Print Friendly and PDF

Sunday, January 2, 2022

The Cult of the Germ

Previously Mystery Babylon Part IV: Philosophy

Most people hear the word culture and don’t bat an eye. The word may conjure up images of different people's customs in different regions of the world, as well as art, music, literature, and entertainment. But how many stop to think that the word also implies belief? After all, its root word is cult, which literally means a group of people blindly following an authoritarian figure; sometimes straight to their death. Our current health paradigm is not based on actual science, and is indeed, a cult; the cult of the Germ.  

In my last post, the final installment of my Mystery Babylon series, I explained the esoteric symbolism behind the logo of the medical industry; two snakes wrapped around a staff. I also explained how the Greek translation of the biblical word sorcery is pharmakeia, where we get our modern day word pharmacy and pharmaceutical. What I didn't tell you is that pharmakeia is the abstract noun that means sorcery, witchcraft, and magic, and pharmakon is the concrete noun that means poison, magic potion, or charm, which in our modern day, translate as remedy, medicine, or drug. Most people think that the medical staff is a symbol of health and healing, but in reality it is just the opposite; its an occult symbol reminding us of who thinks he is really in charge of our bodies: Lucifer, the god of this world. Notice the image below:

As you can see, the medical staff is coming from the genitals of the Baphomet. It is not necessarily a sexual symbol but a symbol of power, or generation. The Baphomet itself is a symbol that goes back to the Knight's Templar and represents a half-man, half-goat demonic being; a representation of the higher and lower self. Notice the head: the horns, ears, and chin are encapsulated in an imaginary pentagram; a satanic symbol. Albert Pike, in Morals and Dogma, referred to the Baphomet as the "hermaphroditic goat of Mendes." 

The mythical Greek god Hermes was an interesting character. He was known to easily travel across the gulf between the mortal and divine, assisting souls crossing into the underworld. He was also known as the trickster god, and was associated with symbols such as the rooster (remember the Abraxas from my last post?), the tortoise, winged sandals, a winged helmet, and the caduceus; which is a winged staff with two snakes copulating (the medical staff). In Roman mythology Hermes was known as Mercury, which comes from the Latin word merx, meaning "merchant." The above image should be starting to make sense to you now; the medical industry consists of merchants (drug companies) that are tricking you into purchasing their products, which are actually poisons that manipulate your body into masking the symptoms that are attempting to warn you of disease. Here is how John the revelator described these merchants of future Mystery Babylon:
...for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived. (Revelations 18:23)

Again, the word sorceries comes from the Greek word pharmakeia. The entire world has been under a ubiquitous spell for the last 100 years or so. The American Medical Association (AMA) was co-opted by the Rockefeller foundation in the early 1900s, which began pouring donations into it and several universities training prospective doctors. This gave them more control over the curriculum and licensing regulations, and they were able to limit the supply of doctors, which used to be mainly chiropractors and osteopaths (DOs). Holistic modalities were gradually replaced with allopathic ones, changing the focus of the treatment of the entire body from herbs, nutrition, spinal adjustments, exercise, and stress relief modalities, to drugs and "medicine."

The vaccine movement, the medical establishment's adopted man-child, had its inception in England in the early 1820s. Edward Jenner was the first "quack" to inoculate cowpox into children in an attempt to cure or prevent smallpox. It didn't work, yet after Jenner lobbied the House of Commons, England began a forced vaccination campaign on its population despite a lack of evidence on the safety and efficacy of the vaccines. Many people died or suffered vaccine damage, and the rate of smallpox actually increased in spite of vaccine mandates. The word vaccine comes from the scientific name for cowpox, variolae vaccinae, and was coined by Louis Pasteur in 1891. Vacca is the Latin word for cow, thus vaccine literally means the puss of cows. This man, Jenner, is celebrated by the medical establishment as the father of immunology, and not surprisingly made similar arguments promoting vaccines that we hear today. Even though the vaccinated still contracted small pox, Jenner asserted that they caught a milder form of the disease, and even though many died from the side effects of the jab, Jenner surmised that the benefits outweighed the risks:

The happy effects of inoculation, with all the improvements which the practice has received since its first introduction into this country, not very unfrequently produces deformity on the skin, and sometimes, under the best management, proves fatal. (Vaccine Safety Manual, Neil Z. Miller, p. 39)

This whole paradigm is based upon the concept that germs exist outside of our bodies and become pathogenic when they get inside us, or when we "catch" them from another person or animal. The modern medical establishment is based upon, and profit's immensely from, this paradigm. The merchants have the perfect money-making scheme going for them: germs are ubiquitous and are what make us sick, so we need several vaccinations throughout our childhood and adulthood to "protect" us from the diseases caused by these germs. Only a few companies offer these vaccinations, and they simultaneously enjoy governmental advertising campaigns and mandates for public school attendance. Anyone with a semi-rational brain can follow the money and see what is going on here; this is crony capitalism on stilts.

The real history of germs has been intentionally buried, along with the mystery of what really makes us sick. Just like everything else in Mystery Babylon land, the truth is the exact opposite of what we have been taught. I'm going to take you down yet another rabbit hole in what follows, and you will learn the real function of germs in the body, the real cause of disease, and the real history that has disappeared down the memory hole. This is a fascinating subject and again I implore you to do your own research and come to your own conclusions; your future health may depend on it. 

Germs Don't Make You Sick

The "Germ Theory" of medicine has been around for a long time, at least since the Renaissance and even back to ancient Greece, but it really came into its own in the 1800s after the work of one of the greatest academic frauds and plagiarists in history: Louis Pasteur. 

Pasteur is heralded by the medical establishment as the discoverer of Germ Theory. He conducted experiments by injecting bacterium into the brains of animals attempting to make them sick by "contagion." And get sick they did; in fact, many of them died (but not from the bacteria). He is also the father of pasteurization, the process of heating milk to destroy the "harmful" bacteria and literally everything else that is good and nutritious in it. 

First and foremost, you need to know that this guy was a fraud. He plagiarized the work of others and twisted it to fit his own theories. Here is an excerpt from Dr. Thomas Cowan's book, The Truth About Contagion:

Pasteur passed his laboratory notebooks along to his heirs with the provision that they never made the notebooks public. However, his grandson, Louis Pasteur Vallery-Radot, who apparently didn't care for Pasteur much, donated the notebooks to the French national library, which published them. In 1914, Professor Gerard Geison of Princeton University published an analysis of these notebooks, which revealed that Pasteur had committed massive fraud in all his studies. For instance, when he said that he injected virulent anthrax spores into vaccinated and unvaccinated animals, he could trumpet the fact that the unvaccinated animals died, but that was because he also injected those unvaccinated animals with poisons.

In the notebooks, Pasteur states unequivocally that he was unable to transfer disease with a pure culture of bacteria (he obviously wasn't able to purify viruses at that time.) In fact, the only way he could transfer disease was to either insert the whole infected tissue into another animal (he would sometimes inject ground-up brains of an animal into the brain of another animal to "prove" contagion) or resort to adding poisons to his culture, which he knew would cause the symptoms in the recipients. 

He admitted that the whole effort to prove contagion was a failure, leading to his famous deathbed confession: "The germ is nothing; the terrain is everything." In this case, terrain refers to the condition of the animal or person and whether the animal or person had been subject to poison.

Since Pasteur's day, no one has demonstrated experimentally the transmissibility of disease with pure cultures of bacteria and viruses. (p. 21, Kindle version, Emphases added)

It wasn't the germs that Pasteur was injecting into his animal subjects that were making them sick; it was the poisons he was injecting along with them. Notice he stated that he could not "transfer disease with a pure culture of bacteria." That is because germs do not make you sick; the conditions present in your body determine sickness, or dis-ease.

Before I move on to explain the "terrain theory" of disease, a little history of the Spanish flu will help prove to you that contagion is not what you think it is. Re-read the last line of the quote above; no one has been able to prove that disease is communicable through exposure to germs. Despite the lack of empirical evidence for this theory, our entire medical paradigm is based upon it. The Spanish flu affected over a third of the world's population in 1918, killing about fifty million people. Just like today in this Covid-crazy world, governments restricted the freedom to gather and travel, imposed mask mandates, shut down schools and businesses, and discouraged shaking hands and other forms of human affection. This has all been done before folks; there is nothing new under the sun (Corona means sun). An interesting historical tidbit is that experiments were performed on volunteers to see if the Spanish flu could be spread through contagion from person to person. All the experiments failed. Here is another except from Dr. Cowan's book that will be eye-opening:

Health officials were desperate to find a cause. The team of physicians from the US Public Health Service tried to infect their one hundred healthy volunteers at a naval facility on Gallops Island in Boston Harbor. A sense of frustration pervades the report, written by Milton J. Rosenau, MD, and published in the Journal of the American Medical Association. Rosenau had built a successful career in public health by instilling a fear of germs, overseeing quarantines, and warning the public about the dangers of raw milk. He believed that something called Pfeiffer bacillus was the cause. The researchers carefully extracted throat and nasal mucus and even lung material from cadavers and transferred it to the throats, respiratory tracks, and noses of volunteers. "We used some billions of these organisms, according to our estimated counts, on each one of the volunteers, but none of them took sick," he said. 

Then they drew blood from those who were sick and injected it into ten volunteers. "None of these took sick in any way." Thoroughly perplexed, Rosenau and the other researchers designed the next experiment "to imitate the natural way in which influenza spreads, at least the way in which we believe influenza spreads, and I have no doubt it does [even though his experiments showed it doesn't] -- by human contact." They instructed those afflicted to breathe and cough over volunteers. "The volunteer was led up to the bedside of the patient; he was introduced. He sat down alongside the bed of the patient. They shook hands, and by instructions, he got as close as he conveniently could, and they talked for five minutes. At the end of five minutes, the patient breathed out as hard as he could, while the volunteer, muzzle to muzzle (in accordance with his instructions, about 2 inches between the two), received this expired breath, and at the same time was breathing in as the patient breathed out. This they repeated five times." The volunteers were watched carefully for seven days, but alas, "none of them took sick in any way." (p. 25, Emphases added)

So if germs don't cause illness or spread by contagion, what is out there making everyone sick? How do we explain epidemics and pandemics? Why do colds and flus seem to jump around and "infect" everyone during certain seasons? And how in the world do we explain Anthrax, Swine and Bird Flu, Ebola, Malaria, HIV, Aids, Herpes, and Covid-19? 

Before we get to all of that, we have to know how the body really works, and how germs work with it or against it. To do that I have to introduce a scientist whose name and work went down the memory hole over one-hundred years ago. But he may have made one of the most important biological discoveries in history. 

Enter Pierre Jacques Antoine Bechamp

Antoine Bechamp was one of France's finest scientists and academics, and was a professor of Medical Chemistry and Pharmacy during the mid 1800s. Bechamp was a contemporary of Pasteur, and the two of them knew and wrote about each other. But unlike Pasteur, Bechamp was honest, and was on a mission to discover the true nature of germs and their role in biology. Everything that I am about to present here comes from a forgotten book by Ethel D. Hume, written in 1923, entitled Bechamp or Pasteur: A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology. I highly recommend this book; it is intensively comprehensive and extremely informative. Hume is very thorough. 

Bechamp was curious about the phenomenon of fermentation, and began conducting experiments involving the conversion of cane sugar to mold in a medium of water. He wanted to know where the "germs" came from that fermented the sugars. Around the same time Pasteur was conducting similar experiments and came up with the theory of "spontaneous generation," or that the germs causing the ferment magically spawned out of nowhere when yeast was introduced to sugar. Bechamp observed that these microorganisms, which he called "little bodies," were already abundant in all matter and in the air. He concluded that these airborne germs found his sugar solution a suitable medium for their proliferation:

Hence I became assured that what that which is called fermentation is in reality the phenomenon of nutrition, assimilation, and disassimilation, and the excretion of the products diassimilated. (Hume, Kindle version, p. 19)

Later on Pasteur began copying Bechamp's experiments and conveniently came the to the same conclusion after scrapping his "spontaneous generation" theory. He began to believe that germs came from the air and invaded their hosts from the outside in, a theory espoused by Italian physician Dr. Marcus Plenciz in 1762.  Bechamp discovered the exact opposite; that germs were already inside of us and had a symbiotic relationship with our bodies, and that the terrain of the host determined whether the germs became pathogenic. 

Bechamp would later name his "little bodies" microzymas, Greek for "small ferment," and discovered that they existed in all organic matter, both in healthy and diseased tissue. He believed that these microorganisms were the building blocks of all life, rather than biological cells, and that they existed to either build up or decompose an organism, depending on its state of health. He concluded that microzymas could rapidly evolve into bacteria depending on the medium they were in, and that bacteria were pleomorphic, or form changing, depending on the conditions of their environment. Here are his four main discoveries as pointed out by Hume:

1. He demonstrated that the atmosphere is filled with minute living organisms capable of causing fermentation in any suitable medium, and that the chemical change in the medium is affected by a ferment engendered by them, which ferment may well be compared to the gastric juice of the stomach.

2. He found in ordinary chalk, and afterwards in limestone, minute organisms capable of producing fermentative changes, and showed these to bear relation to the infinitesimal granulations he had observed in the cells and tissues of plants and animals. He proved these granulations, which he name microzymas, to have independent individuality of life, and claimed that they are the antecedents of cells, the genesis of bodily forms; the real anatomical, incorruptible elements. 

3. He set forth that organisms in the air, the so-called atmospheric germs, are simply either microzymas or their evolutionary forms set free by disruption from their former vegetable or animal habitat, and that the "little bodies" in the limestone and chalk are the survivors of the living forms of past ages.

4. He claimed that... microzymas constantly develop into the low type of living organisms that go by the name of bacteria. (Ibid, p. 200-01)

He verified these observations by two experiments that lasted around fifteen years. He decomposed two kittens in glass jars: the first lasting 6-1/2 years and the second over 7 years. He observed microzymas in limestone and chalk, and included those in the jar with the first kitten. After 6-1/2 years all that was left was bone, on which he found swarms of microzymas. In the second experiment he isolated the heart and liver from the rest of the kitten and sealed them in air tight jars. After 7 years he found microzymas in every jar, including where the liver and heart had been. He was convinced that that these microzymas were the biological basis of all life. They were present everywhere, and could remain dormant for indefinite lengths of time -he estimated millions of years. They could morph into any bacteria or fungi, and were part of the "dust of the earth" that both gives life and takes it away. 

Bechamp's microzyma theory seems to be consistent with scripture. Consider the following from the Joseph Smith translation of Genesis:

By the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, until thou shalt return unto the ground - for thou shalt surely die - for out of it was thou taken: for dust thou wast, and unto dust shalt thou return. (Moses 4:25, Emphasis added)

The Lord seems to be describing a cycle of life of death. There must be something in the dust that is able to create and destroy life. There are dozens of references to "dust" in the scriptures, including the phrase" I, the Lord God, formed man from the dust of the ground." Bechamp discovered hoards of these microzymas in limestone and chalk, which in a geological sense, are definitely considered dust. The microzymas not only create life, they clean up the mess of death, and make sure everything returns to mother earth. When a corpse decomposes no one questions the process; no one claims that maggots were the cause of death. Similarly, no thinking person would blame firemen for causing the fire they are attempting to put out. 

We can think of bacteria and fungi in the same way; they are the clean up crew of nature. They show up on the scene when healthy tissue becomes diseased (or when the body's medium is changed) through poor diet and nutrition, high stress, lack of exercise, exposure to environmental toxins, and emotional and mental imbalance. At first the "germs" show up to remove toxins and try to heal the damage which causes a cytokine storm and makes the person "sick." The germs do not causes the symptoms of being sick, i.e., cough, runny nose, fever, headache, sore throat, etc. Your own body is doing that in an attempt to clear out the toxins. Your body and the germs work together to purge toxins in an attempt to keep you alive and healthy. In fact, many bacteria are capable of consuming toxins and excreting them in a benign, water soluble form that can easily exit your body, while gut bacteria help you assimilate and digest vitamins, minerals, and fiber. However, if toxins have been building for many years, or malnutrition has been going on too long, the germs morph into another form that may become fatal to the host. They do this in response to the signals that your body is giving them that it is time to return to mother earth, and thus they begin the process of dissimilation. 

What I have just described is the Terrain Theory of health. In this paradigm good or poor health is a choice for the individual, not some random chance of "catching" a bug that can make you sick or even kill you. If the body is fed properly, loved properly, balanced emotionally, and not overburdened with environmental toxins, then contracting dis-ease is much less likely. In the current paradigm, personal health is outsourced to the so-called medical authorities, who inject you with poisons to "prevent" disease and give you antibiotics to kill the germs that "cause" disease. These, and other drugs that mask symptoms of "mystery diseases" (such as autoimmune), are the only tools they have to work with; they have virtually no training on nutrition or emotional, mental, or spiritual health modalities. They want you to trust in them to protect you from the myriad of airborne germs that are lurking in dark corners, patiently waiting to "infect" you with disease. In this paradigm the individual is helpless to control his own health destiny, he must be constantly afraid of outside germs, and he must trust in the "authorities" to protect him from the invisible invaders. This system was designed to destroy your health autonomy and make you a slave to the medical establishment. It is based upon fear, the ultimate controlling emotion. 

The Terrain Theory was much more accepted during the 19th Century than we are led to believe. Even Florence Nightingale, the most famous nurse in history, subscribed to it:

Diseases are not individuals arranged in classes, like cats and dogs, but conditions, growing out of one another. It is not living in a continual mistake to look upon diseases as we do now, as separate entities, which must exist, like cats and dogs, instead of looking upon them as conditions, like a dirty and a clean condition, and just as much under our control; or rather as the reactions of kindly nature, against the conditions in which we have placed ourselves.

I was brought up to believe that smallpox, for instance, was a thing of which there was once a first specimen in the world, which went on propagating itself, in a perpetual chain of descent, just as there was a first dog, (or a first pair of dogs) and that smallpox would not begin by itself, any more than a new dog would begin without there having been a parent dog.

Since then I have seen with my own eyes and smelled with my own nose smallpox growing up in first specimens, either in closed rooms or in overcrowded wards, where it could not by any possibility have been 'caught', but must have begun. I have seen diseases begin, grow up, and turn into one another. Now, dogs do not turn into cats.

I have seen, for instance, with a little overcrowding, continued fever grow up; and with a little more, typhoid fever; and with a little more, typhus, and all in the same ward or hut. Would it not be far better, truer, and more practical, if we looked upon diseases in this light (for diseases, as all experience shows, are adjectives, not noun-substantives):

-True nursing ignores infection, except to prevent it. Cleanliness and fresh air from open windows, with unremitting attention to the patient, are the only defence [sic] a true nurse either asks or needs.

-Wise and human management of the patient is the best safeguard against infection. The greater part of nursing consists of preserving cleanliness.

-The specific disease doctrine is the grand refuge of weak, uncultured, unstable minds, such as now rule in the medical profession. There are no specific diseases; there are specific disease conditions. (Hume, p. 12-13, Emphasis original) 

 According to Hume, Mrs. Nightingale made this statement 17 years before Pasteur took credit for "discovering" the Germ Theory. Statements like this have been scrubbed from the medical literature because they clash with the official narrative. Powerful organizations do not like unvarnished history.

Notice I did not include viruses with the germs that are formed from microzymas; that is because they don't exist. This next rabbit hole may cause you some cognitive dissonance; try to have an open mind as we descend. 

Viruses = Exosomes

A virus is a strange concept. According to medical authorities, it is a piece of genetic material that is neither alive nor dead. It uses RNA in your cells to replicate itself by the billions yet it does not eat or excrete. It is 30,000 times smaller than bacteria, and it cannot be killed by antibiotics or any conventional treatment. Indeed, it has to "run it course" and your body has to fight it off and form antibodies to it, which remain in your body and keep you from getting the same virus again. 

The above summation of virology that most of us subscribe to today is false. There is no such thing as a virus in today's sense of the term. When we look at the etymology of the word we find that it never had anything to do with "infection" or "germs." Virus is a Latin word that originally meant poisonous substance, sap of plants, slimy liquid, potent juice, poisonous fluid, venom, or toxin. It wasn't until the 1790s that it began to be associated with infectious disease, at a time when they didn't have the technology to see things that small. The belief that viruses are infectious agents began as a superstition, and still is today, although a very convenient one for health authorities. In fact, a virus is the perfect boogieman to keep people in fear: it is ubiquitous, 30K times smaller than bacteria that already require a microscope to see, it travels through the air, it can strike at any time, and is lurking in the bodies of our closest friends and loved ones. Again, all false; viruses are already inside us, and they aren't germs at all. 

In chapter 6 of Dr. Cowan's book, The Truth About Contagion, he explains what exosomes are. They are identical in size to viruses, and they are excreted from the cells. Dr. Cowan explains that in the early 1800s with the invention of the light microscope, scientists were able to see bacteria in the blood of people who were sick, so they began associating bacteria with sickness. But remember, correlation is not causation. The presence of germs does not mean they are the cause of disease, just as the presence of firemen does not mean that they started the fire. Scientists began to notice that bacteria were not always present in illness, and began to speculate that perhaps there were smaller pathogens that they couldn't see that were responsible for the sickness (one example Dr. Cowan points out is that Pasteur could not find a bacterial agent for rabies in dogs) . 

Then the electron microscope came out, and they could see tiny particles, thousands of times smaller than bacteria, at the site of disease. Just as they were able to see variations in bacteria, they could also see variations in the smaller particles, which coincided with different illnesses. They found that these particles could move in and out of cells, and therefore could "invade" other cells, and even travel to new hosts. They speculated that the particles could co-opt "the machinery of the cell like parasites, turning the cells into slaves, meaning the cell would do the bidding of its new master, the infecting particle" (Cowan, p. 79). Hence the modern day theory of virology was born, but scientists weren't looking at viruses, they were looking at exosomes. Here is how Dr. Cowan describes these tiny particles:
Exosomes are simple, well-characterized features in the cells of all creatures, and conventional scientists have carefully elucidated their functions. When a living organism is threatened in almost any way - through starvation, chemical poisoning, or electromagnetic effects - the cells and tissues have a mechanism for "packaging," "propagating" and releasing these poisons. Modern researchers have shown that exosomes have exactly the same attributes as "viruses." They are the same size, contain the same components, and act on the same receptors. (p. 79)

The main function of exosomes is to clear toxins from the cells of the body; they help human beings and animals adapt to increasing environmental toxins, such as pesticides, herbicides, glyphosate (Round Up) in wheat, air pollution, processed food, radioactive pollution, and EMF's from electronics and ubiquitous Wi-Fi. And most recently, 5G technology. According to Dr. Cowan, if we impede the process of our cells shedding these exosomes, we risk a greater amount of toxicity building in the body. In other words, if we take drugs and medicines that alleviate the symptoms of sickness, less toxins are able to escape, which can lead to serious disease in the long run. Similarly, when we take antibiotics to kill the bacteria that we think is causing the sickness, they are able to consume and excrete less toxins, and they continue to build in the body. How foolish would it be to kill the firemen who are trying to put out a fire?1

1. I’m not saying that antibiotics are not necessary for certain conditions, but they are overprescribed for common ailments and can cause dysbiosis of the gut flora. They have been used to save lives and have their place, but only as a last resort. The word antibiotic literally means "against life."

Indeed, if it weren't for exosomes and bacteria, humanity would not survive in this toxic world. Exosomes have more functions than just detoxification, they are part of an entire microscopic world of intercommunication and coordination in the body and between bodies. Consider the following from Dr. Cowan:

Far from acting as hostile invading viruses, exosomes provide a brilliant system of communication within an organism to rid the cells of tissues and poisons and then communicate to the rest of the organism what has happened. Far from acting as a source of illness, these particles are an integral part of our detoxification system. They are the true firemen, obviously present in higher numbers in cases of disease, in which a higher burden of poisoning has occurred.

In fact, these "viruses" are not invaders but toxin-gobbling messengers that our cells produce to help us adjust to environmental assaults, including electro-smog. After all, most people have adjusted to worldwide radio waves, electricity in our homes, and ubiquitous Wi-Fi - and the sparrow population rebounded after the Great Plague of 1738. It is exosomes that allowed all this to happen. These tiny messengers provide real-time and rapid genetic adaptation to environmental changes...

There is now clear experimental evidence that exosomes made by on organism can be picked up by other organisms (of the same or different species) and cause protective reactions in these new organisms. (p. 80-81)

We are all here and alive on earth today because of God's foreknowledge. He knew that there would be an abundance of environmental toxins in the latter days, and he equipped our bodies with an intricate system of eliminating them. With this in mind, let's re-read D&C 89:4 and let it sink in:

Behold, verily, thus the sayeth the Lord unto you: In consequence of evils and designs which do and will exist in the hearts of conspiring men in the last days, I have warned you, and forewarn you, by giving you this word of wisdom by revelation. (Emphasis added)

When the Lord starts off with "thus sayeth the Lord," we should pay attention; the entire point of the word of wisdom is to protect us from conspiring men in the latter days. Men who have conspired to change the constitution of grains by genetically modifying them, who have removed the nutrition from processed food, who have hidden the true cause of disease, and built a false paradigm that incorporates a system of outsourcing our health. The word of wisdom tells us to do what? Eat... real... food. Food that strengthens our body's systems of building up healthy tissues and removing toxins. These foods are fruits, herbs, vegetables, nuts, seeds, meat (especially organ meats, fat, and bone broth), and properly prepared ancient grains (not modern grains). I went through a health crisis myself a few years ago, and the only thing that healed me was food and learning to deal with stress. For any of you struggling with health, please read Sally Fallon Morell’s books, she is the president of the Weston A. Price Foundation. Start with this one. Trust me, you will feel better as soon as you start eating this way. 

After reading this you might be thinking that if viruses don't exist than what about modern testing that "proves" you have caught one; like say the PCR test for Covid? Well, you may not be surprised to learn that officials from the CDC have admitted that the PCR test is unreliable, and that the only doctor to have ever isolated a pure virus from a serum discovered that it wasn't a virus at all. 

Virology is a House of Cards

Back in the 1980s, there was a doctor who figured out how to isolate a pure "virus" from algae. His name is Stefan Lanka, and he discovered that the "virus" was not what he thought it was. Dr. Lanka is a virologist from Germany, and he found tiny particles in algae that he believed were viruses, so he developed a system of isolating them for study, a system that is not used today by modern virologists. According to Dr. Cowan:
He ground up the algae in a sort of blender... then he purified this mixture using an extremely fine filter to separate out particles the size of viruses from everything else... Then he put the mixture into a density-gradient centrifuge, which spins the solution and allows the particles to separate out into bands. The final step uses a micropipette to suck out the band that contains only the virus. This simple procedure is the gold standard for the purification and isolation of a virus from any tissue or solution. (p. 68-69)

Dr. Lanka then observed the pure viruses with an electron microscope, and found something quite surprising; the algae with higher concentrations of viruses were healthier. He surmised that these particles were not viruses at all, but some kind of genetic material that was vital to the health of the host. He concluded that just as it is important to have a healthy and flourishing microbiome of varying bacteria, a healthy organism needed to have a virome as well. Dr. Cowan describes how Dr. Lanka began to question the testing procedures of his colleagues:

When Lanka realized that workers in the field of modern virology were never isolating, purifying, or properly characterizing "viruses" but instead confusing what they were finding with artifacts made by their propagation techniques, he naturally questioned whether the viruses that supposedly were causing disease even existed. (p. 69)

Not only were they not isolating a pure virus, they were also adding other ingredients to the mix. For example, the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test used for Covid is done by getting a sample from a sick person, such as sputum from the sinus cavity, and centrifuging but not filtering it. Here is how Dr. Cowan describes the rest of this kooky process:

The centrifuged material contains bacteria and perhaps viruses [exosomes], fungi, human cells, cell debris, and anything else found in the lungs or sinus passage of a sick person. Researchers then inoculate this unpurified mess onto "living tissue" to make it "grow." Sometimes this tissue is lung cancer tissue, sometimes aborted fetal tissue, and sometimes tissue from monkey kidneys. In any case, it is a complex mixture of many components, known and unknown. And because this "virulent, infectious virus" won't infect and kill this living tissue unless you starve and poison the tissue first, you deprive the tissue of nutrients and add oxidizing agents to "weaken" the tissue. Then you add antibiotics to make sure it's not bacteria that is killing the tissue. 

The tissue from this treatment naturally disintegrates into thousands of components. Then you centrifuge this mess again to find your "virus." At that point, you start the PCR testing to determine the genetic and protein makeup of this "virus." The problem is that (unlike the clear situation that Lanka encountered) in this slapdash way, you never have isolated the intact "virus" as a reference to allow you to know which genetic parts of your unpurified mess actually belong to the "virus" you are trying to characterize. (p. 70-71)

Dr. Cowan also explains that the PCR test is what is known as a surrogate test, meaning that "it does not find a virus; rather, it finds something else to indicate the presence of a virus" (p. 71). In other words, the test is looking for a likelihood and not a certainty; it's their best guess at finding a needle in a haystack. The PCR test is scientifically meaningless, and "health" authorities have shut the entire world down based on a virus that has never been isolated. But don't take Dr. Cowan's word for this, because hordes of virologists and immunologists readily admit this. In this article cited in Dr. Cowan's book, the authors cite four "scientific" studies where the authors admit they never isolated or purified the SARS-CoV-2 virus. But here is the real smoking gun admission in a file from the CDC and the FDA in March of 2020:

Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCOv is the causative agent for clinical symptoms... this test [the PCR test] cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens. (p. 74)

The entire thing is based upon a system of belief, not fact. All a person has to do is simply read a few articles and statements from the CDC itself to see the mass fraud that is going on here; but most people will not do that. They will continue to trust in health authorities and demagogues like Dr. Fauci (who is not a real doctor and who has never seen a single patient) rather than doing their own research. They refuse to believe that a lie so big could be perpetuated by the government and those who profess to care about our health. According to Adolph Hitler, a big lie is much easier to believe than a small one; propaganda masters know this and exploit it. Consider this quote from Hitler's Mein Kampf:

In the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata [i.e. layers] of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victim to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. (Quoted in D. Christian Markham, There are Save Two Churches Only, p. 158, Emphasis added)

The "big" lie in health goes far beyond Covid-19 testing; the entire paradigm of Germ Theory is based on fraud and pseudo-science. A true virus as an "infectious agent" has never been isolated. All they can see on an electron microscope are "tiny particles" (exosomes) that are emitted from the cell and contain genetic information, which have never been proven to cause disease, yet we are told that germs are out there making us sick.

Dr. Lanka is still around and writing articles. This one, entitled All Claims About Viruses and Pathogens are False, is succinct and revealing. Please read it and come to your own conclusions; there is no dearth from a lack of research to prove that the medical paradigm is false. Everything is hidden in plain sight; they are just banking on you not looking. 

AIDS Inc: It's All Been Done Before

In the late 1980s, independent investigative journalist Jon Rappoport wrote a book called AIDS Inc, in which he documented the AIDS fraud being perpetuated by the medical establishment at the time (and Fauci was involved). He discovered, along with many others, that the narrative that HIV virus caused AIDS was a myth, and that it was not spread through contagion. AIDS was a disease of immunodeficiency, but it was not caused by a germ called HIV, it was a disease of a body overburdened with toxins from illegal drug abuse, poor diet, promiscuous lifestyle, psychotropic medications, and other toxic drugs. Here is a list of  contradictions he encountered in his research:

1. AIDS patients were dying of all sorts of infections and illnesses.
2. AIDS did not attack T-cells as touted by medical authorities, in fact, the entire concept of the immune system was flawed.
3. The symptoms of AIDS were general and a matched a host of other diseases.
4. Slim (wasting disease) was considered synonymous with AIDS.
5. Testing positive for AIDS did not mean you had AIDS.
6. Testing positive for HIV did not mean you had AIDS.
7. It was a disease of homosexuals in America, but in Africa it was mostly in heterosexuals; how did the disease know how to discriminate?
8. If you were diagnosed with an "AIDS" indicator disease, and even though you tested negative for HIV, you could still be diagnosed with AIDS. 
9. Symptoms of AIDS matched several autoimmune diseases such as Lupus, Hashimoto's, and Grave's disease. 
10. The drug prescribed for AIDS, AZT, was extremely dangerous and had side effects similar to chemo therapy. 

Here is a list of Jon's conclusions:

  • There is no disease-entity which ought to be called AIDS. AIDS is not one thing.
  • The HIV virus has never been proved to cause any disease of any kind.
  • The treatment for AIDS patients, AZT, can be dangerous.
  • No conclusive proof exists that we have a contagious epidemic caused by a virus. 
  • The AIDS blood tests which have existed up to May, 1988, are unreliable. And, of course, they are testing for exposure to a virus which has not been proven to cause any illness.
  • Efforts to develop an AIDS vaccine, likewise, are aimed at preventing infection by HIV, which has not been proven to be harmful to anybody.
  • The various definitions of AIDs, used to make diagnoses around the world, are useless and vague. They certainly function to terrorize people. They also, by semantic juggling, promote vastly increased numbers of AIDS cases, which naturally leads to the wide marketing of highly profitable pharmaceuticals as treatments.
  • Official symptoms of pre-AIDs, AIDS, dementia, slim - whatever title you use - can all around be accounted for by the effects of medical and street-drugs, or by older forms of illness. 
  • There is no proof that one malady called AIDS exists.
  • Many episodes of traditional sexually transmitted diseases, like gonorrhea and syphilis, along with massive amounts of antibiotics, can cause a great deal of immunosuppression. Rejecting HIV as the cause of disease therefore does not imply an endorsement of free-for-all sex. 
  • The label AIDS has a devastating psychological and emotional impact. On close inspection, it means almost nothing. The closest symptom to it is Human Immune Suppression, which of course has hundreds of causes...
  • What is AIDS actually, when you strip away the terroristic label? As I say, it is not one thing. It is any form of immunosuppression, from any source, which gives rise to opportunistic infections. (AIDS Inc., Chapter Two)

Covid-19 is AIDS on stilts; like AIDS, Covid is a catch-all for all modern sickness. AIDS was a trial run and Covid is the real program -government program, that is. These "epidemics" were created to control you through fear. In 2011 Jon Rappoport interviewed a retired propagandists for the Deep State; he went by the pseudonym Ellis Medavoy, and Rappoport published the interviews in three volumes entitled, The Matrix Revealed. To get a copy you have to go his website,, and pay for it. Trust me, it's worth it, it will blow your mind. Here is what Medavoy said about AIDS:

Q (Jon): Say what? AIDS in not a germ?

A (Ellis): That's right.

Q: AIDS wasn't created in that way.

A: No.

Q: But it was an idea.

A: The idea of a global plague. People were dying. But it's all about making the public believe in a particular causation, a causation which can arrive at any moment without preface and kill anyone at random. The perfect terrorist...

Q: What was the point of view you were hired to front for?

A: That HIV was the sole and only cause of AIDs, in America, Africa, and everywhere... We had to coalesce scientific and public opinion...

Q: So you got articles planted.

A: Sure.

Q: Were there lies in those articles?

A: AIDS is a lie. Therefore, everything after that is automatically a lie.

Q: The articles you had planted-

A: -Presented a kind of specious science that made it seem like HIV was the causative factor behind AIDS... when in fact that wasn't the case...

Q: And with AIDS?

A: There was a period during which HIV was not as firmly established in the public mind as the cause of AIDS as it is now. Some reporters were looking into the possibility that HIV was bad science. Which it was. So we provided unofficial government sources who would tell these reporters that, not only was HIV the cause of AIDs, but it was far more dangerous than anyone suspected. It could kill at a range of thirty years. It could sit inside the body for all that time, doing nothing, and then it could come out of hiding and destroy the immune system. You see? Make it seem even more horrible, and then you get agreement on the lesser fact, that HIV causes AIDs in the first place. (The Matrix Revealed, Volume 1, p. 5-8) 

What Medavoy is describing is how propaganda works; a lot of research goes into how to control the masses through fear and disinformation. The idea of germs is a psychological weapon used by the State to manipulate and control you. And most currently, with Covid they are attempting to destroy some of the last vestiges of our inalienable rights; the right to control our own bodies and health. 

The state of the body's health is up to the steward of the body. What you eat and drink, the way you deal with physical, psychological, and emotional stress, and how you perceive the world all affect your health. Our health is not helplessly determined by our genes, or germs that we might "catch"; it is determined by our individual choices. God created an amazing body for you; one that avoids disease if you give it what it needs. There is only one scripture in the Book of Mormon that addresses health, and it does not mention germs as the cause of disease; rather it says that it was the nature of the climate that subjected the Nephites to sickness. Environment, not germs:

And there were some who died with fevers, which at some seasons of the year were very frequent in the land--but not so much with fevers, because of the excellent qualities of the many plants and roots which God had prepared to remove the cause of diseases, to which men were subject by nature of the climate-- (Alma 46:40)

The True Cause of Sickness and Epidemics

But wait a minute. What about the Black Plague, what about Smallpox, what about the Spanish Flu, Polio, Bird Flue, Swine Flu, Ebola, Malaria, and a host of others? What about Covid? Surely there is something making everyone sick. What is it if not a virus? 

In chapter 3 of Dr. Cowan's book, he postulates some alternative theories on the cause of epidemics throughout history. One overlooked cause of disease has been comets that have come near the earth. Interestingly enough, comets have preceded some major plague events in world history. The plague of 542 AD in Constantinople was preceded by a comet that flew close to the earth over the Mediterranean in 536 AD. And the Black Death of Europe (1347-1350) was also predated by a comet. Dr. Cowan explains how these heavenly bodies can be toxic:
Comets contain mineral alloys requiring temperatures in the thousands of degrees, and they have sufficient energy to emit extreme UV light and even powerful X-rays. Moreover, as comets approach the sun, they can provoke high-energy discharges and flare-ups of solar plasma, which reach out to the comet. 

Thus, comets can create electrical disturbances in the atmosphere even more powerful than those created by man-made electrification - and this radiation includes demonstrably dangerous ionizing radiation. (p. 35, 38)

In addition to electrical disturbance, comets can emit toxic dust that can poison the water and the air. Was this what John the revelator saw in the last days when he described 1/3 of all life on earth being destroyed? 

And the third angel sounded, and there fell a great star from heaven, burning as it were a lamp, and it fell upon the third part of the rivers, and upon the fountains of waters; 

And the name of the star was Wormwood: and the third part of the waters became wormwood; and many men died of the waters, because they were made bitter. (Revelations 8:10-11

 Dr. Cowan also describes a host of other possible causes of disease as follows:

And if radiation poisoning - whether ionizing or nonionizing - provokes disease, there are obvious cofactors. Poisons in air, water, and food; toxins from insect bites; deadly fungi on grains; exposure to filth; malnutrition and starvation; as well as fear and despair - we don't need to resort to the notion of contagion to explain outbreaks of disease. (p. 40)

Could it be that toxins, poisons, parasites, and some fungi are responsible for most diseases? It makes sense when you start to think about it. Dr. Cowan also points out that Smallpox could have been transmitted through Bed Bug bites, who weren't injecting bacteria but toxins in their saliva. When the white man gave their blankets to the indigenous people living in the Americas, they contained Bed Bugs, and the Indians had not yet been exposed to the toxins to build an immunity to them. The saliva of an insect contains many chemical properties:

Early studies suggest that insect saliva has chemicals with vasodilatory, anticoagulant, and immunosuppressive properties... (p. 40)

He points out some other interesting facts. Malaria is thought to be caused by parasites in mosquitos, but the same species of mosquito that spreads it inhabits every continent except Antarctica. Yet malaria isn't a problem in many areas of the world. Dr. Cowan surmises that it could be that the "wetlands produce swamp gases - a mixture of hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide, and especially methane," that can cause the same symptoms of malaria, which is still prevalent in areas where people live in close proximity to swampy areas.

Other diseases throughout history were caused by unsanitary living conditions. Dr. Cowan also points out that toxins released by sewage create "conditions of low oxygen..." in which "beneficial fermentative bacteria begin producing toxins instead of helpful compounds." Low oxygen is known as hypoxia, which can be a breeding ground for anaerobic bacteria and cancer. Anaerobic bacteria, such as those present in the disease known as Cholera, produce toxins that make people sick. Again, the germ is not to blame, but the conditions of the body that signal the germ are to blame. When a person dies they lose all the oxygen in their tissues, yet germs thrive and begin the process of decomposition. 

Environmental toxins can also cause disease. An alternative theory of the cause of polio was the overuse of the now-known toxic pesticide DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane). It was sprayed everywhere and on everything without restraint. It was outlawed later when it was discovered that it caused considerable damage to the central nervous system, and cases of polio began to dissipate when it was discontinued. However, the polio vaccine was introduced at the same time and is given credit for the triumph over the disease. In fact, vaccines are credited for the disappearance of many diseases that were already on the decline because of more sanitary living conditions. 

What about cold and flu season? Aren't these viral bugs going around and making everyone sick? Think of it another way: every spring and fall things change up considerably in agriculture. Tons and tons of chemical pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides are sprayed on the millions of acres of crops throughout the world. When the plows hit the dirt in the spring and fall all that stuff gets mixed up and released into the atmosphere and our bodies have to process and excrete it. 

Also remember what the Book of Mormon said, that fevers were more frequent during some seasons of the year. There is something about the changes in the seasons that signal our bodies to detoxify all the garbage they have been storing over the past few months. This is a natural process and we should let it happen. If you eat healthier and have less toxins in you body, the symptoms of the sickness will be milder. Being sick is a blessing; it is how our bodies get rid of poisons. Also remember that in times past parents used to have measles and chicken pox parties so their kids would actually come down with these diseases. That is because having childhood diseases is a way to detox the body during certain stages of life development. There have been studies done that have shown that children who got chickenpox and recovered naturally have stronger immune systems and less chance at developing cancer when they get older. 

And what about Covid-19? There have been a lot of theories but the one that makes the most sense is the rollout of 5G. Wuhan, China, where Covid-19 started, is home to an abundance of air pollution, and combined with the 5G rollout in late 2019, created the perfect conditions for lung symptoms. There are correlations between EMF (electro-magnetic field) exposure and Covid symptoms: headaches, brain fog, sleep disturbances, fatigue, and more perniciously, cancer, Alzheimer's, infertility, and hyper-coagulation of the blood (blood clots). The human body resonates at a certain vibrational frequency that is in harmony with the earth's frequency, and EMFs disrupt that harmony. Our cells rely on our natural electricity to communicate with each other and when that gets disrupted the body becomes a bit chaotic and can become sick. However, the detox process produces exosomes that allow us to adapt to these conditions, and those exosomes signal other bodies close to us to do the same; that is why it seems like the diseases spread by contagion. The bodies that have the most toxic buildup (i.e., preexisting conditions), have the most severe symptoms, and if they are toxic enough, the body is overwhelmed by the cytokine storm and death ensues. 

Dr. Cowan also has a chapter in his book showing the history of the correlation between electricity and disease. Even earthquakes can disrupt the natural electricity that is flowing between our cells. Dr. Cowan points out that in the late 1700s, Heinrech Schweich, who wrote a book on influenza, began to notice a correlation between electrical disruption and the flu, as he could not explain transmission of the flu through contagion. Also consider this alternative explanation of the Spanish flu from Dr. Cowan:

During World War I, governments on both sides of the conflict installed antennas which eventually blanketed the earth with strong radio signals - and during the latter part of 1918, disaster struck. The Spanish flu afflicted a third of the world's population and killed about fifty million people, more than the Black Death of the fourteenth century. (p. 24-25)

For a detailed analysis of the connection between historical outbreaks and electricity, please read The Invisible Rainbow, by Arthur Firstenberg. 

A Few Final Thoughts

Obviously there is no definitive proof for anything I've presented in this post, except that it has been proven that no pure "infectious virus" has ever been isolated. The point here is that we don't have to believe the official narrative. Listen to your own intuition about health. Does it really make sense that God would expect us to outsource our health to private corporations who would inject us with poisons to "protect" us against disease? An injection that bypasses all of our own natural defense systems in the digestive track that functions as a giant filtration system for our body? When something is injected directly into the blood stream, we have no protection against it. It doesn't make any sense, except from a position of money and power from those who peddle these things. It makes much more sense that God created an intelligent body; one that is self-regulating and has the capacity to heal itself by excreting poisons through its detox pathways. Health is a personal choice, depending on how we treat and feed our bodies. God has promised us good health if we follow the word of wisdom; sometimes there are epidemics in which many people die, but we have been warned about these in scripture, and those who make better health choices seem to survive them better. Some of these epidemics are natural and some are caused by man; God will sort it all out in the end and justice will prevail. 

I'll leave you with this final thought. In this video, Dr. Cowan makes an interesting remark about masks and ribosomes; listen from the 50 minute mark to the very end. He basically says that the powers that be sometimes give us clues that they are duping us. It is part of the hubris and narcissism that is prevalent among conspirators and mystery school initiates; they love to put things in our faces because they think we are stupid. 

The word ribosomes does not mean what you think it does. It is a combination of two words, ribs and soma. Soma is the Greek word for body, and we all know what ribs are. Rib-o-somes, or ribs of the body, is just another way of describing the human body as created by God, who took the rib out of Adam to create Eve. What the powers that be are communicating through this term, according to Dr. Cowan, is that either God can create our bodies or they can. We can have a natural body or one filled with chemical concoctions and biotechnology (i.e., nanotechnology that is in the Covid Jab).  

In the late 1970s a scientist shattered the conventional view of the biological cell. His name was Dr. Harold Hillman, and he is briefly cited in the video by Dr. Cowan. He proved that ribosomes do not exist. Conventional biologists claim that ribosomes are the little granules that line the endoplasmic reticulum in the cell, and that their function is to translate messenger RNA into protein synthesis. In other words, they build things in the cell using proteins, the building blocks of human tissue. The problem is that no biologist has ever seen them. Dr. Hillman calls them artefacts, which in biology mean "a substance or structure not normally present in the matter being observed but formed by artificial means, as during preparation of a microscope slide" (Free Dictionary).

In 1980 Dr. Hillman published a book entitled, The Living Cell, in which he proved that the endoplasmic reticulum, the mitochondrial cristae, the Golgi body, and the nuclear pores, are all artefacts. His research brought him to this conclusion:
We were struck by certain important anomalies between the structure and behavior of the cell as seen by light microscopy in unfixed tissues, on the one hand, and the structure as deduced from electron microscopy in fixed tissue, on the other... We were very surprised to conclude that the commonly accepted model of the cell is impossible on geometrical and biological grounds. (p. 11, Emphasis added)

What Hillman means by "unfixed tissue" is living tissue, which means that "fixed tissue" is dead tissue. The problem comes from the techniques used to prepare "living" tissue for examination on electron microscopy. Hillman claims that there are anomalies that need to be accounted for between the limitations of microscopic technology and the procedures of preparing tissue samples. For example, Hillman considers that "tissue which is examined in the frozen, fixed, homogenised [sic], extracted, inhibited or 'poisoned' state is not normal 'living' tissue" (p.23). 

 Hillman argues that the history of histology (the study of tissue under microscope), is to stop all "functional" activity of tissue. It has to be harvested before it is looked at, thus, it is dead or dying by the time it reaches the microscope. Furthermore, Hillman asserts that in order to see an endoplasmic reticulum, the light microscope would need to be magnified six times more than is "theoretically possible under the most favourable [sic] conditions” (p. 58). If a light microscope cannot theoretically see an endoplasmic reticulum, forget about ribosomes, the much smaller granules inside of it. He also points that virtually all techniques for viewing tissue on the more advanced electron microscope involves dehydration, which skew the results, and that the electron beam emitted by the microscope "releases an enormous amount of energy" and heat onto the specimen.

Basically what it comes down to is this: man has not really observed a living cell. What made it into the biology textbooks is conjecture. Hillman says this conjecture has come to be accepted by science for the following reasons:

The artefact of histology has come to be accepted because it is reproducible and consistent and because it has proved both meaningful and useful in the more general context of biology and medicine. In the same way, the artefact of electron microscopy has became accepted. (p. 24)

It is easy and it makes sense to them to accept the anomalies as fact. Virology has become accepted in the same way. Once a theory becomes mainstream, it is very hard to unlearn. Here is what Hillman concluded about ribosomes:

The particles cannot be seen by light microscopy, and in our opinion there is insufficient evidence of subcellular biochemical activities... If the endoplasmic reticulum is an artefact due to deposit of the cytoplasm, it is very likely that the ribosomes are also a deposit. They may consist of RNA and protein in the separated fraction, but may well not be the same material as seen on electron micrographs. If RNA were lining a reticulum one might see this on ultra-violet microscopy as dark channels permeating the cytoplasm. Where the endoplasmic reticulum is believed to be restricted to a small region of the cell, that part should absorb much more ultra-violet light, due to the higher concentration of RNA. We are not aware of such appearances having been seen, nor have we seen it ourselves in neurons. (p.60-61, Emphasis added) 

We should stop and think about this. It could well be that God has not allowed man to see an unobscured cell. Maybe that kind of knowledge is too much for our finite minds, or maybe that would concentrate God-like power into the hands of "conspiring men." God told us how to be healthy in scripture, perhaps that is all we need to know. One thing is for sure, modern medicine is based upon cultish belief, not fact. The entire structure resembles a corporate religion, replete with priestly garb in the form of white robes, a hierarchy of doctors, PA's, and nurses, and authority figures like Fauci and CDC, and the WHO (World Health Organization) who receive "revelation" for those in the lower strata. And don't forget the magic and sorcery that emit from Big Pharma who has a patented "cure" for every disease; except that drugs do not cure, they merely cover up the symptoms. But what can't be covered up is the money trail from the drug companies to the FDA, to the CDC, to the WHO, and a host of other organizations. Let's put these clowns out of business by taking our health back into our own hands. 

Postscript: Additional Resources

These 4 lectures by Alex Loglia on the Bill Cooper show from the early 1990s offer a great summation of the Germ Theory fraud and Aids:

Germ Theory 1

Germ Theory 2

Germ Theory 3

Germ Theory 4

Here is a video of Dr. Andrew Kaufman (a friend of Dr. Cowan and Dr. Lanka), arguing with Judy Mikovits about virology. She has no coherent rebuttal:

Kaufman and Mikovits 

Here is another video showing a 100 year old cartoon detailing the plan for Covid-19. Start at the 15 minute mark:

It's Imminent: We're All Gonna Die

Here is the Wise Traditions podcast with Dr. Cowan and Salley Fallon Morrell explaining how the Covid virus is a myth:

Covid: There is no virus

And here is another Wise Traditions podcast with Christine Massey, a former biostatistician, who explains the problems with PCR testing:

Covid: No Record Found of SARS-COV-2

Another interesting conversation between Medavoy and Rappoport on the medical establishment:

A: Medicine is constructing total dominance over the human being. I myself go to a doctor when I need one. But the difference between between that and...

Q: The medical cartel itself...

A: We are talking about two different worlds. For a time I was used to work on recalcitrant areas where medicine was lagging behind, where people were still suspicious, and I could see that behind me and to the side of me there were incredible resources available to win our war, to make medicine the new Pope, the new king, the new general. Yet, it's faceless. That's the remarkable thing. There are no personalities. It's done as a silent army, with no visible leaders. 

Q: But there are hidden leaders?

A: Of course. Otherwise you don't really get anywhere. The real trick is making it look like the advance of pure knowledge. Nothing else. There is no one to fault. It's all knowledge. That is the spin of all time. It really is. I stand in awe of it.

Q: Who are the hidden leaders?

A: If I read my subversive history correctly, the money flowed down from the royal families of Europe and some of the Knights Templar, and the Vatican, into the hands of European banking families, like the Rothschilds, and then to Rockefeller, and the Rockefellers eliminated all the competition in America and built pharmaceutical medicine. They funded the medical schools and the foundations and the research institutes and the medical societies. It's no accident that John D. [Rockefeller], a ruthless baron, saved his reputation through the efforts of a PR man who suggested that he should be photographed for the press handing out pennies and nickels to poor children on the street. That is how his family built modern medicine. Through PR...

Q: You see a parallel between the old Vatican and modern medicine.

A: I would recommend an in-depth study of the Vatican for anyone. The doctor is built of course on the idea that a person must consult an intermediary, a priest, if he wants to make contact with the Ultimate.

Q: And who is the Ultimate supposed to be, in the case of the doctor? Who is the doctor receiving his Word from?

A: Mythically speaking, God. It's still God, although no one says it. Understand, I'm just talking about the myth. This is my area. I've done the propaganda in this area, and I see that the doctor is still the contact point for God. That's the unspoken feeling. God and deliverance from suffering and salvation. This is not just the subconscious expression of a need by a patient. It is that, but it's more. The medical superstructure is built that way. It's puzzling to me in a way, because it's so brilliant. You search and you don't find a hidden history about this. You really don't. In the case of the Vatican you can find it, if you look hard enough. You can see how those very brilliant people built their edifice. And what you can't see, you can infer quite easily. But here... it's different. It's almost as if the builders were following a blueprint that was invisible. They had other historical examples to work from. The Vatican, Egypt, Sumer. So perhaps that's it. You see, every PR man needs a hook. He needs leverage. He needs to feel it, to use it, to imply it, to bring it in behind his message. Science, absolute science and rationality. That's one strong hook. It's hard to challenge that. It's very useful as a myth. But behind that is God saving the patient. If you can tap into that - and I have, many times, in my work, even though I'm an atheist - the opposition withers in front of you. They feel it. They don't want to be seen opposing THAT. Politicians back off. That's why they will never challenge the role of medicine in this century. They would be seen as evil. In terms of sheer manipulation it's a winner like none other I've ever seen. So you see, we have here a global program that is going full steam ahead in this century. And it has the power of a religion, an unspoken religion, a global religion. I can't say this too strongly. It is a hidden religion, and that kind of force is even stronger than a religion that has all the trappings and the doctrine and the cathedrals. Walk into the Anderson Cancer Center in Texas sometime. I haven't been there in years, but you get a strange feeling... we are dealing here with a myth that can overcome countries without a single scripture. This is  a PR man's dream... you see, there are always layers of hidden factors. Sometimes it's just political... But, with modern medicine, you are also hiding a psychological myth structure that gives the whole institution its power. Its much more sinister and much more hidden. It isn't just about concealing political relationships... (The Matrix Revealed, Volume 1. pp. 23-26)

And one more book to check out on the religious nature of modern medicine:

Confessions of a Medical Heretic, by Robert S. Mendelsohn, M.D. 


  1. Mind blowing. I've never considered these concepts, nor have been exposed to them. Certainly there's much to consider, and the resources you cited would take weeks of study. Thanks for putting all this together

  2. I think the body largely knows how to heal itself. Good food, clean environment, and rest will fix almost everything. Herbs can be used to strengthen a weak body.

  3. Thanks for your blog. I've been enjoying it.

    You mentioned Sally Fallon Morell’s book. Instead of getting the book (I'm working on 3 books right now) I found a presentation she made on YouTube. I've been wondering how to get
    organ meats into my diet. Do you have any recommendations you'd like to share? I've been searching around the internet looking for ideas.

    Also, I've been wondering how that works with the word of wisdom stating that meat is to be used sparingly and only in times of winter or of famine. Does that mean eating meat in winter time when fresh produce isn't traditionally available will give you the nutrients needed (that plants can't provide) to sustain you until the next winter? Just wondering while I write here.

    1. Kevin,
      An easy way to get nutrients from organ meats into your diet is through supplements from ancestral ( You can also try beef liver onions it is not too bad if you season it enough lol. Make sure it's organic liver. As far as the WoW goes I can't really speak to that. I know that there are certain fat-soluble vitamins we CANNOT assimilate without animal fat, but the animal does not have to be killed because we can get it from milk or butter. These vitamins are A, D, E, and K2. Also, we know grains are no good in today's world because they are GMO, and grains are bad anyway unless they are prepared properly so I think there is a lot of confusion about the word of wisdom. The best things to eat are fish, organ meat, fatty meat, grass-fed butter, coconut oil, olive oil, and all herbs, vegetables, nuts, seeds, and fruits. Nuts, seeds, and grains are supposed to be soaked before you consume them to release the phyto-chemicals that actually block nutrients in you body. Also, the Bible may be a better standard than D&C 89. It recommends ruminant (beef), milk and forbids shell fish and pork because they are garbage eaters. Cows eat the cellulose that is in the grass that we can't digest and through 4 stomach chambers convert it into nutrients we can perfectly absorb in its milk and meat. Vegetarians are generally not healthy because they lack fat soluble vitamins and B12. Another great source of this information is Dr. Eric Berg on youtube. He is a keto fanatic but recommends a lot of salads and healthy animal products. I don't do full keto but I generally cut back on carbs and sugar.

    2. Thank you very much for your response. I've been trying the beef organs from I couldn't handle the 6 pills it recommends for a daily dose. I've been taking one a day for several weeks and am but by bit going to 2 per day. Very interesting that it's had such a powerful effect on me. I'm seeing parts of me (physically and spiritually) coming more to life.


This is the Place IX: A Tabernacle and an Assembly Hall

  Previously: Inhabiting the Desolate Cities Welcome readers. I'm nine posts deep into the topic of the Old World in Utah, yet I feel li...