The defining elements of the struggle of history have always been liberty versus power. Whether it was Egyptian priests, feudal lords, European kings, or American bankers, the governing classes have always sought to expropriate the wealth of the masses.
What do I mean?
There are examples of corrupt rulers in scripture, both civil and religious, but they never forced anyone, they compelled them. Even the few places where the word "force" is used in scripture do not refer to the kind of force that Satan's plan was going to impose. Compulsion is what is meant. To compel someone is to pressure them to make a choice. When forcing someone you cause them to make a choice. (Greg Wright, Satan's war on Free Agency, pp. 55-56, italics original)
Church leaders use compulsion as a model for teaching their version of the gospel in General Conference. Specifically, they use threats of falling short of salvation for venturing outside of Church-approved doctrines, books, blogs, and study materials. Those who dare to look at these un-approved sources and speak out about or write a varying historical narrative are threatened with excommunication, which most members view as synonymous with the loss of salvation.
This fearmongering is how they control you. And trust me, they know exactly what they are doing... even down to the slow, smooth, monotonous tones of their soothing voices as they speak lies to you while resting their arms on expensive pulpits.
God, on the other hand, does not use compulsion. He does not pressure you into making a choice. He presents the truth to you in scripture, He gives you all the facts, but ultimately He lets you choose. He is not a salesman, He is not trying to convince you. He is unassuming and meek. Meek means He is not presumptuous. He wants you to discover the truth for yourself. Joseph Smith described how God persuades us here, and pressuring is not part of that equation.
You're probably wondering where I'm going with all of this, especially given the picture of the renovation of the Salt Lake temple at the beginning of this post.
The question is not so much where I'm going, the question is where are they, the Church leaders, going with all this restructuring of Temple Square? What ends could they possibly have in mind and why is this renovation coinciding with Utah's smart city and other plans that will come to fruition before the year 2030?
Indeed, what are they really building and how will it affect us in the future? The stated purpose for rebuilding the Salt Lake temple is to reinforce it against earthquakes, like the one in 2020 that broke Moroni's trumpet, tipping the scales at a magnitude of 5.7.
But should this warrant an entire renovation of Temple Square and the Church Office Building Plaza?
What is that they are really bracing themselves for?
Dear readers, for this post and the next, you'll be descending down a rabbit hole that I have not written about before. So find your favorite easy-chair and get comfortable, but trust me, there will be nothing soothing, smooth, or monotonous in what follows. It will be downright uncomfortable, maybe even terrifying.
Because what I believe they are building down there has much more to do with ancient paganism than anything that can call itself Christian.
One of these City-States Looks Like the Other
We want them... to think of Salt Lake just as easily as they think of Jerusalem or the Vatican as a place where Christianity really has its heart. (See article)
Historically, both Jerusalem and the Vatican have been places where Christians have been brutalized, tortured, persecuted, marginalized, and executed. Jerusalem is not always spoken highly spoken of in the Book of Mormon. In fact, Jacob declared that it was comprised of the most wicked men on earth. Speaking of the ancient Jews, Jacob postulated that they were:
... among those who are the more wicked part of the world. And they shall crucify him - for it behooveth our God - and there is none other nation on earth that would crucify their God. (2 Nephi 7:1, RE)
In contrast, Jerusalem has also been called the "holy city" by Isaiah, referring to a future time when it will play a role in God's kingdom that will be brought about during the millennium. Historically speaking, one cannot escape the reality that only the ancient Jews were wicked enough to crucify the God of Heaven. Why would the LDS Church want to celebrate this fact?
And the Vatican... well, that is another rabbit hole all by itself. Why, oh why, would the LDS Church want visitors to think of Temple Square like they think of the Vatican?
Rome was never the darling of Christianity. It was its biggest persecutor until Constantine merged Christianity with the ancient mystery religion Rome already followed. Mary and Jesus became the new Semiramis and Tammuz, while Church and State were merged into one pontifical whole. Instead of persecuting Christians per se, they persecuted those who were at odds with pontifical authority.
Blood, carnage, torture, and death for heretics continued, just under a different name and a new regime. An old world order if you will.
Davies' statement was not just rhetoric. The design of the future Church Office Building Plaza looks eerily familiar to the layout of Vatican City. Have a look for yourself:
Notice that in both pictures, the temple overlooks the key-hole shapes of the plaza. In the middle of the key-hole at the Vatican, there is a towering Egyptian obelisk. The obelisk, in blunt terms, is a penis, the phallic symbol of the lost key of Freemasonry. It represents the generative force of Osiris, the power of the Satanic priesthood, the unlocking of primordial knowledge, or gnosis.
If you are unfamiliar with the fable of Isis and Osiris, I wrote about it here. It is important to understand to grasp the significance of what the Vatican represents. I don't see an obelisk in the future design of Temple Square, but many other elements of the Vatican can be plainly seen. And when you couple this with Nelson's 33-minute meeting with Pope Francis in 2019, taking selfies with Peter's giant key, and referring to the Pope as "his holiness," one can't help but be suspicious.
A few posts ago I offered a meaning of the word Vatican that I found online. I have since discovered a more complete etymology that should send chills down your spine. Vatican certainly seems like a Latin term, but it is derived from something that existed before Rome.
Around 1000 BC, a group of people known as the Etruscans settled in the area that comprises what is now central Italy. They were a highly advanced civilization, who introduced to the Romans the concepts of hydraulic engineering, temple building, and religious rituals.
They believed in a goddess that watched over and ruled the dead that passed into the underworld. Her name was Vatika, also rendered Vatica. She was also known as Vanth, and was depicted with wings and bearded snakes wrapped around her arms.
And who is also represented by the serpent? Lucifer.
In addition to being associated with the goddess of the underworld, Vatika was also the name of a bitter grape and a weed that grew on the slopes of Italy. When consumed, these plants would cause some to experience hallucinations that they associated with "prophetic visions."
A Latin word that was derived from Vatika is vaticinor, which means "to prophesy or foretell," and vatis means "poet, teacher, oracle." (Source article).
As you'll recall, it was the fallen angels that introduced hallucinatory herbs to mankind for the purpose of communicating with the demonic realm. This was made clear in the apocryphal book of Enoch. John also associates the Biblical terms "diviner and sorcerer" with the merchants of the world. Satan imitates everything that God does, including prophesy, and raising up oracles.
Are you beginning the see the bigger picture?
The rabbit hole is about to get deeper.
Have you ever heard of the Jesuits, also known as the Society of Jesus? They are a secret order with allegiances only to the Pope and the Catholic Church. They have made blood-curdling oaths to eliminate "infidels," or those who reject the pontifical authority of the Holy See. They have vowed to control all religions and to use revolutions, coups, and political intrigue to expand the theocratic power of the papacy.
Since the 1500s they have done this very thing. And they are still alive and well today. Indeed, the history of the last 500 years is effectually the history of the secret workings and manipulations of the Jesuit Order into all aspects of world politics and religion.
The Birth of the Jesuit Order
A mixture of piety and diplomacy, ascetism and worldly wisdom, mysticism and cold calculation; as was Loyola's character, so is the trade-mark of this Order. (Professor J. Huber, quoted in, The Secret History of the Jesuits, by Edmond Paris, 1982)
Ignatius would become the first "General," or Black Pope, and the Jesuit Order would become the militant arm of Catholicism. Candidates for entry into the Order would spend fourteen years proving their loyalty. These "sons of Loyola" would work tirelessly to accomplish their two-fold goals for the Roman Catholic Church: making it the dominating political and religious power throughout the world.
Ignatius had an in with the powers that be. He was friends with Charles Habsburg, grandson of both the Holy Roman Emperor Maximilian and King Ferdinand of Spain, who became both the king of Spain and Emperor of Rome. With permission from Pope Adrian VI, Ignatius embarked on a quest to visit Jerusalem, where he perfected his "Spiritual Exercises" that would become the basis of Jesuit philosophy. He was also initiated into a gnostic secret society known as the "Enlightened Ones," a precursor to the Illuminati.
After his vision of the Virgin Mary (whom he referred to as the Queen of Heaven), he determined that he was finally "free of fleshly lusts," and ready to be initiated "into the mysteries of holy warfare." His interest in making the pilgrimage to Jerusalem was to "revive" the Knights Templar, which meant to reconvene the crusades against Jewish, Islamic, and the newly Protestant infidels. While Ignatius was making this trek Martin Luther was rotting in prison for daring to question the papacy with his 95 theses.
Tupper Saussey, author of Rulers of Evil, hypothesizes that in route to Jerusalem Ignatius was given the "litanies, lists, secret codes, formulae, cabalah, and other portable assets comprising the Knights Templar resources" by the commander of a ship named Negrona, one Diego Manes.
This inference makes sense when viewed in light of the ancient mysteries, especially since the Book of Mormon tells us that Satan establishes secret societies among all people. The names change but the philosophies, initiations, and goals to get gain are passed down and remain the same.
In fact, the Holy Roman Catholic Church was just a new front for the Mystery Religion of Nimrod and Semiramis. Holy Roman scripture is not based upon the Bible at all, but rather upon Virgil's Aeneid and the ten Sibylline gospels. According to Saussey:
The Aeneid implied that every Roman's duty was to sacrifice his individuality, as heroic Aeneas had done, to the greater glory of Rome and Pontifex Maximus...
The Sibyllines and the Aeneid were so beloved by the government priests that they were considered part of the Roman constitution. The same scriptures were made part of the United States Constitution when the mottos "ANNUIT COEPTIS" and "NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM" taken from the Aeneid and the Sibyllines respectively, were incorporated, by the Act of July 28, 1782, into the Great Seal of the United States. (Rulers of Evil, p. 15-16)
Pontifex Maximus means chief priest, the "vicar" of God to whom the common man should look for salvation. Catholicism means universal, or all-encompassing; the clandestine purpose of the Church is found within its very name. As you can see, the modern push toward the ecumenical movement is nothing new, but rather a reversion back to the old world order. It’s all about power and control; whitewashing the psyche and turning mankind into a society of mindless automatons, incapable of reason or independent thought.
Can you see why the Catholic Church expended so much energy attempting to suppress the Bible? Its simple teachings show that all one has to do is look to Christ alone for salvation. This was antithetical to the papacy's ambitions.
Can you hear Nephi's words about churches being built up to get power over the flesh ringing in you ear?
How can churches get power over the flesh without amassing political power?
It is this very thing that the Jesuits have sworn oaths to establish. Indeed, what follows is a portion of the oath that these luminaries swear, and it is downright chilling:
I do further promise and declare that I will have no opinion, or will of my own, or any mental reservation whatever, even as a corpse or cadaver, but will unhesitatingly obey each and every command that I may receive from my superiors in the militia of the Pope. I further promise and declare that I will make and wage relentless war, as I am directed to do to extirpate and exterminate Protestants and liberals from the face of the whole earth. That when the same cannot be done openly, I will secretly use the poison cup, the strangulation cord, the steel of the poniard, or the leaden bullet.
I will neither spare age, sex, or condition. I will hang, burn, waste, boil, flay, strangle, and bury alive these infamous heretics, rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women, and crush their infant's heads against the wall, in order to annihilate forever their execrable race.
Who were the first targets of the Jesuit Order?
Protestants and liberals.
Or, in other words, those who sought reform and change, who protested the tyranny of the Catholic leviathan. The Protestant Reformation was headed by rebels like Luther and Calvin, and fueled from Guttenberg's Bibles that were hot off the presses. What is interesting is that some believe that Martin Luther was a Rosicrucian, a fellow initiate of the Mystery Schools, and that Lutheranism was nothing but controlled opposition. But this is a rabbit hole for another time.
When looking at the history of the Jesuits, you have to do so from the perspective of Hegelian dialecticism. Controlled opposition is the name of the game.
The Protestant Reformation was primarily responsible for the American Revolution. Nephi saw this in vision, and described it as a struggle for religious liberty; a humble group of Christians seeking to break the chains of politico-religious captivity. Or, in other words, that age-old theme of liberty versus power. (See this post for an interesting delve into how American government was based upon decentralized religious uprisings).
A little-known fact that few people are aware of is that the Jesuits were disbanded just before the American Revolution began. In 1773, the papacy itself had had enough of the Jesuits, when Pope Clement XIV suppressed the Order by issuing his papal brief known as Dominus ac Redemptor.
Forced to go underground, the Jesuits found sanctuary in Bavaria, and under the tutelage of one of their priests, Adam Weishaupt, they founded the Order of the Illuminati in 1776, the same year that the American colonies declared their independence. Weishaupt was born in Ingolstadt, trained at a Jesuit school as a lawyer, and eventually taught canon law as a professor.
Under the auspices of the Illuminati, the Jesuits regrouped and made plans to infiltrate Protestant America and return it to the jaws of the papacy. Even though they had been suppressed by Pope Clement, they continued their business as usual under orders from their Superior General, and by 1814, Pope Pius VII officially reinstated them. But they had already been clandestinely intervening in American politics since the Revolution.
Now, there is a lot of confusion about the Founding Fathers being deists and Freemasons. Yes, many of them resided in both camps, but they were NOT Jesuits (the Jesuits began infiltrating American Freemasonry during this same period). In fact, they downright eschewed the Jesuits, and many of the struggles that we read about in our history books make more sense when read in the context of the Jesuit conspiracy.
The first president the Jesuits assassinated was none other than George Washington. The official story is that Washington became ill after a few days of riding in the cold on his property at Mt. Vernon and staying too long in his wets clothes. But could this brawny 67 year-old really have succumbed to winter weather? After all, he survived famine and cold for months at Valley Forge.
His "official" cause of death was tuberculosis, which strangely causes the same symptoms as arsenic poisoning. From the time he became ill to the time of death was only a mere two days. One of his three attending physicians during that time could have easily administered the poison.
But why would the Jesuits want to kill Washington, an old retired and relatively harmless man living on a farm in Virginia?
The simple answer: revenge.
He had established a foreign policy of isolationism and neutrality. His famous farewell address cemented that philosophy into the minds of Americans; friendly relations with all nations, and entangling alliances with none. Because of this policy, the Jesuits would have to enter America through the back door of conspiratorial infiltration.
The other reason was the Whisky Rebellion of 1793. Although as a libertarian I wholeheartedly agree with the concept of tax protestation, the truth is that the rebellion was spear-headed by French ambassador Edmond-Charles Genet, a Jacobin plant. The Jacobins were a sub-group of the Illuminati that had control of Freemasonry in France, and Washington was clueless to the fact that in suppressing the rebellion he was really taking on the Jesuits.
As I stated before, you have to look at history through the dialectic lens. The conspirators will use any means they can to foment chaos and revolution, even pretending like they are tax protestors. Interestingly, it was Hamilton who pressured Washington to put down the rebellion, being the tax-hungry nationalist that he was. And although Washington raised a militia and appeared to march against the dissenters, no shots were fired, and ultimately, everyone went home and back to business as usual.
It is my belief that they were trying to draw fire, to start a bloody conflict, and Washington refused to take the bait. For this he was killed.
Have you ever thought it strange that John Adams and Thomas Jefferson both died on the same day, that day being the 50th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence? Did you know that James Monroe also died on July 4th? And did you know that autopsies were never performed on any of these presidents, including George Washington?
In a private correspondence from British statesman George Cannon to congressman John Quincy Adams, a warning was issued about a conspiracy to destroy America from an unholy alliance between European monarchs, the Pope, and the Jesuits. Adams warned president James Monroe, who wrote to Jefferson and received this reply:
This is the greatest affront to America since the Revolution... We need to do everything we can to oppose and stop this holy alliance set up the monarchs of Europe, the Pope, and the Jesuit Order...
Jefferson continued that he:
did not want to pass up an opportunity of declaring our protest against the atrocious violations of the rights of nations, by the interference of any one in the internal affairs of another, so flagitiously begun by Bonaparte, and now continued by the equally lawless Alliance, calling itself Holy. (Letter from Jefferson to Monroe, October 24, 1823)
The president retaliated by establishing the Monroe Doctrine, the official American declaration against European powers intervening in American affairs. This was designed as a vehicle to protect America from Jesuit infiltration.
It is clear why the Jesuits wanted Jefferson and Monroe dead. But what about John Adams?
During his presidency there was a quasi-war with Jacobin-controlled France, and in an attempt to keep Jesuit infiltrators out of the United States, Adams signed the Alien and Sedition Acts into law in 1798. Washington vowed to Adams that he would come out of retirement as a General and lead militias to defend America from France if necessary.
Now, again as a libertarian I totally disagree with the Alien and Sedition Acts because of the increased power they gave to the central government. However, these acts make much more sense when viewed in the Jesuit context. It seems as though sometimes desperate men with good intentions use questionable avenues to suppress the designs of evil men.
The deaths of all three presidents occurring on July 4th was a direct message from the Jesuits to future presidents not to meddle with their plans. Their preferred method of murder was poison, as it often matches the symptoms of common diseases.
Believe it or not this clue was given to us in the Book of Mormon.
Amalickiah also used the method of Hegelian dialecticism to achieve his ends. He is a typology of the modern Jesuits. Think about it for just a moment. He began by first dissenting from the church, and then by forming a political following. Through intrigue, murder, and propaganda, he became the de facto king of the Lamanites.
Do you see the message? A Nephite becomes the king of the Lamanites.
God is trying to tell you something. Pay close attention to the details. Remember that Amalickiah had one of his servants administer poison to Lehonti by degrees? By killing Lehonti, Amalickiah would become the chief captain of the Lamanites. But he had to make it look like the man died from disease, so Lehonti was not given the poison all at once, but by degrees.
Samuel Smith was killed in this exact manner by Hosea Stout. He was slowly poisoned (by degrees) for weeks before his death.
How many famous men in history have been killed this way by the Jesuits yet were said to have died by natural causes or disease?
William Henry Harrison, Zachary Taylor, and Southern General Stonewall Jackson were also poisoned by the Jesuits.
Harrison served the shortest presidential term in history, a mere 31 days. He was said to have come down with pneumonia from delivering a two-hour inaugural address in cold weather. Taylor "took sick" from eating a bowl of raw fruit, the culprit being cherries. And Jackson supposedly died from pneumonia induced by battle wounds.
Harrison' crime? He lambasted the "divine right of kings" in his inaugural address, a favorite doctrine of the Jesuits, and of the Mystery Schools I might add (this is another theme taught in the Book of Mormon, see 3 Nephi 2:2, RE, the Gadianton leaders believed they also had a "right" to rule).
Harrison was also against the annexation of Texas into the Union, fearing that because it was a slave-state it would further divide the nation. The Jesuits were also behind the Civil War, using the issues of slavery, high tariffs, and secession to divide the states. They wanted to use the war to punish Southern Protestants and to bring the nation under the subjection of the papacy.
Taylor's crime? Being a populist president with a military background. This made him a strong leader. He opposed the Compromise of 1850, which he surmised would further divide the nation on the slavery issue. Although he was a slave holder, he wanted to see the newly annexed California and New Mexico enter the Union as a free states. Taylor's first priority was to preserve the Union and his intransigence brought the Compromise of 1850 to a standstill. After Taylor's death Millard Fillmore finalized the Compromise, which did nothing to avert the future war but rather fueled it.
Thomas Jonathan "Stonewall" Jackson was removed for a one simple reason: his valor and all-out will to win the war. After General Lee deliberately sacrificed his men at the battle of Gettysburg, Jackson was wounded by friendly fire and would have his arm amputated. While recovering Lee ordered him to be taken thirty miles away to Guiney Station where he was "treated" by a doctor. Jackson, although insisting he was fine, was taken against his will to a secluded shack and died of "pneumonia" shortly thereafter.
General Lee was in cahoots with the Jesuits, along with Union Generals Sheridan and Sherman. Here is a photo of General Sherman posing while showing the Masonic gesture of the hidden hand.Lincoln was most likely not aware of their complicity. In fact, Lincoln, although playing into the hands of the Jesuits in his means of conducting the war against states rights, was already marked for death by the secret Order.
His crime? Defending a Catholic priest who became a whistle-blower against a group of corrupt Jesuit priests engaging in theft and sexual promiscuity in Chicago. His name was Charles Chiniquy, and when he went to his bishop to report these deviants, he was told to be silent. He refused to comply with the bishop, and in an attempt to silence him, they falsely accused the man of rape.
Chiniquy hired Abraham Lincoln as his defense lawyer, and after a witness came forth with firsthand testimony of the plan concocted by Church leaders to frame him for rape, the case was dropped (a case that was one of the biggest of Lincoln's career). Chiniquy was in tears, but they weren't tears of joy. Chiniquy told Lincoln that the eleven Jesuits sitting in the courtroom that day would surely kill him for taking on the case. To this Lincoln replied:
It matters not where a man must die, but that he must die at the post of duty and honor.
Lincoln also defied European bankers by using American greenbacks to finance the Civil War, and although he felt justified in destroying the Constitution in order to "save" the Union, I do not believe that he would've put the South through the harsh years of Reconstruction that was implemented by the Radical Republicans.
What is the point of all this history? To show you that the Jesuits have been intervening in American matters for the last two centuries. For the full story, watch the following documentary, it will blow your mind:
The Jesuits in the 20th Century
I looked them [the Rothschilds] up in Encyclopedia Judaica and discovered that they bear the title "Guardians of the Vatican Treasury." The Vatican Treasury, of course, holds the imperial wealth of Rome... Ceasarean soldiers protected themselves in battle with shields painted red... Hence, the appropriateness of the name Rothschild, German for "red shield."
The appointment of Rothschild gave the black papacy absolute financial privacy and secrecy. Who would ever search a family of orthodox Jews for the keys to the wealth of the Roman Catholic Church?
... It is fascinating that, as Meyer Rothschild's sons grew into the family business, the firm took on the title Meyer Amschel Rothschild und Sohne, which gives the notariqon MARS. Isn't Mars the Roman God of War, whose heavenly manifestation is the "red planet"? There is some powerful cabalah here... (Rulers of Evil, pp. 160-61)
What did Morgan know?
It's an axe-head whose handle is a bundle of rods tightly strapped together by a red sinew. It symbolizes the ordering of priestly functions into a single infallible sovereign, an autocrat who could require life and limb of his subjects. If the fasces is entwined with laurel, like the pair on the House wall, it signifies Caesarean military power. The Romans called this infallible sovereign Pontifex Maximus, "Supreme Bridgebuilder." (Rulers of Evil, p. 6)
In light of Saussey's statement, it should come as no surprise that along with the Bolsheviks, the Vatican and the Black Pope orchestrated and financed the rise of Mussolini and Hitler. Both men, as it turns out, were Roman Catholic.
Mussolini's handler was Father Tacchi Venturi, a Jesuit priest. Mussolini is given credit for negotiating the Lateran Treaty of 1929 that established the Vatican as a sovereign state, but Venturi was the mastermind behind it. Mussolini raised 750 million liras by stealing gold from the Italian people (reminiscent of what FDR did) and offered it to the Vatican. They used this gold to buy up bankrupt companies on Wallstreet after the stock market crash of 1929.
Everything was falling into place to bring Hitler to power.
The Jesuit Superior General during the interim period between WWI and WWII was Halke Von Ledochowski, and he had a plan to create a federation of Catholic nations including: Austria, Slovakia, Bohemia, Poland, Hungary, Croatia, and Bavaria. According to Edmond Paris:
This new central Empire had to fight on two fronts: on the eastern side against the Soviet Union, on the western side against Prussia, Protestant Great-Britain, and republican, rebellious France. (Secret History of the Jesuits)
Have you ever heard it taught in an establishment history course that the great world wars were religious crusades?
Of course not. This history has been suppressed. And for good reason. If American students were taught this history they would have to reconcile the fact that American bankers financed violent crusades and mass genocides against European Christians, Jews, and liberal Catholics.
Could Nephi's prophecy have both medieval and modern implications? Read it again with this history in mind:
And it came to pass that I saw among the nations of the gentiles the formation of a great church. And the angel said unto me, Behold the formation of a church that is most abominable above all other churches, which slayeth the saints of God, yea, and tortureth them, and bindeth them down, and yoketh them with a yoke of iron, and bringeth them down into captivity. (1 Nephi 3:19 RE, emphasis added)
And what was the ultimate result of WWII? In the meeting between FDR, Stalin, and Churchill at the Yalta conference in 1945, millions of Eastern European and Slavic peoples were handed over to the Soviet Union and abandoned by the western "free" nations.
My question is this: was the "yoke of iron" that Nephi saw his way of describing what we know as the Iron Curtain? It certainly fits when you study this version of 20th century history.
According to Edmond Paris, Mussolini was "the prototype" of the obedient Catholic son crusading for the Mother Church. Quoting Antonio Aniante, Paris records the following:
Hitler receives his impetus from Mussolini; the ideal of the Nazi is the same as in Italy... Since Mussolini is at the head, all the sympathies are for Berlin... In 1923, Fascism merges with National-Socialism; he becomes friends with Hitler to whom he supplies arms and money. (Secret History of the Jesuits)
Hitler, like Mussolini, was another obedient Catholic son, using revolution to wage war on disobedient infidels. He had been carefully trained by Jesuit handlers beginning as early as 1919. In fact, Hitler based his entire government on Catholic hierarchy. He made the following emphatic statement:
Until now, there has never been anything more grandiose, on the earth, than the hierarchical organization of the Catholic Church. I transferred much of this organization into my own party. (Ibid)
Hitler made Himmler the equivalent of the Black Pope:
The S.S. organization had been constituted, by Himmler, according to the principles of the Jesuits' Order. Their regulations and the Spiritual Exercises prescribed by Ignatius of Loyola were the model Himmler tried to copy exactly... The "Reichsfuhrer SS" --Himmler's title as supreme chief of the SS-- was to be the equivalent of the Jesuits' "General" and the whole structure of the direction was a close imitation of the Catholic Church's hierarchical order. (Walter Schellenberg, quoted in Secret History of the Jesuits)
After the war many Nazi's were given sanctuary in Catholic monasteries and some were taken to America under Operation Paperclip. Pope Pius XII, the acting pontiff during WWII, never condemned the Holocaust and neither has any Pope since. The Vatican was behind the entire thing. In fact, Hitler did not even write his own autobiography known as Mein Kampf. It was ghost-written by Jesuit Father Bernhard Staempfle; Hitler was a sleeper from the beginning, he was being manipulated from behind the scenes.
It is well known now that the Bush family were Nazi collaborators. But did you know that they made their fortune after setting up Union Banking Corporation with Averell Harriman (son of railroad magnate E. H. Harriman)? This was a money laundering operation for many Nazi businesses.
Prescott Bush and George Herbert Walker (maternal grandfather of George H. W. Bush) were partnered with German coal barren Fritz Thyssen, and in collaboration with I.G. Farben, they helped to build the Nazi war machine. In 1951 Thyssen died in Argentina, and Union Banking Corporation was liquidated by the U.S. government. Prescott Bush received $1.5 million for his holdings in the company, and thus began the Bush dynasty.
The Bushes are high-ranking Skull and Bonesmen, and when Nelson Rockefeller was vice-president under Gerald Ford, George H. W. Bush was running the CIA and negotiating diplomatic relations with China, and only a mere decade later we have Russel M. Nelson establishing religious relations with the Chinese Communist Party.
Is it a coincidence that two Bonesmen were establishing politico-religious relations with the CCP within such a short timespan?
I don't think so, especially considering the fact that Skull and Bones is the American wing of the Bavarian Illuminati. And as you'll recall from earlier in this post, the Illuminati was a Jesuit operation from its inception in 1776.
It is time to address the elephant in the room and ask the question: do the Jesuits control both the Bushes and the Mormon Church?
In 2007, George W. Bush bowed to the Pope:
In 2019, Russel Nelson meets with the Pope for 33 minutes and refers to him as "his holiness."
From whom do these Bonesman take their marching orders from?
As you'll recall from my last post, apostle Gerrit Gong worked directly under the Bushes during the 1980s around the same time that Russel Nelson made him the Branch President of the Church in Beijing.
Is this all connected somehow?
In March of 2022 I published a post entitled, They Seek Deep to Hide their Councils from the Lord. In it I summarized a story that D. Christian Markham published in Volume I of Two Churches Only. It is the story of the Melbourne Man.
The Melbourne Man was a self-proclaimed member of the Church of the Devil. He had a very interesting conversation with a Mormon missionary named Marion Law. Click on the post link to read the whole story, but for now just know that this mysterious man told Marion in 1947 that the LDS Church was the only religion not directly controlled by the conspirators, but that they were in their control, and when the time came that they had "political and economic control of the world..." they could finally establish their "total spiritual program."
They achieved their "economic control" of the world after 1971 when the gold standard for trading nations was scrapped and the IMF could inflate across currencies at will. I believe their political control is coming soon, and my question is this: will the LDS Church play a part in that "spiritual program"?
Is what they are building at Temple Square an infrastructure that will help them assume this new role assigned to them by the Vatican?
Could it be that along with earthquake-proofing existing buildings, they are excavating massive tunnel systems with underground bunkers and a subterranean military base?
Tunnels under Temple Square already existed, which they claim they are demolishing to dig up to sixty feet below the surface to reinforce the temple foundation against earthquakes. This was admitted in this article by the Deseret News.
But is the "renovation" just a ruse to build new underground infrastructure, complete with secret rooms and bunkers where General Authorities can safely hide their hypocritical faces when the UN is rounding up political dissidents and bringing them to smart-city concentration camps?
Only time will tell.
But a more serious question should be asked first:
Has the LDS Church been infiltrated by the Jesuit Order?
And are they now just another wing of the Catholic Church, with allegiances only to the Pope and the Jesuit Superior General?
In 1981, there was a sign given to all Jesuits that every religion in the world had been infiltrated by them.
In Part VIII, the final installment of the Beast is Coming to Utah series, I'll get in to what that sign was, as well as how far the Jesuits are willing to go to stay in power... even to the point of making themselves disappear... reminiscent of the proverbial snake eating its own tail.
This will require a little more history to get into, and some of it will make your head spin.
In the meantime, consider these wise words from Paul:
And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them, for it is shame to even speak of those things which are done of them in secret. (Ephesians 1:18, RE)