Ohio, and was instructed to move the Mormons to Utah where the Salt Lake, Manti, Logan, and St. George temples already existed, built by ancient cultures, maybe even the Nephites. However, I have not found any corroborative sources to substantiate this.)

When Brigham wrote to the heads of Freemasonry in England and specifically asked if the Utah Mormons could be granted a public charter to become their own Masonic rite, he was flat out denied. 

Fritz Springmeier, author of Bloodlines of the Illuminati, claims that the Rothschilds financed the Utah Mormons along with the Jehovah's Witnesses in the 19th century. The only source he offers for this is page 66 of a book entitled Rocky Mountain Empire of the Latter-Day Saints by Samuel W. Taylor, published in 1978. 

Taylor reveals that in 1896, George Q. Cannon presented a plan to issue bonds that would allow Easterners to invest in the Mormon Church. President Woodruff was very enthusiastic about the plan, and sent George and his son Frank on a trip to meet with the heads of the Union Pacific Railroad and other financial giants like E. H. Harriman and George J. Gould, as well as bankers from Kuhn, Loeb, & Co (a Rothschild bank). 

The meeting seemed promising, however, before any loan could be secured, Woodruff died and Lorenzo Snow withdrew the bond issue. It seems ironic that Springmeier would cite this as "proof" that the Mormon empire was financed by the Rothschilds. Furthermore, some have speculated that Woodruff was a member of the Bohemian Grove in California, but the only documentation we have is of him attending a luncheon at the Bohemian Club in San Francisco (see this video for more details on that). 

However, the Skull and Bones chapter at the University of Utah was established in 1910 by an unnamed Yale alumni. If you become a supporting member at Defending Utah, you can see rosters (albeit incomplete) of students who were initiated into the Order. Besides the Romneys, Kimballs, and Cannons, other familiar names we see associated with Mormonism are George Albert Smith, Jr., initiated in 1926, Marvin J. Ashton in 1936, Russel M. Nelson in 1946, and Hugh W. Pinnock in 1957. 

It is my current belief that the Mormon empire was built up organically, just like king Noah's empire was, and was later infiltrated by secret societies. Don't get me wrong, I definitely believe the early leaders wanted to part of these societies, which is why they went to the Bohemian Club and to the Rothschilds in the first place. (Even John Taylor met with Baron Rothschild and spoke about it in the April 1876 general conference). When infiltration eventually came, I believe it was based on a foundation laid by early Church leaders. (But as always I could be wrong on this point). 

That being said, I believe that, like Noah, Brigham was indeed a wild card. (However, I am still open to the idea that the Salt Lake temple existed before Brigham got there. See the theory on the Tartarian Empire). 

The Book of Mormon throws quite an interesting plot twist into the account of king Noah. This involves the infamous priests of Amulon. As you'll recall, Amulon was a priest in king Noah's court, and during the chaos that ensued after Noah was burned alive by his people, these priests escaped quietly into the wilderness. They laid low and bided their time, waiting for the perfect opportunity to come out of the woodwork. 

This presented itself in the form of Lamanite daughters bathing in a pool of water, which they forcefully took as wives. Later they would use these wives to plead with the Lamanites on their behalf, which resulted in the king appointing them as teachers over the his people. Of course, they taught them nothing about Christ or the law of Moses. And ultimately, they would end up being taskmasters over the people of Alma, delighting in the use of compulsion over their brethren. 

Think about it: a group of priests coming from an apostate and polygamous tradition quietly settling into various positions of social power and hierarchy. 

And then the Book of Mormon gives us another clue. As it turns out, these Amulonites practiced the religion of the Nehors:

... for many of the Amlicites and Amulonites were after the order of the Nehors. (Alma 13:2, RE)

And who were the Nehors? They were practitioners of priestcraft. They elevated priest above layman and glutted themselves off the labors of others. They were also anti-Christ. They substituted humanistic tenets for Christ's simple doctrine. 

Is this sounding familiar yet?  

During the post-polygamy Manifesto years of the early 20th century, Church leaders were focusing on money and business, continuing the tradition of paying themselves a salary, and removing core Christian doctrines from Restoration texts like the Lectures on Faith.

It certainly appears as if these LDS Nehors were beginning to form alliances with modern day Gaddiantons during the Progressive Era. The Book of Mormon concurs that the Nephite Nehors also gravitated toward secret combinations. The first clue of this phenomenon appears in the Book of Alma. 

As you'll recall, Alma and Amulek are taken prisoners in the city of Ammonihah after witnessing the brutal genocide of many innocent women and children in a giant bonfire. The man behind the genocide was the chief judge of Ammonihah, who, was after the order and faith of Nehor...

Did you catch that? A judge, a government official who used his position to murder the saints of God, was a man of faith. (Remember, Mystery School initiates belong to a Church and have faith in Lucifer). 

God avenged His saints by having the wicked destroy the wicked. The Nehors met their fate when the Lamanites completely annihilated the city of Ammonihah. 

But were there survivors of that Nehor desolation? 

Did they go underground and were they the first to resurrect the old plans of Cain? Did they become the Gaddiantons we read about in the book of Helaman? 

Mormon offers more clues from his commentary on Helaman's record. He describes a time when the Lord's church prospered exceedingly and many people were baptized. After a few years some of these were lifted up in pride because of their riches, and many of them began joining themselves to the secret band of Gaddianton, engaging in theft and murder. 

So now we have former believers in Christ, who were baptized and once belonged to His church, using religion as a vehicle to get gain by uniting with secret combinations. 

How do we know they were using religion to get gain? 

Another clue by Mormon offered in 3 Nephi. The Gaddiantons had completely saturated the Nephite government right before this time, but Lachoneus and Gidgiddoni had led the righteous Nephites in purging the robbers out of the land and hanging their leader Zemnarihah. 

But the roaches went underground once again, only to resurface when God inspired certain men to call the people to repentance after pride and dissensions came back into the land (Satan often uses divisiveness to implement his plans). 

The men that God called to preach were obviously outside of the power structures of society. How do we know? Everyone was angry with them, especially the chief judges, who had been lawyers and high priests. 

Wait, high priests? What is Mormon talking about? Weren't the high priests authority holders in the church of God?

Not so. There is no mortal hierarchy in God's church; that exists on the other side of the veil. Those in authority are the Powers of Heaven, or members of the Holy Order, whom God has called by His own voice. Mortals (like Alma) were and can be called into this Order, but their authority is limited to spiritual ministering and preaching. They have no "power over the flesh." 

So who were these high priests that Mormon is talking about? And what authority did they possess? 

Were they part of a different Church? One set up among the Nephites to get power over the flesh, based upon the Nehorian model of paid clergy? And doesn't it seem strange that many of the chief judges were former high priests?

Why would Mormon lump high priests into the same category as judges and lawyers? What is he trying to tell us?

Pay very close attention to this next part.

Mormon goes on to explain that the judges, lawyers, and high priests secretly took the prophets that God sent and put them to death. And when the righteous Nephites attempted to expose them the case went before the chief judge, who was Lachoneus. But as Mormon shows, the conspirators were too powerful. As you read what follows think about all that I have written in this series about what is going on in Utah right now:

Now it came to pass that those judges had many friends and kindreds, and the remainder - yea, even almost all the lawyers and high priests - did gather themselves together and unite with the kindreds of those judges who were to be tried according to the law. And they did enter into a covenant one with another, yea, even into the covenant which was given by them of old, which covenant was given and administered by the Devil to combine against all righteousness. 

Did you catch what Mormon just said? He is describing the Mystery Religion of Lucifer. He is telling you that high-ranking members of government and religion have entered into secret agreements to fight against God (i.e., "to combine against all righteousness").

But Mormon goes on. He brings the entire thing full circle, right back to kings. He is telling you what these people really want. He is telling you the plans of the modern New World Order; they are the same plans the ancient Gaddiantons had. The goal is always the same: destroy the liberty of the people and establish kings, just like the old one-world system that king Nimrod set up:

Therefore, they did combine against the people of the Lord and enter into a covenant to destroy them and to deliver those who were guilty of murder from the grasp of justice which was about to be administered according to the law. And they did set at defiance the law and the rights of their country. And they did covenant one with another to destroy the governor and to establish a king over the land, that the land should no more be at liberty, but should be subject unto kings. (3 Nephi 3:4-5, RE, emphasis added)

Now let's go back to Utah. The LDS Church, Utah politicians, and the UN are combing to do the very same thing Mormon is describing. Indeed, modern lawyers, judges, and high priests are engaging in secret covenants and secret plans to surrender our nation to globalists. At this very time they are "setting at defiance the laws and rights of our country" to set up kings over the entire earth; to establish a one-world socialistic totalitarian state. 

They are working behind the scenes to shield pedophiles like attorney David Leavitt (and a host of others) from the grasp of justice. They are working with and protecting traitors like Jon Huntsman who has sold our country out to China. And Spenser Eccles, a product of Mormon polygamy who greatly expanded the power of the Federal Reserve. The LDS Church, with their high priest Bonesman and high priest ex-judge, are using tithing money to accomplish these ends, and are working with globalists like Klaus Schwab from the World Economic Forum. 

They have all entered into the same covenant that Mormon has just revealed to us. It was in the Book of Mormon all this time. God told us what would happen beforehand (making the obvious stipulation that it would be high priests, lawyers, and judges). What more do we need to wake up to this awful situation? 

Well, in case your wondering, I do have more to tell you. A lot more. This post will be long because I need to move on to a new series and this will be my last installment on this subject. 

I promised to get into the 1981 sign that signaled to Jesuits around the world that all religions had been infiltrated by them. I will get to that in a bit, for now we need to understand just how far the Jesuits are willing to go to maintain the power and dominion of the black papacy. 

"Blown Cover as Cover"

In Tupper Saussy's book Rulers of Evil, which I quoted extensively in previous post, he reveals that the Black Pope was the mastermind behind Pope Clements XIV's famous Disestablishment of the Jesuits. 

He had his own men disbanded and thrown out of Europe and had himself "arrested" and moved to an English college a few blocks from where he was stationed in the Vatican. He was later moved to Castel Sant'Angelo, which was connected by underground tunnels to the papal apartments in the Vatican. 

Why would he do this? Because of what Saussy calls "blown cover as cover." He was a double, double agent. 

His name was Lorenzo Ricci, and he came into the position of Superior General in 1758, and remained there until 1775. He based his strategy on the works of a sixth century Chinese general named Sun-tzu, entitled The Thirteen Articles of Military Art.

Saussy surmises that Ricci was the real author of the work, because besides their not being much historical evidence for the existence of Sun-tzu, the first copy of the book was not translated into western languages until 1772. The translation was done by Joseph-Marie Amiot, a Jesuit priest subordinate to Ricci. 

The Articles are real mind binders. They lay out intricate and detailed strategies in how to coopt both friend and enemy, and without their knowledge, put them into your employ. It is pure genius. Here is just snippet so you can see what I'm talking about:

Without giving battle, without spilling a drop of [the enemy's] blood, without even drawing a sword, the clever General succeeds in capturing cities. Without setting foot in a foreign Kingdom, he finds the means to conquer them. He acts in such a way that those who are inferior to him can never guess his intentions. He has them change location, even taking them to rather difficult places where they must work and suffer. When a clever General goes into action, the enemy is already defeated. When he fights, he alone must do more than his entire army, not through the strength of his arm but through his prudence, his manner of commanding, & above all his ruses. (Rulers of Evil, p. 94)

As you read about Ricci, Amalickiah should come to mind. He alone, one man, managed to overthrow the entire Lamanite nation and through a coup with minimal bloodshed become its de facto king. God inserted that story into the Book of Mormon for a reason. We should pay close attention to it. 

Ricci's masterplan was of course to crush Protestantism and bring all heretics under the subjection of the papacy. He saw an opportunity to coopt the colonial Protestants that had been fleeing papal tyranny since the 1600s. Instead of crushing Protestantism with brutal force, he would use the tactic of subtle infiltration through dividing and conquering. 

The French and Indian War began that process. Ricci and his Jesuits were manipulating Britain and France through the control of Freemasonry. Ironically, many Freemasonic Brits were anti-Catholic, but still answered to an "unknown Superior." That superior was Ricci. The Jesuits fueled the tensions between France and Britain for imperial control of the American Midwest. This began with getting the Indians to raid and kill English traders in the upper Ohio Valley, and when the plundering came too close to the 1.5 million acres the Virginians had just opened up for settlement in Ohio, a war erupted. 

At first King George II wanted nothing to do with the war, his attituded was "let American's fight Americans." It wasn't until Freemason Benjamin Franklin convinced him that the French were a vital threat to the colonies, sighting the Quaker pacifists in Pennsylvania as being no match against "French regulars and savage Indian braves." 

The king acquiesced to Franklin's supplication, and dispatched General Braddock and a small army to take care of the French trespassers in Ohio. This, according to Saussey, was the design of Ricci, he wanted to establish a British military presence in America. 

In 1763, the French and Indian Wars ended, and a peace treaty was negotiated in Paris. The mastermind behind the Treaty of Paris was John Stuart, otherwise known as the third Earl of Bute. Stuart was a Scot who had been befriended by the Prince of Wales in 1747. He gained favor with the British royal family, and upon the death of King George II, he was pulling the strings in the British government as the young prince George William was thrust into kingship. 

Stuart was a Freemason and Jesuit, who took orders from Ricci. He was commissioned by King George III (George William) to negotiate the Paris treaty with assistance from Lord Shelbourne, also a Jesuit. Part of those negotiations culminated in the Royal Proclamation of 1763, which prohibited Americans from moving west of an imaginary line drawn on the borders of the Allegheny Mountains. A move that enraged the colonists. 

The seeds of revolution were being planted. 

Furthermore, another result of the Paris treaty was to isolate Britain from the possibility of forming European alliances, so when the revolution came, Britain was forced to go at it alone. 

Just after Stuart resigned a very unpopular man in England, he was instrumental in influencing the appointment of a new Prime Minister who would be obedient to Ricci's demands. His name was George Grenville.

Stuart continued to be Grenville's handler from behind the scenes, and it was him who worked closely with Parliament in the passing of several of the acts that stirred the colonists up to rebellion. 

Taxes and duties were raised on the colonists. The Sugar and Molasses Act created a trade deficit between colonial imports to make rum and exports to the Caribbean islands. The effect was to dramatically slow the colonial economy, making it hard for them to pay their debts to British creditors. The act hurt both colonial and British merchants. 

When they complained to Parliament, Grenville unleashed the next economic thorn in their side, the Stamp Act. It required the colonists to purchase and fix stamps to "all colonial deeds, leases, bills of sale, pamphlets, newspapers, advertisements, mortgages, wills, and contracts." It effected all classes of Americans, both rich and poor, raising the prices of virtually all products and commodities. 

This time it was personal. Even Charles Townsend (Townsend Acts) predicted that the Stamp Act would bring in little revenue. Its covert purpose was to stir up rebellion. 

Fruits of that rebellion manifested in 1770, when some boisterous colonists began to mock and jeer at British redcoats stationed in Boston, brought in of course to intimidate tax protesters. The redcoats opened fire on unarmed citizens and Samuel Adams used the incident to propagandize against the British for the next five years. 

What was Ricci's clandestine purpose in pushing revolution?

He wanted to make the colonies virtual satellites of Roman Catholicism, controlled by bishops. He tried to accomplish this by means of a managed conflict known as the "American bishop scare." 

The colonists were widely made up of Protestants who had been escaping European tyranny since the 1600s. The Anglican church established by Henry VIII had also become oppressive, and in the late 1760s when the Anglican Bishop of London proposed that the Church of England create an American Bishop, Protestants, Presbyterians, and Congregationalists were enraged. 

The threat of an American Bishop to the colonists meant religious infiltration of government, paramount to "an ecclesiastical stamp act." According to an article in the New York Gazette published in March of 1768, an American Bishop would "introduce a system of episcopal palaces, of pontifical revenues, or spiritual courts and all the pomp, grandeur, luxury, and regalia of an American Lambeth [the residence of the Archbishop of Canterbury]."

According to Saussy, "the American bishop scare did more to foment the colonists to revolt, and eventually raised more soldiery, than all the tyrannical writs and tax schemes combined." 

Ironically, despite all the anti-bishop fervor, America would get its bishops: one from Rome and one from the Anglican church. The Roman bishop was a Jesuit named John Carroll who would become the Bishop of Baltimore on August 15 of 1790. He was the "Holy See's direct representative not just in Baltimore but throughout the U.S." 

The Anglican bishop was Rev. Samuel Seabury of Connecticut, ordained in 1784, and according to Saussy, he "was both a High Churchman and a Freemason" who took orders from the Jesuits at the highest levels. Reminiscent of the modern day political left and right, Ricci was in control of seemingly opposite religious spectrums. 

Saussy's book explores the hypothesis that the America Revolution was a Jesuit operation from start to finish. He goes as far as surmising that even the Boston Tea Party was orchestrated by Jesuits, claiming it was a ruse to disrupt trade relations between American and British merchants. The East India Company, according to Saussy, was controlled by Freemasons, and was granted special monopoly privilege by the Crown of England. 

They were exempted from paying the duty required of the American tea merchants of one shilling per pound in order to release the tea for sale. American tea-drinkers were paying less for tea from the East India Company than they would otherwise, which enraged American tea merchants. And Saussy claims it was them who organized a propaganda movement against the injustices of the East India Company, which eventually morphed into the the injustices of the Crown. 

Also interesting to consider, is the fact that the colonists who were dressed like Indians and dumping tea into Boston harbor were led by Freemasons. According to the Arthur Edward Waite's New Encyclopedia of Freemasonry, "The Boston Tea Party was entirely Masonic, carried out by members of the St. John's Lodge during an adjourned meeting." 

Tensions kept rising between Parliament and the colonies, and to add insult to injury, the Quebec Act was passed, which place the western lands of Massachusetts, Connecticut, Virginia, and New York under "the French Catholic Jurisdiction of Quebec." 

The colonists were cornered, the culminating result manifesting in 1776, under the pen of Jefferson. 

The foregoing historical account is all according to Saussy in his book Rulers of Evil. He lumps many of the Founding Fathers in as complicit in the Jesuit conspiracy. 

Are you ready for another twist? 

According to Eric Jon Phelps, who wrote Vatican Assassins, a 1600 page behemoth book, F. Tupper Saussy was a Jesuit coadjutor, painting the Revolution as being in Jesuit control. Could Saussy, a tax-evader himself, really have been in the employ of the Jesuits? Was his book nothing but a psyop to make the Jesuits appear more powerful than they really were?

Who do you believe? How do you know what is true?

Could Founders like Washington, Adams, and Jefferson have been controlled by Jesuits and later killed by them? It is possible. For instance, Napoleon Bonaparte and the French Revolution was bankrolled by Jesuits. When the Revolution was over he was moved to the island of St. Helena and given a pension for his service to them. When they decided they were done with him he was slowly poisoned over a six week period. 

However, I don't agree with Saussy on this point. We know from the Book of Mormon that the American Revolution was a grassroots Protestant movement. Nephi sees these gentiles humbling themselves before God and being led to the land of promise. Despite all the rabbit holes we go down it is paramount to realize that God is always in control of history and the fate of nations. Those nations who keep His commandments prosper, and those who do not have no promise. 

My entire point here in this digression on the American Revolution is that it is damn near impossible to know true history. It can only be discerned by the Spirit of God, and only in pieces at that. God will eventually reveal all that has happened on this earth to us, but for now we are mostly left to grasp in the dark. 

But what we can bank on is that there will always be men who hide behind religious garb and cloak as they use their positions to murder and steal for power and gain. Men like this have become masters of deceit, feigning to be humble, harmless, decrepit, and even helpless. They will use any weakness and any emotion to trick you, as they play on your most empathetic sympathies and sentiments. 

If any of you have seen the movie The Usual Suspects that came out in the 1990s, you will know exactly what I'm talking about. 

What is relevant to today is that all churches with a hierarchical structure have been infiltrated by the Jesuit Order, and unfortunately this includes the LDS Church. 

The grand sign given in 1981 was revealed by Alberto Rivera, an ex-Jesuit priest who repented and dedicated the rest of his life to Christ. The sign involved Ronald Regan. He was the first president to take his oath of office facing the Washington Monument, the giant Egyptian obelisk in D.C. This signaled to all Jesuits that every major organized religion in the world had been infiltrated by and was under the control of the Jesuit Order. (Go to the 2 hour, 13 minute mark of this documentary to hear pastor/historian Bill Hughes talk about this sign).

In my last post, Bracing for Impact, I compared the future renovation of the Church Office Building Plaza with the layout of the Vatican. I pointed out the giant obelisk in the center of Vatican City, but failed to see an obelisk in Salt Lake. A friend recently pointed out to me that there is indeed an obelisk in Salt Lake, it is the Church Office Building itself. 

I couldn't believe that I missed it! It was staring me right in the face, hiding in plain sight. Then I looked up the history of the COB, and found out that it was built during the decade between 1962 and 1972, and dedicated in 1975, just six short years before the grand sign in 1981. 

Is this a coincidence? 

Furthermore, according to Wikipedia, the COB facades feature "a closely spaced vertical pinstripe pattern of cast quartzite flanking the narrow windows," which patterns are reminiscent of those found on the former World Trade Center in New York. Does this signify a 1970s Rockefeller influence in Salt Lake? 

Also consider that the word facade means "deceptive outward appearance." Is the outer design of the building symbolic of what goes on in the interior? 

I think it is obvious at this point to conclude that some Luciferian infiltration had taken place in Mormonism in the early 20th century with the establishment of the Utah branch of the Skull and Bones. But I believe that it was during the 80s and 90s that this infiltration was complete. After the death of President Benson, there was virtually no more dissent. No wild-card Brethren spouting off against the powers that be. All seemed to walk a new homogenous line of managed agreement. If there were dissenters, they kept their mouths shut. 

The new leaders who took over when Benson was incapacitated, Monson, Hinckley, et al, were desperately trying to expunge the stigma of the conspiratorial ravings of the ardent anti-Communist. The push was to leave principles behind in exchange for public relations. They wanted to be accepted by the world. They wanted to become popular. 

During the same period of time, we have Nelson beginning his escapades with the Communist Party in China, we have Ronald Poleman being forced to re-record a talk in an empty conference center, and later on in the 90s and early 2000s we have Hinckley and Monson wining and dining with politicians and exchanging strange handshakes with them. 

The Melbourne Man right... LDS Inc. had been under the influence of the Jesuits since the Skull and Bones opened a chapter in Utah, but it wasn't until after 1981 that they had been totally infiltrated. 

Lucifer Inc.

Awhile ago a friend of mine wrote an article called World War Wicked!: God's Kingdom vs Lucifer Inc. In it he explains that Lucifer reigns on this earth through the incorporation of all governments, he writes, "all governments - federal, state, county and cities - are now all for-profit Corporations." 

The word corps comes from the Latin word corpus which means "dead body." Corp-oration is made of up two words, corp and oration, meaning "dead body talking." After the U.S. became incorporated in 1871, we all became citizens of the federal government and of our individual states. This was emphasized in the 14th Amendment, which made us employees of U.S. Inc. We all become symbolically dead, and subject to the mythological ruler of the dead, i.e., Hades. 

This dual citizenry created a conflict of interest for the United States corporation, the de facto foreign power which had declared martial law and was conducting a military occupation of America. So a silent war was declared on American citizens, a war that continues today. 

Lucifer's kingdom is ruled by the top three corporate entities: the Vatican, Down Town London, and Washington D.C. These are the great merchant city-states of the world, and we are their merchandise. The Vatican is the corporate head of the world, ruled by the chief executive, the Pope, also known as pontifex maximus, the highest of all high priests. 

I wrote two articles about maritime and corporate law: Slavery by Consent, and Beyond Conspiracy. I only bring it up here to introduce the concept that all churches that have been incorporated under the 501-3c status have become corporate arms of the Vatican, London, and Washington D.C. 501-3c is not just about allowing institutions to receive tax-exempt donations, it literally brings all churches under the subjection of Lucifer's world hierarchy. 

It was introduced by Senator Lyndon Banes Johnson in 1954 as an amendment to the U.S. tax code. Johnson was the vice-president when the Vatican murdered the liberal Catholic JFK. They killed him because he turned against the mother church by threatening to gut the CIA, pull out of Vietnam, and issue silver certificates in defiance of FRNs (Federal Reserve Notes). 

The 501-3c program was part of the ecumenical movement to bring all churches under the umbrella of the Vatican in a one-world religion. It's the final nail in the Protestant coffin, the end result of the counter-Reformation began by the Jesuits in 1541. They use the temptation of tax-free donations to lure the institutions in, and then they shut down their freedom of speech and make them virtual outposts of the federal government. During 2020, these obedient satellites shut down their services, mandated mask-wearing, and pushed needle jabbing. 

Noah Harari, the second-in-command under Klaus Schwab at the World Economic Forum, arrogantly boasted that religious leaders looked to science, not God, to solve the Covid crisis. This is the same guy who recently stated that AI should re-translate the Bible to be "correct." Check out how twisted this sycophant is:

All organized religions will fall in line with the future Beast system. Just like what happened in the Protestant Reformation 500 years ago, the last bastions of true Christianity will be found in small pockets of resistance spread out over the entire earth. These Christians will be unorganized, non-hierarchical, and above all else, humble. Nephi already told us that this would happen. He writes:

And it came to pass that I looked and beheld the whore of all the earth, and she sat upon many waters, and she had dominion over all the earth, among all nations, kindreds, tongues, and people. And it came to pass that I beheld the church of the Lamb of God, and its numbers were few because of the wickedness and abominations of the whore who sat upon many waters. Nevertheless, I beheld that the church of the Lamb, who were the saints of God, were also upon all the face of the earth; and their dominions upon the face of the earth were small because of the wickedness of the great whore whom I saw. 

And it came to pass that I beheld that the great mother of abominations did gather together in multitudes upon the face of all the earth, among all the nations of the gentiles, to fight the Lamb of God. And it came to pass that I, Nephi, beheld the power of God, that it descended upon the saints of the church of the Lamb and upon the covenant people of the Lord, who were scattered upon all the face of the earth. And they were armed with righteousness and with the power of God in great glory. (1 Nephi 3:28, RE) 

Just a few verses before Nephi had described the Protestant Reformation and the American Revolution. Notice the pattern. The gentiles humbled themselves and God led them to the land of promise, and then delivered them from their "mother gentiles," i.e., England. Nephi sees the wrath of God being poured out on those mother gentiles, and "the gentiles who had gone forth out of captivity... did prosper and obtain the land for their inheritance." 

Nephi's prophecy is multi-layered. Although to him the American Revolution and the Beast system were both future events, to us, the actual readers of the Book of Mormon, one is past and one is future. This clue from Nephi corresponds with what Jesus taught the Nephites about the prophecies of Isaiah, that he spoke about things that hath been and shall be. He is giving you the key to understanding prophecy about the last days, and that key is to study history. 

Just like the humble Protestants who escaped to the American colonies beginning in the 1600s, God will lead His future saints out of captivity and gather them together to a place called Zion. They will not go out in haste, nor by flight, but will patiently wait upon the Lord to deliver them. Some have suggested that this may actually entail ministering angels lifting them up and carrying them over the oceans to Zion, which will be located in the Rocky Mountains. Just as Nephi said, these saints will be armed with "righteousness and with the power of God in great glory." 

When the Mother of Harlots gathers to fight against the Lamb of God and the prophecies of John are fulfilled, it will be with the willful participation of all organized religions throughout the world. They will all have joined with her that sits upon many waters; the LDS Church being no exception. 

Its doctrines, creeds, and tenets have become more authoritarian, indeed, we may even say, more Catholic. The doctrine of the infallibility of the Pope has incrementally wrangled its way into Mormonism, and of all the doctrines that have gone by the wayside, that is the one that still reigns supreme. 

We know it as that quintessential creed conjured by Wilford Woodruff, harangued by Ezra Taft Benson's 14 fundamentals, and thundered from expensive pulpits where brethren implore us to fix our eyes upon other brethren… it’s that effervescent precept, that delectable dogma, that authoritarian darling of the institution, dutifully instilled into the absorbing minds of children through the blissful repetitiveness of song.

You know what I'm talking about. That magic phrase that exempts one from the arduous burden of thinking: 

Follow the Prophet... indeed, the last doctrine left.

By Their Jesuit Fruits You shall Identify Them

The Jesuit Order has been regularly training and sending out infiltrators into all modern religions for decades. One ex-defense department official turned pastor offered his estimate that the Jesuits turn out thousands of these young, collegiately trained infiltrators every single year. His name was Hiram Dukes (he was interviewed in the 1990s). Watch the documentary on Alberto Rivera below for more details:

It is impossible to pinpoint the exact moment of the Jesuit infiltration of the LDS Church (except that it was complete by 1981), but we can connect some dots and examine the fruit that the institution has produced during the last century. 

Leaving aside the 19th century Mormon Inquisition spearheaded by Brigham and others, we can see a trend of authoritarianism beginning to appear in the 20th century. The doctrine of papal infallibility was defined at the First Vatican Council in 1870, and it is eerily reminiscent of how many Mormons view Church leaders. 

For instance, the official church doctrine is that the Pope is only infallible when he is speaking ex cathedra, or when he is setting forth doctrines under the cloak of his supreme apostolic authority. This "authority" is claimed to come from Jesus Christ Himself and passed down through Peter.  

In LDS theology and culture, we have a phrase for this. We say, a "prophet is authoritative when speaking as a prophet." But we also allow him to speak "not" as a prophet when he is giving his own opinion. We also say, like the Catholics, that of course prophets/popes are mortal, can be in error, and can sin. 

The word cathedra means chair or seat, you could even call it a "chief seat." The Pope occupies a chair that Catholicism claims was once given to Peter, and when speaking in the capacity of that magic chair, the speaker becomes infallible. 

In LDS culture we call don't call it a chair, we call it a mantle, or an office. But the concept is exactly the same. Like the Pope, we claim our keys from Peter, who supposedly gave them to Joseph Smith, even though Joseph never mentioned this event in any talk or journal entry. 

Both institutions had a catalyst that created a need for an infallible authority. For Catholicism, it was the Protestant Reformation, it needed a counter reformation to combat dastardly heretics who dared to think for themselves. For Mormonism, it was their precious polygamy, when it came under attack by the federal government, President Woodruff had to come up with something to calm the fears of the brethren. He issued his famous dictum that the Lord would never permit a prophet to lead the church astray. (This classic article from Pure Mormonism on Woodruff's musings fills in the rest of that story). 

Today, this doctrine permeates the LDS Church, to the point that no matter what President Nelson does, whether it is "hastening the work" or encouraging medical jabs, it is somehow the "will of the Lord" and we must all go along (I saw many family members who were content to opt out of the vax decide to reluctantly get it after the First Presidency Statement was issued). 

This Jesuit doctrine is a most dangerous one indeed. 

The next Jesuit fruit we see creeping into the LDS Church is the removal of doctrines on the whims of leaders. One example is the apostolic committee that removed the Lectures on Faith from the Doctrine and Covenants in 1921. By what authority did they claim to do this? None, and they did it without even consulting the laity. 

And then came the correlation program. It actually began as early as 1908, but by 1944 there was a corporate Church Publications Committee that oversaw the publications of all manuals and lesson material.

Harold B. Lee was the committee leader over the entire correlation department, and he took it to unprecedented levels. Even to the point that President McKay privately voiced concern of its overreach. His counselors were worried that the priesthood power associated with correlation would threaten the decision-making authority of the First Presidency, but nothing was done by McKay to curtail the correlation department. 

Its effects have been to stifle autonomous thought in stakes, wards, and branches, and to dumb-down doctrine and hide unfavorable history. This is about as Catholic as it gets. 

Another Jesuit-like anomaly is the strange phenomenon of premature deaths resulting in short presidencies. It has been surmised by some Christian scholars that the Jesuits killed no less than fourteen American presidents. Is this something that happens in churches as well? 

Harold B. Lee is a perfect example of this. After Joseph Fielding Smith died, Lee's stint as Church president lasted less than a year and a half. Passing away at the young and tender age of 74, his death was very much unexpected. The man was relatively healthy, but some say he was so impassioned about his callings in the Church that he "worked himself to death." 

Even more curious is the fact that six hours after Lee checked into LDS Hospital on December 26th of 1973 for an annual checkup, he was pronounced dead. The official cause of death was a pulmonary hemorrhage, which means he drown in his own blood. 

There are several drugs that if given in large enough quantities can cause lung toxicity and pulmonary bleeding, including that age-old classic, warfarin, i.e., rat poison, used to thin the blood as a treatment for blood clots. Jesuits are trained in chemistry and the art of poisoning. Lee's untimely and abrupt death could have very well been an inside murder committed by a Jesuit infiltrator. 

But why would they want to get rid of Lee? After all, he had helped centralize power in the corporate headquarters by his hard work on the correlation committee. All Church publications from that point on onward would have to be scrutinized by an uninspired committee that was getting paid to tow the line of the apostolic hierarchy. 

But did Lee have regrets? Was his zeal for widespread homogeneity across worldwide LDS branches, wards, and stakes short lived? The following message from a 1972 First Presidency Message recorded in the Ensign seems to suggest that his heart was not in centralization after all:

I say we need to teach our people to find their answers in the scriptures. If only each of us would be wise enough to say we weren't able to answer any question unless we can find a doctrinal answer in the scriptures! And if we hear someone teaching something that is contrary to what is in the scriptures, each of us may know whether the things spoken are false - it is as simple as that. (Partial quote taken from Rock Waterman's article When LDS Church Leaders Teach Contrary to God, emphasis added). 

Lee was dead twelve months later. Was this a Coincidence? 

Also consider the possibility that the Jesuit infiltrators did not like the prospect of the young Lee enjoying the presidency for potentially another twenty-plus years before his death. Was his murder simply a procedural maneuver to make room for others rising through the ranks who would be more amicable to the Jesuit agenda?  

The short presidency of Howard W. Hunter seems to have fit perfectly into that scenario. Indeed, Hunter may have had the unfortunate luck of being in the wrong place at the wrong time. He served as Church President for less than nine months, the shortest presidency in the history of the Church. His untimely death just happened to make room for Hinckley and Monson to enjoy long stints of over a decade each as the corporation's head. Plenty of time to make substantial changes in Church policies and structure. 

While it is true that Hunter was much older than Lee at his passing, reaching the ripe age of 88, had he lived another decade it could have altered the timing of the pattern of seniority that has led to Nelson's presidency, which seems to have been perfectly synchronized with the advent of Covid-19.

The point is that leaders are not created out of a vacuum. When money, power, and agendas are on the line, the roaches are busy behind the scenes, scheming and planning to make sure the right people get into the right positions at the right time. 

Pope Francis is no exception. Many Christians are calling him the "New World Order pope." He and his new friend Russel Nelson have been very busy bees since their 33 minute meeting in March of 2019. His debut into power came just seven short years before the Covid crisis began.  

Popes who step out of line or begin to question things don't last long either. Consider the case of Pope John Paul I, whose stint in the papacy only lasted a mere 33 days. He supposedly died of a "heart attack" on the eve of September 28th, 1978, but an autopsy was never performed. A nun found him dead in his bed when she was bringing him his morning coffee, and noticed that his fingernails were turning black  (a sign of severe cyanide poisoning). Everyone was surprised at the official cause of death because John Paul I had no history of heart problems. 

What really happened? Eric Jon Phelps elaborates:

The Pope's death, according to some, was the result of a trusted friend who entered his room and, while standing nearby during a friendly conversation, crushed a two-chambered capsule under the Pope's nose releasing airborne cyanide. In the words of a memorandum from a U.S. Army medical facility in Washington D.C., the Papal Caesar was found sitting in a chair with a look of wide-eyed horror. (Vatican Assassins, p. 376)

Why would the Jesuits want this Pope dead? 

Because John Paul I was an honest man, and he had been conducting an investigation of the secret workings and corruption of the Vatican Bank. This bank had been set up with the $90 million that Mussolini had given the Vatican after he helped negotiate the Lateran Treaty in 1922, which made Vatican City a sovereign nation. The bank was used to help finance Hitler's rise to power. 

John Paul I also had a document that he was going to take to Father Arrupe, the Jesuit General, which had to do with the Vatican-led Liberation Theology movement in South America. The Vatican was backing Marxist uprisings and Communist Guerillas in the region, and John Paul I did not like what was going on. Remember that it was the Vatican that financed the Bolshevik Revolution and brought Lenin and Stalin to power. 

According to Phelps, two key players involved in the assassination were "Jean Cardinal Villot, the Papal Secretary of State, and Bishop Paul Marcinkus of the Vatican Bank. Both of these men were Freemasons" (VA, p. 377).

The Jesuits were still cleaning up this mess in 1982, when they murdered Roberto Calvi, the Vatican financier dubbed "God's Banker." They hung the man from the Blackfriars Bridge in London, and filled his pants with weights so it would appear as if he was attempting suicide. According to Phelps, it was Licio Gelli who ordered the hit, a member of the Knights of Malta who had connections to both Mussolini and Herman Goering's SS Division. For more details on Calvi's assassination watch the video below:

Can you see the Jesuit patterns manifesting in both the LDS and Catholic institutions? 

One common thread in the two Churches is the connection to China. Along with Nelson's work with the Communist Party that began forty years ago, the Vatican has also been working with and making secret agreements with Chinese officials. If you've read my post on Smart Cities, you'll know that the only Churches officially recognized in China have ceded control to the Communists, this includes both the Catholic and LDS Churches. 

But who has really ceded control to whom? Wouldn't it make more sense that the Vatican has been pulling strings in China for decades? After all, the Communist "republic" was created with the help of the Jesuit-influenced American government when Chiang Kai-Shek was abandoned and Mao Zedong was brought into power (see chapter 9 of W. Cleon Skousen's The Naked Communist for the complete story).

It is my belief that they are using China as the world power to destroy the United States from the inside, but planning on keeping it under their control. Ironically, as Nephi saw, this will blow up on them, because China and its future dictator, the king of Assyria (my opinion), will turn on the Great and Abominable Church. Consider this prophecy of Nephi:

And that great pit which hath been digged for them [the Gentile Saints of God] by that great and abominable church - which was founded by the Devil and his children, that he might lead the souls of men down to hell - yea, that great pit which hath been digged for the destruction of men shall be filled by those who digged it, unto their utter destruction, saith the Lamb of God... (1 Nephi 3:25, RE, emphasis added)

God's scriptural irony is truly breathtaking. 

Isn't it poetic justice that the plans of the New World Order schemers have to destroy us will be turned on them? It reminds me of one of my favorite Metallica songs they performed with the San Francisco Symphony called No Leaf Clover. The song is about the irony of hubris and overconfidence. Specifically, it is about those who think they have it made but then realize at the last minute that all they have worked for has come to naught. Consider the chorus line:

Then it comes to be that soothing light at the end of your tunnel was just a freight train coming your way. 

Have a listen to it, and as you do so think of Nephi's prophecy about the pit diggers:

Before I end this post, and this series, this is one more elephant in the room that I need to cover, and I realize that it will make this article extra-long. But it's a piece of LDS history that has been glossed over and whitewashed, yet is necessary to fill in the missing pieces of the Jesuit puzzle. 

I'm talking about the curious case of Ezra Taft Benson, a president gone rogue, an honest man who woke up to secret combinations and tried to expose them. For this I believe he was punished and silenced. 

As it turns out, some very foreboding things were taking place between the U.S. government and the Vatican during the 1980s, and Benson's warnings to Church members may have been about more than secret combinations in the government. He was also battling them in the Church. 

Abinadi Among the Jesuits

Kevin Kraut is the son of the late polygamist Ogden Kraut, and when I was first going through my faith crisis over a decade ago, I was looking into the various Mormon Fundamentalist groups. I did not like what I found, however, some of Kevin's YouTube videos were very interesting, like for instance this deathbed confession of Bruce R. McConkie. 

Eleven years ago Kevin made a video where he reveals what President Benson really thought of the corporate headquarters. Kevin had gone to a massage therapist/nature path in Utah named Stan Malstrom, and upon finding out his father was Ogden Kraut, he told Kevin that he had a story to tell him about President Benson. Have a listen for yourself:

Benson's statement that he was more afraid of the Gaddiantons in the Church headquarters than those in the federal government is telling. He had written a book called An Enemy Hath Done This, exposing secret combinations in the U.S. government, published in 1992, the same year he had made this startling confession to Stan Malstrom. In October of 1988 he had given one of the most fiery talks in General Conference ever uttered about the reality of secret combinations. He was truly attempting to awaken the general laity of the LDS Church. 

It is my belief that this cost him his life. 

Now, I have no definitive evidence that President Benson was murdered by other Church leaders, but there are bits and pieces of an underlying puzzle that forms a different picture than the narrative we have been told. One of those puzzle pieces is the testimony of Benson's grandson, Stephen Reed Benson. 

Stephen left the Church in 1993 when he became upset about the Church's PR department hiding details about his grandfather's health. He had gone to Elders Oaks and Maxwell, asking them why the Church wasn't being truthful about his grandfather. Oaks pointed to the COB and muttered the phrase, "I don't know what goes on over there in the high rise," and Maxwell replied by saying that he had enough responsibilities, and "didn't need any more." 

The Church PR department in those days was headed by Don LeFevre, and the press releases about Benson's health were flat out lies. They were saying that he was not in pain, and that he had not lost any mental capabilities. 

But Stephen and the Benson family knew better. They knew that Ezra had suffered a heart attack, a stroke, and blood clots on the brain. He was mentally incapacitated, and on the very verge of death. When Stephen approached LeFevre and confronted him about the press releases, he simply stated that "all my statements have been approved by my superiors." 

These "superiors" were Benson's counselors and Luciferian infiltrators Hinckley and Monson. They were secretly running the corporation while Benson was dying in an apartment overlooking Temple Square. They had transferred all the power of the Corporation Sole to themselves. Here is what Stephen said about it:

It is a matter of public record (thanks to the reporting of the Salt Lake Tribune) that--in direct contravention of established protocol for the transfer of power in the event that the Church president should die or become incapacitated--Hinckley and Monson had the power of attorney over LDS corporate affairs shifted to them in the Church's incorporation documents a few years before my grandfather's death (see Talmage's treatment of Church governance procedures in Articles of Faith). 

Instead of having the First Presidency dissolved and an acting president installed to administer the affairs of the Church in a situation when the sitting president was unable to perform his duties, Hinckley and Monson had legal authority to run the Mormon empire transferred directly to them by the highly unusual method of employing my grandfather's autopen signature machine on Church incorporation documents (see an account of this episode in Quinn's Extensions of Power). 

It's rotten, folks--to the core. (See Stephen's comments posted in this forum) 

I found the reference Stephen alludes to in D. Michael Quinn's The Mormon Hierarchy: Extensions of Power, and as I suspected, there was an all-out war declared on "ultra-conservative Mormons." Quinn explains as follows:

By the fall of 1992 advocates of Benson's ultra-conservativism found themselves in a religious quandary. LDS church officers were suspicious of "those obsessed with the early speeches of LDS Church President Taft Benson and who believe the ailing, 93-year leader has been silenced because his opinions no longer are politically popular." Such ultra-conservative Mormons were being excommunicated or disciplined in Utah and surrounding areas...

This 1992 "Profile of... Troublesome Ideologies" was the ultimate evidence that Benson was incapacitated and had ceased to be the administrative leader of the LDS church. 

By Gordon B. Hinckley's own admission at October 1992 conference, the counselors had taken over the helm. He denied that "the Church faces a crisis" just because he and Thomas S. Monson were serving as Benson's "backup system." (p. 114) 

This begs the question: was Benson silenced? He was virtually unable to speak the last few years of his life. What would this man have attempted to tell the Church had he been allowed to speak during that time? Just what was he trying to expose?

Benson became a liability to the Luciferians. He had delved too far into secret combinations. He had applied the Book of Mormon to the then-current state of affairs in a way that other Church leaders just could not tolerate. He had become a wild-card to the Jesuit infiltrators. 

Was his coincidental silence really caused by heart attacks and strokes, or was he surgically lobotomized? Was he deliberately silenced and locked away in a Temple Square apartment prison? 

The trouble is that the powers that be are really good at scrubbing the internet of any remnants of evidence that indict them. If Benson's death was indeed an inside job perpetrated by fellow Church leaders, the truth of it will probably not come forth until God reveals all the secret things upon the housetops. 

But God told us in scripture that the modern Gentiles who control the LDS Church would engage in such debauchery and murder. Jesus Christ Himself told the Nephites that the future Gentiles would "sin against my gospel." Well, you can't sin against something if you don't have it in the first place. 

In addition to rejecting the gospel, they would engage in the following:

lyings... deceits... mischiefs... hypocrisy... murders... priestcrafts... whoredoms... secret abominations... (3 Nephi 7:5, RE)

But there are other witnesses who testified of these things. Jeremiah (who was murdered by the Jews) also saw the modern day Gentile Church and its works of darkness, although, his application to the future Church is more subtle than the Savior's declaration to the Nephites. 

Jeremiah, in typical Old-Testament-prophet style, mixes Jewish history with modern prophecy. We know that he is talking about the latter-days because he qualifies what he's about to say with this verse:

Therefore, behold, the days come [future], says the Lord, that they shall no more say, The Lord lives who brought up the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt--but, The Lord lives who brought up and who led the seed of the house of Israel out of the north country, and from all countries to which I had driven them. And they shall dwell in their own land. 

He is talking about the yet future gathering of Israel to the latter-day Zion in the Rocky Mountains. It will be such a miraculous event that people will forget about Moses parting the Red Sea and delivering the ancient children of Israel from the Egyptians. (Here is another verse that corroborates Jeremiah's words).

Now for the clincher. 

Jeremiah then begins to mourn because of the wickedness of the "prophets". In a single paragraph, he ingeniously indicts both ancient and modern "prophets" as imposters in God's house. If you read the prophecy only through the lens of the institution, you will only see the corruption of ancient prophets. This is how God hides the truth from the prideful. 

It is only when you humble yourself, and ask why Jeremiah was asked to write this down in the first place, that you realize it has a dual meaning. Then your eyes begin to open and you see how corruption has been institutionalized in the modern Church that you thought was a bastion of spiritual security. Then you see the nakedness of the corporation. Like an emperor, whose only desire is concentrated power, you see that the "corporation has no clothes." Like Dorothy and her fellow yellow-brick-road-travelers, you finally see "the man behind the curtain." 

And he is not a prophet at all. 

Here is what Jeremiah said about the future prophets. And pay close attention to his allusions to secret combinations:

My heart within me is broken because of the prophets; all my bones shake, I am like a drunk man and like a man whom wine has overcome, because of the Lord and because of his words of holiness. For the land is full of adulterers; for because of swearing [oaths?], the land mourns, the pleasant places of the wilderness are dried up; and their course is evil and their force [power?] is not right. 

For both priest and prophet are corrupt, yea, in my house have I found their wickedness, says the Lord...  

Both priest and prophet? High priest and president? Leaders, General Authorities, self-proclaimed "prophets, seers, and revelators"? In the Lord's house? 

Are you awake? Are your eyes open?  

Jeremiah continues with the past prophets from Jerusalem:

I have also seen in the prophets of Jerusalem a horrible thing: they commit adultery, and walk in lies, they strengthen also the hands of evildoers, that none does return from his wickedness. (Jeremiah 8:18, RE, emphasis added)

What did those ancient Jewish prophets do? Strengthen the hands of evildoers. 

What do modern Gentile prophets do? Use tithing money to strengthen the hands of globalists. They swear oaths to secret societies like the Skull and Bones. They work with politicians and world leaders like Klaus Schwab. They create a web of money, power, and secrecy in Utah that weaves politicians, religious leaders, corporations, and non-governmental organizations together into a funnel of globalist agendas and goals.  

In short, they are building up the Beast and bringing it to bear upon the Utah saints. When, oh when, are the Latter-Day Saints going to wake up? 

Notice that Jeremiah also says that because of these prophets, none does return from his wickedness. This is an allusion to secret oaths and secret murders, because once someone has delved that far into secret societies, it is extremely difficult to repent and return to the Lord. (Cain is the perfect example of this). 

Let's return to President Benson briefly before I end. Let me ask a rhetorical question: How much does someone in leadership need to know before it is incumbent upon the conspirators to silence him? 

What if Benson, like Abinadi in king Noah's court, faced the prospect of death because of what he knew and what he was willing to say?  

What if he had been privy to the rituals that take place in secret underground rooms below temples? What if he had refused to participate in these pagan debaucheries? 

What if he knew that the Jesuits had infiltrated the Church? What if he knew that Ronald Reagan's taking of the oath of office facing the Washington Monument was a sign of this very thing? What if he knew that Reagan's formal and official recognition of the Vatican as a sovereign state in 1984 had ominous implications for the LDS Church? (According to Eric Jon Phelps, this was a secret treaty called a Concordat, the same agreement that Hitler's Germany and Mussolini's Italy entered into). 

What if he knew that Russel Nelson was doing more than just training Chinese doctors in surgical procedures during the 1980s? What if he was suspicious and out-right alarmed by Nelson, Oaks, and Marvin J. Ashton meeting with high profile members of the Communist Party during the same period? 

What if he knew that that some of these men were members of the Skull and Bones? 

What if Benson had repented of his past idolatry of espousing the insidious doctrine of following the prophet 14 different ways and woke up to his awful situation? 

What if he was the last truth teller to come from the hierarchy of the LDS Church, and what if the secrets that he had hoped to divulge were buried with him? 

Perhaps we will never know what happened to this good man. But what is painfully obvious is that he was right about secret combinations. He was right to warn us about Nikita Khrushchev, who said that a bloody war was not necessary to turn America into a Communist nation, but that we would one day wake up to that reality. 

It is happening before our very eyes, and the LDS Church is one of Communism's biggest advocates. But today it isn't called Communism. It's been rebranded as globalism. 

Rest in peace President Benson. In closing I dedicate the following documentary to you. Thank you for trying to warn us:

Some final thoughts...

The struggle of history has always been between the common people and the power elites. Things are no different now in 2023, the year of inversion (the inverse of the Skull and Bones secret number 322). Like those high priests that Mormon warned us about, LDS general authorities are doing nothing more than repeating ancient history. They are aligning themselves with powerful secret societies so they too can enjoy a piece of the power pie that the Beast system will offer them. 

But rest assured dear reader, God will win this war. His Wisdom is far greater than any cunning the Devil ever had. Those religious leaders who find themselves faring sumptuously with the Beast will fall into the pit with the rest of the New World Order sycophants. They will be figuratively gobbled up by the depths of the earth as they go into the rocks and caves to hide their shame from the presence of God. 

We should not fear them, nor the globalists who control them. They are mere men, most of them frail and geriatric, hiding behind body guards, paid mercenaries, and secret police. 

It is the true God of Heaven that we should fear. In just one celestial breath He can slay all the wicked of the world. In just one cosmic thought He can call upon the elements to destroy the most powerful armies on earth. If it is in His heart to protect His Saints, He can do it effortlessly, even by sending angels to lift them up and bring them to Zion. All He asks is that we obey His commandments by loving one another and having no poor among us. If we do this, He will give us back the promised land after the Gentiles are swept off.

And speaking of land, stay tuned for the upcoming series... Upon This Land... 

And here is the latest video from We Are The People Radio on Utah's partnership with the UN: